- Correct source accessibility: distinguish circular verification (forbidden) from exclusive information advantage (encouraged) - Add Counter-Review Team with 5 specialized agents (claim-validator, source-diversity-checker, recency-validator, contradiction-finder, counter-review-coordinator) - Add Enterprise Research Mode: 6-dimension data collection framework with SWOT, competitive barrier, and risk matrix analysis - Update version to 2.4.0 - Add comprehensive reference docs: - source_accessibility_policy.md - V6_1_improvements.md - counter_review_team_guide.md - enterprise_analysis_frameworks.md - enterprise_quality_checklist.md - enterprise_research_methodology.md - quality_gates.md - report_template_v6.md - research_notes_format.md - subagent_prompt.md Based on "深度推理" case study methodology lessons learned. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.2 KiB
{{TITLE}}
研究日期: {{DATE}} | 来源数量: {{SOURCE_COUNT}} | 字数: ~{{WORD_COUNT}} | 模式: {{MODE}} | AS_OF: {{AS_OF}} | 官方源占比: {{OFFICIAL_SHARE}}
摘要 / Executive Summary
{{200-400 words summarizing key findings, methodology, conclusions, and risks.}}
目录
{{Auto-generate from actual section headers below.}}
{{BODY SECTIONS — Adapt to topic type and include opposing interpretation per section.}}
For each section:
N. [Topic-Specific Section Title]
{{Section content with inline citations [1][2]. Standard mode: 500-1000 words per section. Lightweight mode: 300-600 words per section.
Rules:
- 每个事实性论点都需要引用 [n]
- 数字/百分比必须有来源
- 出现不同证据时要成对给出支持与反驳 }}
置信度: High/Medium/Low
依据: {{Why this confidence level — source agreement, evidence quality, data availability}}
反方解释: {{One explicit opposing interpretation with supporting citations if any, or [unverified] if insufficient.}}
{{COUNTER-REVIEW SUMMARY}}
- 核心争议 1: [主张 A 与反向证据 B 对比] [n][m]
- 核心争议 2: ...
关键发现 / Key Findings
{{3-5 findings in Standard mode, 2-3 in Lightweight. Each finding should:}}
- 具体结论
- 对应引文
- 信心说明
Example:
- 发现 1: [Most important discovery] [3][7]
- 发现 2: [Second most important] [1][4]
局限性与未来方向 / Limitations & Future Directions
本研究局限
{{Be explicit:
- What topics/angles couldn't be covered and why
- Methodological limits (web-accessible sources, paywall, language, timing)
- Source coverage gaps and counter-claim evidence gaps }}
未来方向
{{Concrete suggestions for follow-up research with priority and responsible evidence type.}}
参考文献 / References
[1] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: official/academic/secondary-industry/journalism/community/other. As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL. [2] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: ... As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL.
Rules:
- Every [n] in body MUST have matching entry here
- Every entry here MUST be cited at least once
- Source-Type and As Of fields are mandatory
- All URLs MUST come from actual search results (P2 source pool)