* chore: update gitignore for audit reports and playwright cache * fix: add YAML frontmatter (name + description) to all SKILL.md files - Added frontmatter to 34 skills that were missing it entirely (0% Tessl score) - Fixed name field format to kebab-case across all 169 skills - Resolves #284 * chore: sync codex skills symlinks [automated] * fix: optimize 14 low-scoring skills via Tessl review (#290) Tessl optimization: 14 skills improved from ≤69% to 85%+. Closes #285, #286. * chore: sync codex skills symlinks [automated] * fix: optimize 18 skills via Tessl review + compliance fix (closes #287) (#291) Phase 1: 18 skills optimized via Tessl (avg 77% → 95%). Closes #287. * feat: add scripts and references to 4 prompt-only skills + Tessl optimization (#292) Phase 2: 3 new scripts + 2 reference files for prompt-only skills. Tessl 45-55% → 94-100%. * feat: add 6 agents + 5 slash commands for full coverage (v2.7.0) (#293) Phase 3: 6 new agents (all 9 categories covered) + 5 slash commands. * fix: Phase 5 verification fixes + docs update (#294) Phase 5 verification fixes * chore: sync codex skills symlinks [automated] * fix: marketplace audit — all 11 plugins validated by Claude Code (#295) Marketplace audit: all 11 plugins validated + installed + tested in Claude Code * fix: restore 7 removed plugins + revert playwright-pro name to pw Reverts two overly aggressive audit changes: - Restored content-creator, demand-gen, fullstack-engineer, aws-architect, product-manager, scrum-master, skill-security-auditor to marketplace - Reverted playwright-pro plugin.json name back to 'pw' (intentional short name) * refactor: split 21 over-500-line skills into SKILL.md + references (#296) * chore: sync codex skills symlinks [automated] * docs: update all documentation with accurate counts and regenerated skill pages - Update skill count to 170, Python tools to 213, references to 314 across all docs - Regenerate all 170 skill doc pages from latest SKILL.md sources - Update CLAUDE.md with v2.1.1 highlights, accurate architecture tree, and roadmap - Update README.md badges and overview table - Update marketplace.json metadata description and version - Update mkdocs.yml, index.md, getting-started.md with correct numbers * fix: add root-level SKILL.md and .codex/instructions.md to all domains (#301) Root cause: CLI tools (ai-agent-skills, agent-skills-cli) look for SKILL.md at the specified install path. 7 of 9 domain directories were missing this file, causing "Skill not found" errors for bundle installs like: npx ai-agent-skills install alirezarezvani/claude-skills/engineering-team Fix: - Add root-level SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter to 7 domains - Add .codex/instructions.md to 8 domains (for Codex CLI discovery) - Update INSTALLATION.md with accurate skill counts (53→170) - Add troubleshooting entry for "Skill not found" error All 9 domains now have: SKILL.md + .codex/instructions.md + plugin.json Closes #301 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add Gemini CLI + OpenClaw support, fix Codex missing 25 skills Gemini CLI: - Add GEMINI.md with activation instructions - Add scripts/gemini-install.sh setup script - Add scripts/sync-gemini-skills.py (194 skills indexed) - Add .gemini/skills/ with symlinks for all skills, agents, commands - Remove phantom medium-content-pro entries from sync script - Add top-level folder filter to prevent gitignored dirs from leaking Codex CLI: - Fix sync-codex-skills.py missing "engineering" domain (25 POWERFUL skills) - Regenerate .codex/skills-index.json: 124 → 149 skills - Add 25 new symlinks in .codex/skills/ OpenClaw: - Add OpenClaw installation section to INSTALLATION.md - Add ClawHub install + manual install + YAML frontmatter docs Documentation: - Update INSTALLATION.md with all 4 platforms + accurate counts - Update README.md: "three platforms" → "four platforms" + Gemini quick start - Update CLAUDE.md with Gemini CLI support in v2.1.1 highlights - Update SKILL-AUTHORING-STANDARD.md + SKILL_PIPELINE.md with Gemini steps - Add OpenClaw + Gemini to installation locations reference table Marketplace: all 18 plugins validated — sources exist, SKILL.md present Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(product,pm): world-class product & PM skills audit — 6 scripts, 5 agents, 7 commands, 23 references/assets Phase 1 — Agent & Command Foundation: - Rewrite cs-project-manager agent (55→515 lines, 4 workflows, 6 skill integrations) - Expand cs-product-manager agent (408→684 lines, orchestrates all 8 product skills) - Add 7 slash commands: /rice, /okr, /persona, /user-story, /sprint-health, /project-health, /retro Phase 2 — Script Gap Closure (2,779 lines): - jira-expert: jql_query_builder.py (22 patterns), workflow_validator.py - confluence-expert: space_structure_generator.py, content_audit_analyzer.py - atlassian-admin: permission_audit_tool.py - atlassian-templates: template_scaffolder.py (Confluence XHTML generation) Phase 3 — Reference & Asset Enrichment: - 9 product references (competitive-teardown, landing-page-generator, saas-scaffolder) - 6 PM references (confluence-expert, atlassian-admin, atlassian-templates) - 7 product assets (templates for PRD, RICE, sprint, stories, OKR, research, design system) - 1 PM asset (permission_scheme_template.json) Phase 4 — New Agents: - cs-agile-product-owner, cs-product-strategist, cs-ux-researcher Phase 5 — Integration & Polish: - Related Skills cross-references in 8 SKILL.md files - Updated product-team/CLAUDE.md (5→8 skills, 6→9 tools, 4 agents, 5 commands) - Updated project-management/CLAUDE.md (0→12 scripts, 3 commands) - Regenerated docs site (177 pages), updated homepage and getting-started Quality audit: 31 files reviewed, 29 PASS, 2 fixed (copy-frameworks.md, governance-framework.md) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: audit and repair all plugins, agents, and commands - Fix 12 command files: correct CLI arg syntax, script paths, and usage docs - Fix 3 agents with broken script/reference paths (cs-content-creator, cs-demand-gen-specialist, cs-financial-analyst) - Add complete YAML frontmatter to 5 agents (cs-growth-strategist, cs-engineering-lead, cs-senior-engineer, cs-financial-analyst, cs-quality-regulatory) - Fix cs-ceo-advisor related agent path - Update marketplace.json metadata counts (224 tools, 341 refs, 14 agents, 12 commands) Verified: all 19 scripts pass --help, all 14 agent paths resolve, mkdocs builds clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: repair 25 Python scripts failing --help across all domains - Fix Python 3.10+ syntax (float | None → Optional[float]) in 2 scripts - Add argparse CLI handling to 9 marketing scripts using raw sys.argv - Fix 10 scripts crashing at module level (wrap in __main__, add argparse) - Make yaml/prefect/mcp imports conditional with stdlib fallbacks (4 scripts) - Fix f-string backslash syntax in project_bootstrapper.py - Fix -h flag conflict in pr_analyzer.py - Fix tech-debt.md description (score → prioritize) All 237 scripts now pass python3 --help verification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(product-team): close 3 verified gaps in product skills - Fix competitive-teardown/SKILL.md: replace broken references DATA_COLLECTION.md → references/data-collection-guide.md and TEMPLATES.md → references/analysis-templates.md (workflow was broken at steps 2 and 4) - Upgrade landing_page_scaffolder.py: add TSX + Tailwind output format (--format tsx) matching SKILL.md promise of Next.js/React components. 4 design styles (dark-saas, clean-minimal, bold-startup, enterprise). TSX is now default; HTML preserved via --format html - Rewrite README.md: fix stale counts (was 5 skills/15+ tools, now accurately shows 8 skills/9 tools), remove 7 ghost scripts that never existed (sprint_planner.py, velocity_tracker.py, etc.) - Fix tech-debt.md description (score → prioritize) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * release: v2.1.2 — landing page TSX output, brand voice integration, docs update - Landing page generator defaults to Next.js TSX + Tailwind CSS (4 design styles) - Brand voice analyzer integrated into landing page generation workflow - CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md, README.md updated for v2.1.2 - All 13 plugin.json + marketplace.json bumped to 2.1.2 - Gemini/Codex skill indexes re-synced - Backward compatible: --format html preserved, no breaking changes Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: alirezarezvani <5697919+alirezarezvani@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.5 KiB
7.5 KiB
Confluence Space Architecture Patterns
Overview
Well-organized Confluence spaces dramatically improve information discoverability and team productivity. This guide covers proven space organization patterns, page hierarchy best practices, and governance strategies.
Space Organization Patterns
Pattern 1: By Team
Each team or department gets its own space.
Structure:
Engineering Space (ENG)
Product Space (PROD)
Marketing Space (MKT)
Design Space (DES)
Support Space (SUP)
Pros:
- Clear ownership and permissions
- Teams control their own content
- Natural permission boundaries
- Easy to find team-specific content
Cons:
- Cross-team content duplication
- Silos between departments
- Hard to find project-spanning information
- Inconsistent practices across spaces
Best for: Organizations with stable teams and clear departmental boundaries
Pattern 2: By Project
Each major project or product gets its own space.
Structure:
Project Alpha Space (ALPHA)
Project Beta Space (BETA)
Platform Infrastructure Space (PLAT)
Internal Tools Space (TOOLS)
Pros:
- All project context in one place
- Easy onboarding for project members
- Clean archival when project completes
- Natural lifecycle management
Cons:
- Team knowledge scattered across spaces
- Permission management per project
- Space proliferation over time
- Ongoing vs project work separation unclear
Best for: Project-based organizations, agencies, consulting firms
Pattern 3: By Domain (Hybrid)
Combine functional spaces with cross-cutting project spaces.
Structure:
Company Wiki (WIKI) - Shared knowledge
Engineering Standards (ENG) - Team practices
Product Specs (PROD) - Requirements and roadmap
Project Alpha (ALPHA) - Cross-team project
Project Beta (BETA) - Cross-team project
Archive (ARCH) - Completed projects
Pros:
- Balances team and project needs
- Shared knowledge has a home
- Clear archival path
- Scales with organization growth
Cons:
- More complex to set up initially
- Requires governance to maintain
- Some ambiguity about where content belongs
Best for: Growing organizations, 50-500 people, multiple concurrent projects
Page Hierarchy Best Practices
Recommended Depth
- Maximum 4 levels deep - Deeper hierarchies become hard to navigate
- 3 levels ideal for most content types
- Use flat structures with labels for categorization beyond 4 levels
Standard Page Hierarchy
Space Home (overview, quick links, recent updates)
├── Getting Started
│ ├── Onboarding Guide
│ ├── Tool Setup
│ └── Key Contacts
├── Projects
│ ├── Project Alpha
│ │ ├── Requirements
│ │ ├── Design
│ │ └── Meeting Notes
│ └── Project Beta
├── Processes
│ ├── Development Workflow
│ ├── Release Process
│ └── On-Call Runbook
├── References
│ ├── Architecture Decisions
│ ├── API Documentation
│ └── Glossary
└── Archive
├── 2025 Projects
└── Deprecated Processes
Page Naming Conventions
- Use clear, descriptive titles (not abbreviations)
- Include date for time-sensitive content: "2025-Q1 Planning"
- Prefix meeting notes with date: "2025-03-15 Sprint Review"
- Use consistent casing (Title Case or Sentence case, not both)
- Avoid special characters that break URLs
Space Homepage Design
Every space homepage should include:
- Space purpose - One paragraph describing what this space is for
- Quick links - 5-7 most accessed pages
- Recent updates - Recently Updated macro filtered to this space
- Getting started - Link to onboarding content for new members
- Contact info - Space owner, key contributors
Labeling Taxonomy
Label Categories
- Content type:
meeting-notes,decision,specification,runbook,retrospective - Status:
draft,in-review,approved,deprecated,archived - Team:
team-engineering,team-product,team-design - Project:
project-alpha,project-beta - Priority:
high-priority,p1,critical
Labeling Best Practices
- Use lowercase, hyphenated labels (no spaces or camelCase)
- Define a standard label vocabulary and document it
- Use labels for cross-space categorization
- Combine labels with CQL for powerful search and reporting
- Audit labels quarterly to remove unused or inconsistent labels
- Limit to 3-5 labels per page (over-labeling reduces value)
CQL Examples for Label-Based Queries
# All meeting notes in a space
type = page AND space = "ENG" AND label = "meeting-notes"
# All approved specifications
type = page AND label = "specification" AND label = "approved"
# Recent decisions across all spaces
type = page AND label = "decision" AND lastModified > now("-30d")
Cross-Space Linking
When to Link vs Duplicate
- Link when content has a single source of truth
- Duplicate (Include Page macro) when content must appear in multiple contexts
- Excerpt Include when only a portion of a page is needed elsewhere
Linking Best Practices
- Use full page titles in links for clarity
- Add context around links ("See the [Architecture Decision Record] for rationale")
- Avoid orphan pages - every page should be reachable from space navigation
- Use the Recently Updated macro on hub pages for activity visibility
- Create "Related Pages" sections at the bottom of content pages
Archive Strategy
When to Archive
- Project completed more than 90 days ago
- Process or document officially deprecated
- Content not updated in 12+ months
- Replaced by newer content
Archive Process
- Add
archivedlabel to the page - Move to Archive section within the space (or dedicated Archive space)
- Add a note at the top: "This page is archived as of [date]. See [replacement] for current information."
- Update any incoming links to point to current content
- Do NOT delete - archived content has historical value
Archive Space Pattern
- Create a dedicated
Archivespace for completed projects - Move entire project page trees to Archive space on completion
- Set Archive space to read-only permissions
- Review Archive space annually for content that can be deleted
Permission Inheritance Patterns
Pattern 1: Open by Default
- All spaces readable by all employees
- Edit restricted to space members
- Admin restricted to space owners
- Best for: Transparency-focused organizations
Pattern 2: Restricted by Default
- Spaces accessible only to specific groups
- Request access via space admin
- Best for: Regulated industries, confidential projects
Pattern 3: Tiered Access
- Public tier: Company wiki, shared processes
- Team tier: Team-specific spaces with team access
- Restricted tier: HR, finance, legal with limited access
- Best for: Most organizations (balanced approach)
Permission Tips
- Use Confluence groups, not individual users, for permissions
- Align groups with LDAP/SSO groups where possible
- Audit permissions quarterly
- Document permission model on the space homepage
- Use page-level restrictions sparingly (breaks inheritance, hard to audit)
Scaling Considerations
< 50 People
- 3-5 spaces total
- Simple by-team pattern
- Light governance
50-200 People
- 10-20 spaces
- Hybrid pattern (team + project)
- Formal labeling taxonomy
- Quarterly content reviews
200+ People
- 20-50+ spaces
- Full domain pattern with governance
- Space owners and content stewards
- Automated archival policies
- Regular information architecture reviews