--- name: clean-code description: "Applies principles from Robert C. Martin's 'Clean Code'. Use this skill when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to ensure high quality, readability, and maintainability. Covers naming, functio..." risk: safe source: "ClawForge (https://github.com/jackjin1997/ClawForge)" date_added: "2026-02-27" --- # Clean Code Skill This skill embodies the principles of "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob). Use it to transform "code that works" into "code that is clean." ## 🧠 Core Philosophy > "Code is clean if it can be read, and enhanced by a developer other than its original author." — Grady Booch ## When to Use Use this skill when: - **Writing new code**: To ensure high quality from the start. - **Reviewing Pull Requests**: To provide constructive, principle-based feedback. - **Refactoring legacy code**: To identify and remove code smells. - **Improving team standards**: To align on industry-standard best practices. ## 1. Meaningful Names - **Use Intention-Revealing Names**: `elapsedTimeInDays` instead of `d`. - **Avoid Disinformation**: Don't use `accountList` if it's actually a `Map`. - **Make Meaningful Distinctions**: Avoid `ProductData` vs `ProductInfo`. - **Use Pronounceable/Searchable Names**: Avoid `genymdhms`. - **Class Names**: Use nouns (`Customer`, `WikiPage`). Avoid `Manager`, `Data`. - **Method Names**: Use verbs (`postPayment`, `deletePage`). ## 2. Functions - **Small!**: Functions should be shorter than you think. - **Do One Thing**: A function should do only one thing, and do it well. - **One Level of Abstraction**: Don't mix high-level business logic with low-level details (like regex). - **Descriptive Names**: `isPasswordValid` is better than `check`. - **Arguments**: 0 is ideal, 1-2 is okay, 3+ requires a very strong justification. - **No Side Effects**: Functions shouldn't secretly change global state. ## 3. Comments - **Don't Comment Bad Code—Rewrite It**: Most comments are a sign of failure to express ourselves in code. - **Explain Yourself in Code**: ```python # Check if employee is eligible for full benefits if employee.flags & HOURLY and employee.age > 65: ``` vs ```python if employee.isEligibleForFullBenefits(): ``` - **Good Comments**: Legal, Informative (regex intent), Clarification (external libraries), TODOs. - **Bad Comments**: Mumbling, Redundant, Misleading, Mandated, Noise, Position Markers. ## 4. Formatting - **The Newspaper Metaphor**: High-level concepts at the top, details at the bottom. - **Vertical Density**: Related lines should be close to each other. - **Distance**: Variables should be declared near their usage. - **Indentation**: Essential for structural readability. ## 5. Objects and Data Structures - **Data Abstraction**: Hide the implementation behind interfaces. - **The Law of Demeter**: A module should not know about the innards of the objects it manipulates. Avoid `a.getB().getC().doSomething()`. - **Data Transfer Objects (DTO)**: Classes with public variables and no functions. ## 6. Error Handling - **Use Exceptions instead of Return Codes**: Keeps logic clean. - **Write Try-Catch-Finally First**: Defines the scope of the operation. - **Don't Return Null**: It forces the caller to check for null every time. - **Don't Pass Null**: Leads to `NullPointerException`. ## 7. Unit Tests - **The Three Laws of TDD**: 1. Don't write production code until you have a failing unit test. 2. Don't write more of a unit test than is sufficient to fail. 3. Don't write more production code than is sufficient to pass the failing test. - **F.I.R.S.T. Principles**: Fast, Independent, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely. ## 8. Classes - **Small!**: Classes should have a single responsibility (SRP). - **The Stepdown Rule**: We want the code to read like a top-down narrative. ## 9. Smells and Heuristics - **Rigidity**: Hard to change. - **Fragility**: Breaks in many places. - **Immobility**: Hard to reuse. - **Viscosity**: Hard to do the right thing. - **Needless Complexity/Repetition**. ## 🛠️ Implementation Checklist - [ ] Is this function smaller than 20 lines? - [ ] Does this function do exactly one thing? - [ ] Are all names searchable and intention-revealing? - [ ] Have I avoided comments by making the code clearer? - [ ] Am I passing too many arguments? - [ ] Is there a failing test for this change?