Files
daymade 6d261ce801 feat(deep-research): V6.1 source accessibility policy and Counter-Review Team
- Correct source accessibility: distinguish circular verification (forbidden)
  from exclusive information advantage (encouraged)
- Add Counter-Review Team with 5 specialized agents (claim-validator,
  source-diversity-checker, recency-validator, contradiction-finder,
  counter-review-coordinator)
- Add Enterprise Research Mode: 6-dimension data collection framework
  with SWOT, competitive barrier, and risk matrix analysis
- Update version to 2.4.0
- Add comprehensive reference docs:
  - source_accessibility_policy.md
  - V6_1_improvements.md
  - counter_review_team_guide.md
  - enterprise_analysis_frameworks.md
  - enterprise_quality_checklist.md
  - enterprise_research_methodology.md
  - quality_gates.md
  - report_template_v6.md
  - research_notes_format.md
  - subagent_prompt.md

Based on "深度推理" case study methodology lessons learned.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-04 09:15:17 +08:00

2.2 KiB

{{TITLE}}

研究日期: {{DATE}} | 来源数量: {{SOURCE_COUNT}} | 字数: ~{{WORD_COUNT}} | 模式: {{MODE}} | AS_OF: {{AS_OF}} | 官方源占比: {{OFFICIAL_SHARE}}

摘要 / Executive Summary

{{200-400 words summarizing key findings, methodology, conclusions, and risks.}}


目录

{{Auto-generate from actual section headers below.}}


{{BODY SECTIONS — Adapt to topic type and include opposing interpretation per section.}}

For each section:

N. [Topic-Specific Section Title]

{{Section content with inline citations [1][2]. Standard mode: 500-1000 words per section. Lightweight mode: 300-600 words per section.

Rules:

  • 每个事实性论点都需要引用 [n]
  • 数字/百分比必须有来源
  • 出现不同证据时要成对给出支持与反驳 }}

置信度: High/Medium/Low

依据: {{Why this confidence level — source agreement, evidence quality, data availability}}

反方解释: {{One explicit opposing interpretation with supporting citations if any, or [unverified] if insufficient.}}


{{COUNTER-REVIEW SUMMARY}}

  • 核心争议 1: [主张 A 与反向证据 B 对比] [n][m]
  • 核心争议 2: ...

关键发现 / Key Findings

{{3-5 findings in Standard mode, 2-3 in Lightweight. Each finding should:}}

  • 具体结论
  • 对应引文
  • 信心说明

Example:

  • 发现 1: [Most important discovery] [3][7]
  • 发现 2: [Second most important] [1][4]

局限性与未来方向 / Limitations & Future Directions

本研究局限

{{Be explicit:

  • What topics/angles couldn't be covered and why
  • Methodological limits (web-accessible sources, paywall, language, timing)
  • Source coverage gaps and counter-claim evidence gaps }}

未来方向

{{Concrete suggestions for follow-up research with priority and responsible evidence type.}}


参考文献 / References

[1] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: official/academic/secondary-industry/journalism/community/other. As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL. [2] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: ... As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL.

Rules:

  • Every [n] in body MUST have matching entry here
  • Every entry here MUST be cited at least once
  • Source-Type and As Of fields are mandatory
  • All URLs MUST come from actual search results (P2 source pool)