Files
antigravity-skills-reference/plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md
2026-04-08 16:47:15 +00:00

2.8 KiB

name, description, category, risk, source, source_repo, source_type, date_added, author, tags, tools
name description category risk source source_repo source_type date_added author tags tools
ui-review Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality. design safe community bitjaru/styleseed community 2026-04-08 bitjaru
ui
review
design-system
accessibility
styleseed
claude
cursor
codex
gemini

UI Review

Overview

Part of StyleSeed, this skill audits UI code against the Toss seed's conventions instead of reviewing it as generic frontend work. It focuses on design-token discipline, component ergonomics, accessibility, mobile readiness, typography, and spacing consistency.

When to Use

  • Use when a component or page should follow the StyleSeed Toss design language
  • Use when reviewing a UI-heavy PR for consistency and design-system violations
  • Use when the output looks "mostly fine" but feels off in subtle ways
  • Use when you need a structured review with concrete fixes

Review Checklist

Design Tokens

  • no hardcoded hex colors when semantic tokens exist
  • no improvised shadow values when tokenized shadows exist
  • no arbitrary radius choices outside the system scale
  • no random spacing values that break the seed rhythm

Component Conventions

  • uses the project's class merge helper
  • supports className extension when appropriate
  • uses the agreed typing pattern
  • avoids wrapper components that only forward one class string
  • reuses existing primitives before inventing new ones

Accessibility

  • touch targets large enough for mobile
  • visible keyboard focus states
  • labels and aria-* attributes where needed
  • adequate color contrast
  • reduced-motion respect for animation

Mobile UX

  • no horizontal overflow
  • safe-area handling where relevant
  • readable text sizes
  • thumb-friendly interaction spacing
  • bottom nav or sticky actions do not obscure content

Typography and Spacing

  • uses the system type hierarchy
  • display and headings are not overly loose
  • body text remains readable
  • spacing follows the seed grid instead of arbitrary values

Output Format

Return:

  1. A verdict: Pass, Needs Improvement, or Fail
  2. A prioritized list of issues with file and line references when available
  3. Concrete fixes for each issue
  4. Any open questions where the design intent is ambiguous

Best Practices

  • Review against the seed, not against personal taste
  • Separate stylistic drift from real usability or accessibility bugs
  • Prefer actionable diffs over abstract criticism
  • Call out duplication when an existing component already solves the problem

Additional Resources