Files
claude-code-skills-reference/meeting-minutes-taker/references/completeness_review_checklist.md
daymade 1c538567f6 feat: Add meeting-minutes-taker skill and sanitization workflow
New skill: meeting-minutes-taker
- Transform meeting transcripts into structured minutes
- Multi-pass parallel generation with UNION merge
- Evidence-based recording with speaker quotes
- Mermaid diagrams for architecture discussions
- Iterative human-in-the-loop refinement
- Bundled references: template and completeness checklist

skill-creator enhancements:
- Add Step 5: Sanitization Review (Optional)
- New references/sanitization_checklist.md with:
  - 8 categories of content to sanitize
  - Automated grep scan commands
  - 3-phase sanitization process
  - Common pitfalls and completion checklist
- Renumber existing steps 5-8 to 6-9

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-24 18:20:19 +08:00

3.7 KiB

Meeting Minutes Review Checklist

Contents

  • Completeness Review Process (4 phases: structural, content depth, quotes, action items)
  • Common Omission Patterns (technical, business logic, process items)
  • Merge Strategy (multi-version union rules)
  • Red Flags (signs of missing content)

Completeness Review Process

Phase 1: Structural Check

  • All major discussion topics from transcript are covered
  • Each decision has supporting quote
  • All speakers who made decisions are attributed
  • Action items have specific owners (not generic "team")
  • Priorities assigned to all action items

Phase 2: Content Depth Check

For each transcript section, verify:

  • Entities/Data Models: All mentioned entities captured (tables, fields, relationships)
  • Numerical Values: Ranges, priorities, counts preserved (e.g., "0-99", "4 states", "3-4 categories")
  • State Machines: All states and transitions documented
  • Architecture Decisions: Data flow, dependencies, integration points
  • Trade-offs: Rejected alternatives and reasoning
  • Constraints: Technical limitations, MVP scope boundaries

Phase 3: Quote Verification

For significant decisions, ensure:

  • Quote accurately reflects speaker's point
  • Speaker attribution is correct
  • Context around quote is preserved

Phase 4: Action Items Audit

Cross-reference with transcript for:

  • Explicit task assignments ("Alice will handle...", "Bob, please...")
  • Implicit commitments ("I will design...", "Backend team will...")
  • Deferred items ("Defer to later...", "Not in MVP scope...")
  • Follow-up discussions needed ("Discuss offline...", "Follow up separately...")

Common Omission Patterns

Technical Details Often Missed

  1. Entity Hierarchies: Category → Subcategory → Item → Detail
  2. Field Definitions: What fields belong to which entity
  3. Calculation Rules: Priority orders, workflow logic, matching rules
  4. Storage Decisions: Where data is persisted, what's cached
  5. API Contracts: Who calls whom, sync vs async

Business Logic Often Missed

  1. State Transitions: What triggers state changes
  2. Permission Rules: Who can do what
  3. Validation Rules: Required fields, constraints
  4. Display Logic: What's shown where, sorting rules
  5. Integration Points: Cross-system data sharing

Process Items Often Missed

  1. Design Approach: Joint vs separate design decisions
  2. Dependency Order: What blocks what
  3. Offline Follow-ups: Items requiring separate discussion
  4. Scope Deferrals: What's explicitly pushed to Phase 2

Merge Strategy (Multi-Version Union)

When merging versions:

  1. Keep ALL content from existing version - Never remove unless explicitly wrong
  2. Add NEW content from incoming version - Union, not replace
  3. Resolve conflicts by combining - Include both perspectives
  4. Preserve more detailed version - When same topic has different depth
  5. Maintain structure - Keep section numbering logical

Merge Checklist

  • All sections from original preserved
  • All sections from new version added (or merged into existing)
  • No duplicate content (consolidate if same info appears twice)
  • Quotes from both versions preserved
  • Action items from both versions merged
  • Numbering remains sequential

Red Flags (Signs of Missing Content)

  • Transcript mentions a topic not in minutes
  • Decision recorded without quote
  • Action item without clear owner
  • Long transcript section summarized in one sentence
  • Technical discussion with no entity/field names
  • "TBD" items without clear description
  • State machine with fewer states than mentioned
  • Priority/order system without number ranges