Files
claude-skills-reference/c-level-advisor/company-os/SKILL.md
Alireza Rezvani 466aa13a7b feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles (2→10) (#264)
* feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles

Add COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO advisors and Executive Mentor.
Expands C-level advisory from 2 to 10 roles with 74 total files.

Each role includes:
- SKILL.md (lean, <5KB, ~1200 tokens for context efficiency)
- Reference docs (loaded on demand, not at startup)
- Python analysis scripts (stdlib only, runnable CLI)

Executive Mentor features /em: slash commands (challenge, board-prep,
hard-call, stress-test, postmortem) with devil's advocate agent.

21 Python tools, 24 reference frameworks, 28,379 total lines.
All SKILL.md files combined: ~17K tokens (8.5% of 200K context window).

Badge: 88 → 116 skills

* feat: C-Suite orchestration layer + 18 complementary skills

ORCHESTRATION (new):
- cs-onboard: Founder interview → company-context.md
- chief-of-staff: Routing, synthesis, inter-agent orchestration
- board-meeting: 6-phase multi-agent deliberation protocol
- decision-logger: Two-layer memory (raw transcripts + approved decisions)
- agent-protocol: Inter-agent invocation with loop prevention
- context-engine: Company context loading + anonymization

CROSS-CUTTING CAPABILITIES (new):
- board-deck-builder: Board/investor update assembly
- scenario-war-room: Cascading multi-variable what-if modeling
- competitive-intel: Systematic competitor tracking + battlecards
- org-health-diagnostic: Cross-functional health scoring (8 dimensions)
- ma-playbook: M&A strategy (acquiring + being acquired)
- intl-expansion: International market entry frameworks

CULTURE & COLLABORATION (new):
- culture-architect: Values → behaviors, culture code, health assessment
- company-os: EOS/Scaling Up operating system selection + implementation
- founder-coach: Founder development, delegation, blind spots
- strategic-alignment: Strategy cascade, silo detection, alignment scoring
- change-management: ADKAR-based change rollout framework
- internal-narrative: One story across employees/investors/customers

UPGRADES TO EXISTING ROLES:
- All 10 roles get reasoning technique directives
- All 10 roles get company-context.md integration
- All 10 roles get board meeting isolation rules
- CEO gets stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed→C)

Key design decisions:
- Two-layer memory prevents hallucinated consensus from rejected ideas
- Phase 2 isolation: agents think independently before cross-examination
- Executive Mentor (The Critic) sees all perspectives, others don't
- 25 Python tools total (stdlib only, no dependencies)

52 new files, 10 modified, 10,862 new lines.
Total C-suite ecosystem: 134 files, 39,131 lines.

* fix: connect all dots — Chief of Staff routes to all 28 skills

- Added complementary skills registry to routing-matrix.md
- Chief of Staff SKILL.md now lists all 28 skills in ecosystem
- Added integration tables to scenario-war-room and competitive-intel
- Badge: 116 → 134 skills
- README: C-Level Advisory count 10 → 28

Quality audit passed:
 All 10 roles: company-context, reasoning, isolation, invocation
 All 6 phases in board meeting
 Two-layer memory with DO_NOT_RESURFACE
 Loop prevention (no self-invoke, max depth 2, no circular)
 All /em: commands present
 All complementary skills cross-reference roles
 Chief of Staff routes to every skill in ecosystem

* refactor: CEO + CTO advisors upgraded to C-suite parity

Both roles now match the structural standard of all new roles:
- CEO: 11.7KB → 6.8KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)
- CTO: 10KB → 7.2KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)

Added to both:
- Integration table (who they work with and when)
- Key diagnostic questions
- Structured metrics dashboard table
- Consistent section ordering (Keywords → Quick Start → Responsibilities → Questions → Metrics → Red Flags → Integration → Reasoning → Context)

CEO additions:
- Stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed=3m/6m/12m → B+=1y/3y/5y)
- Cross-references to culture-architect and board-deck-builder

CTO additions:
- Key Questions section (7 diagnostic questions)
- Structured metrics table (DORA + debt + team + architecture + cost)
- Cross-references to all peer roles

All 10 roles now pass structural parity:  Keywords  QuickStart  Questions  Metrics  RedFlags  Integration

* feat: add proactive triggers + output artifacts to all 10 roles

Every C-suite role now specifies:
- Proactive Triggers: 'surface these without being asked' — context-driven
  early warnings that make advisors proactive, not reactive
- Output Artifacts: concrete deliverables per request type (what you ask →
  what you get)

CEO: runway alerts, board prep triggers, strategy review nudges
CTO: deploy frequency monitoring, tech debt thresholds, bus factor flags
COO: blocker detection, scaling threshold warnings, cadence gaps
CPO: retention curve monitoring, portfolio dog detection, research gaps
CMO: CAC trend monitoring, positioning gaps, budget staleness
CFO: runway forecasting, burn multiple alerts, scenario planning gaps
CRO: NRR monitoring, pipeline coverage, pricing review triggers
CISO: audit overdue alerts, compliance gaps, vendor risk
CHRO: retention risk, comp band gaps, org scaling thresholds
Executive Mentor: board prep triggers, groupthink detection, hard call surfacing

This transforms the C-suite from reactive advisors into proactive partners.

* feat: User Communication Standard — structured output for all roles

Defines 3 output formats in agent-protocol/SKILL.md:

1. Standard Output: Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Risks → Your Decision
2. Proactive Alert: What I Noticed → Why It Matters → Action → Urgency (🔴🟡)
3. Board Meeting: Decision Required → Perspectives → Agree/Disagree → Critic → Action Items

10 non-negotiable rules:
- Bottom line first, always
- Results and decisions only (no process narration)
- What + Why + How for every finding
- Actions have owners and deadlines ('we should consider' is banned)
- Decisions framed as options with trade-offs
- Founder is the highest authority — roles recommend, founder decides
- Risks are concrete (if X → Y, costs $Z)
- Max 5 bullets per section
- No jargon without explanation
- Silence over fabricated updates

All 10 roles reference this standard.
Chief of Staff enforces it as a quality gate.
Board meeting Phase 4 uses the Board Meeting Output format.

* feat: Internal Quality Loop — verification before delivery

No role presents to the founder without passing verification:

Step 1: Self-Verification (every role, every time)
  - Source attribution: where did each data point come from?
  - Assumption audit: [VERIFIED] vs [ASSUMED] tags on every finding
  - Confidence scoring: 🟢 high / 🟡 medium / 🔴 low per finding
  - Contradiction check against company-context + decision log
  - 'So what?' test: every finding needs a business consequence

Step 2: Peer Verification (cross-functional)
  - Financial claims → CFO validates math
  - Revenue projections → CRO validates pipeline backing
  - Technical feasibility → CTO validates
  - People/hiring impact → CHRO validates
  - Skip for single-domain, low-stakes questions

Step 3: Critic Pre-Screen (high-stakes only)
  - Irreversible decisions, >20% runway impact, strategy changes
  - Executive Mentor finds weakest point before founder sees it
  - Suspicious consensus triggers mandatory pre-screen

Step 4: Course Correction (after founder feedback)
  - Approve → log + assign actions
  - Modify → re-verify changed parts
  - Reject → DO_NOT_RESURFACE + learn why
  - 30/60/90 day post-decision review

Board meeting contributions now require self-verified format with
confidence tags and source attribution on every finding.

* fix: resolve PR review issues 1, 4, and minor observation

Issue 1: c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md — completely rewritten
  - Was: 2 skills (CEO, CTO only), dated Nov 2025
  - Now: full 28-skill ecosystem map with architecture diagram,
    all roles/orchestration/cross-cutting/culture skills listed,
    design decisions, integration with other domains

Issue 4: Root CLAUDE.md — updated all stale counts
  - 87 → 134 skills across all 3 references
  - C-Level: 2 → 33 (10 roles + 5 mentor commands + 18 complementary)
  - Tool count: 160+ → 185+
  - Reference count: 200+ → 250+

Minor observation: Documented plugin.json convention
  - Explained in c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md that only executive-mentor
    has plugin.json because only it has slash commands (/em: namespace)
  - Other skills are invoked by name through Chief of Staff or directly

Also fixed: README.md 88+ → 134 in two places (first line + skills section)

* fix: update all plugin/index registrations for 28-skill C-suite

1. c-level-advisor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — v2.0.0
   - Was: 2 skills, generic description
   - Now: all 28 skills listed with descriptions, all 25 scripts,
     namespace 'cs', full ecosystem description

2. .codex/skills-index.json — added 18 complementary skills
   - Was: 10 roles only
   - Now: 28 total c-level entries (10 roles + 6 orchestration +
     6 cross-cutting + 6 culture)
   - Each with full description for skill discovery

3. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — updated c-level-skills entry
   - Was: generic 2-skill description
   - Now: v2.0.0, full 28-skill ecosystem description,
     skills_count: 28, scripts_count: 25

* feat: add root SKILL.md for c-level-advisor ClawHub package

---------

Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai>
2026-03-06 01:35:08 +01:00

10 KiB
Raw Blame History

name, description, license, metadata
name description license metadata
company-os The meta-framework for how a company runs — the connective tissue between all C-suite roles. Covers operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native, hybrid), accountability charts, scorecards, meeting pulse, issue resolution, and 90-day rocks. Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, building accountability systems, implementing OKRs, or when user mentions EOS, Scaling Up, operating system, L10 meetings, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, or quarterly planning. MIT
version author category domain updated frameworks
1.0.0 Alireza Rezvani c-level company-operations 2026-03-05 os-comparison, implementation-guide

Company Operating System

The operating system is the collection of tools, rhythms, and agreements that determine how the company functions. Every company has one — most just don't know what it is. Making it explicit makes it improvable.

Keywords

operating system, EOS, Entrepreneurial Operating System, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, Holacracy, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting pulse, quarterly planning, weekly scorecard, management framework, company rhythm, traction, Gino Wickman, Verne Harnish

Why This Matters

Most operational dysfunction isn't a people problem — it's a system problem. When:

  • The same issues recur every week: no issue resolution system
  • Meetings feel pointless: no structured meeting pulse
  • Nobody knows who owns what: no accountability chart
  • Quarterly goals slip: rocks aren't real commitments

Fix the system. The people will operate better inside it.

The Six Core Components

Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of which framework you choose:

1. Accountability Chart

Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"

Key distinction: One person owns each function. Multiple people may work in it. Ownership means the buck stops with one person.

Structure:

CEO
├── Sales (CRO/VP Sales)
│   ├── Inbound pipeline
│   └── Outbound pipeline
├── Product & Engineering (CTO/CPO)
│   ├── Product roadmap
│   └── Engineering delivery
├── Operations (COO)
│   ├── Customer success
│   └── Finance & Legal
└── People (CHRO/VP People)
    ├── Recruiting
    └── People operations

Rules:

  • No shared ownership. "Alice and Bob both own it" means nobody owns it.
  • One person can own multiple seats at early stages. That's fine. Just be explicit.
  • Revisit quarterly as you scale. Ownership shifts as the company grows.

Build it in a workshop:

  1. List all functions the company performs
  2. Assign one owner per function — no exceptions
  3. Identify gaps (functions nobody owns) and overlaps (functions two people think they own)
  4. Publish it. Update it when something changes.

2. Scorecard

Weekly metrics that tell you if the company is on track. Not monthly. Not quarterly. Weekly.

Rules:

  • 515 metrics maximum. More than 15 and nothing gets attention.
  • Each metric has an owner and a weekly target (not a range — a number).
  • Red/yellow/green status. Not paragraphs.
  • The scorecard is discussed at the leadership team weekly meeting. Only red metrics get discussion time.

Example scorecard structure:

Metric Owner Target This Week Status
New MRR CRO €50K €43K 🔴
Churn CS Lead < 1% 0.8% 🟢
Active users CPO 2,000 2,150 🟢
Deployments CTO 3/week 3 🟢
Open critical bugs CTO 0 2 🔴
Runway CFO > 18mo 16mo 🟡

Anti-pattern: Measuring everything. If you track 40 KPIs, you're watching, not managing.

3. Meeting Pulse

The meeting rhythm that drives the company. Not optional — the pulse is what keeps the company alive.

The full rhythm:

Meeting Frequency Duration Who Purpose
Daily standup Daily 15 min Each team Blockers only
L10 / Leadership sync Weekly 90 min Leadership team Scorecard + issues
Department review Monthly 60 min Dept + leadership OKR progress
Quarterly planning Quarterly 12 days Leadership Set rocks, review strategy
Annual planning Annual 23 days Leadership 1-year + 3-year vision

The L10 meeting (Weekly Leadership Sync): Named for the goal of each meeting being a 10/10. Fixed agenda:

  1. Good news (5 min) — personal + business
  2. Scorecard review (5 min) — flag red items only
  3. Rock review (5 min) — on/off track for each rock
  4. Customer/employee headlines (5 min)
  5. Issues list (60 min) — IDS (see below)
  6. To-dos review (5 min) — last week's commitments
  7. Conclude (5 min) — rate the meeting 110, what would make it a 10 next time

4. Issue Resolution (IDS)

The core problem-solving loop. Maximum 15 minutes per issue.

IDS: Identify, Discuss, Solve

  • Identify: What is the actual issue? (Not the symptom — the root cause) State it in one sentence.
  • Discuss: Relevant facts + perspectives. Time-boxed. When discussion starts repeating, stop.
  • Solve: One owner. One action. One due date. Written on the to-do list.

Anti-patterns:

  • "Let's take this offline" — most things taken offline never get resolved
  • Discussing without deciding — a great discussion with no action item is wasted time
  • Revisiting decided issues — once solved, it leaves the list. Reopen only with new information.

The Issues List: A running, prioritized list of all unresolved issues. Owned by the leadership team. Reviewed and pruned weekly. If an issue has been on the list for 3+ meetings and hasn't been discussed, it's either not a real issue or it's too scary to address — both deserve attention.

5. Rocks (90-Day Priorities)

Rocks are the 37 most important things each person must accomplish in the next 90 days. They're not the job description — they're the things that move the company forward.

Why 90 days? Long enough for meaningful progress. Short enough to stay real.

Rock rules:

  • Each person: 37 rocks maximum. More than 7 and none get done.
  • Company-level rocks (shared priorities): 37 for the leadership team
  • Each rock is binary: done or not done. No "60% complete."
  • Set at the quarterly planning session. Reviewed weekly (on/off track).

Bad rock: "Improve our sales process" Good rock: "Implement Salesforce CRM with full pipeline stages and weekly reporting by March 31"

Rock vs. to-do: A to-do takes one action. A rock takes 90 days of consistent work.

6. Communication Cadence

Who gets what information, when, and how.

Audience What When Format
All employees Company update Monthly Written + Q&A
All employees Quarterly results + next priorities Quarterly All-hands
Leadership team Scorecard Weekly Dashboard
Board Company performance Monthly Board memo
Investors Key metrics + narrative Monthly or quarterly Investor update
Customers Product updates Per release Release notes

Default rule: If you're deciding whether to share something internally, share it. The cost of under-communication always exceeds the cost of over-communication inside a company.


Operating System Selection

See references/os-comparison.md for full comparison. Quick guide:

If you are... Consider...
10250 person company, founder-led, operational chaos EOS / Traction
Ambitious growth company, need rigorous strategy cascade Scaling Up
Tech company, engineering culture, hypothesis-driven OKR-native
Decentralized, flat, high autonomy Holacracy (only if you're patient)
None of the above quite fit Custom hybrid

Implementation Roadmap

Don't implement everything at once. See references/implementation-guide.md for the full 90-day plan.

Quick start (first 30 days):

  1. Build the accountability chart (1 workshop, 2 hours)
  2. Define 510 weekly scorecard metrics (leadership team alignment, 1 hour)
  3. Start the weekly L10 meeting (no prep — just start)

These three alone will improve coordination more than most companies achieve in a year.


Common Failure Modes

Partial implementation: "We do OKRs but skip the weekly check-in." Half an operating system is worse than none — it creates theater without accountability.

Meeting fatigue: Adding the full rhythm on top of existing meetings. Start by replacing meetings, not adding them.

Metric overload: Starting with 30 KPIs because "they all matter." Start with 5. Add when the cadence is established.

Rock inflation: Setting 12 rocks per person because "everything is a priority." When everything is a priority, nothing is. Hard limit: 7.

Leader non-compliance: Leadership team skips the L10 or doesn't follow IDS. The operating system mirrors the respect leadership gives it. If leaders don't take it seriously, nobody will.

Annual planning without quarterly review: Setting annual goals and checking in at year-end. Quarterly is the minimum review cycle for any meaningful goal.


Integration with C-Suite

The company OS is the connective tissue. Every other role depends on it:

C-Suite Role OS Dependency
CEO Sets vision that feeds into 1-year plan and rocks
COO Owns the meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence
CFO Owns the financial metrics in the scorecard
CTO Owns engineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics
CHRO Owns people metrics (attrition, hiring velocity) in scorecard
Culture Architect Culture rituals plug into the meeting pulse
Strategic Alignment Engine Validates that team rocks cascade from company rocks

Key Questions for the Operating System

  • "If I asked five different team leads what the company's top 3 priorities are this quarter, would they give the same answers?"
  • "What was the most important issue raised in last week's leadership meeting? Was it resolved or is it still open?"
  • "Name a metric that would tell us by Friday whether this week was a good week. Do we track it?"
  • "Who owns customer churn? Can you name that person without hesitation?"
  • "When was the last time we updated the accountability chart?"

Detailed References

  • references/os-comparison.md — EOS vs Scaling Up vs OKRs vs Holacracy vs hybrid
  • references/implementation-guide.md — 90-day implementation plan