Technology Evaluation Metrics
Detailed metrics and calculations used in technology stack evaluation.
Table of Contents
Scoring and Comparison
Technology Comparison Matrix
| Metric |
Scale |
Description |
| Feature Completeness |
0-100 |
Coverage of required features |
| Learning Curve |
Easy/Medium/Hard |
Time to developer proficiency |
| Developer Experience |
0-100 |
Tooling, debugging, workflow quality |
| Documentation Quality |
0-10 |
Completeness, clarity, examples |
Weighted Scoring Algorithm
The comparator uses normalized weighted scoring:
Confidence Scoring
Confidence is calculated based on score gap between top options:
| Score Gap |
Confidence Level |
| < 5 points |
Low (40-50%) |
| 5-15 points |
Medium (50-70%) |
| > 15 points |
High (70-100%) |
Financial Calculations
TCO Components
Initial Costs (One-Time)
- Licensing fees
- Training:
team_size * hours_per_dev * hourly_rate + materials
- Migration costs
- Setup and tooling
Operational Costs (Annual)
- Licensing renewals
- Hosting:
base_cost * (1 + growth_rate)^(year - 1)
- Support contracts
- Maintenance:
team_size * hours_per_dev_monthly * hourly_rate * 12
Scaling Costs
- Infrastructure:
servers * cost_per_server * 12
- Cost per user:
total_yearly_cost / user_count
ROI Calculations
Cost Per Metric Reference
| Metric |
Description |
| Cost per user |
Monthly or yearly per active user |
| Cost per API request |
Average cost per 1000 requests |
| Cost per GB |
Storage and transfer costs |
| Cost per compute hour |
Processing time costs |
Ecosystem Health Metrics
GitHub Health Score (0-100)
| Metric |
Max Points |
Thresholds |
| Stars |
30 |
50K+: 30, 20K+: 25, 10K+: 20, 5K+: 15, 1K+: 10 |
| Forks |
20 |
10K+: 20, 5K+: 15, 2K+: 12, 1K+: 10 |
| Contributors |
20 |
500+: 20, 200+: 15, 100+: 12, 50+: 10 |
| Commits/month |
30 |
100+: 30, 50+: 25, 25+: 20, 10+: 15 |
npm Health Score (0-100)
| Metric |
Max Points |
Thresholds |
| Weekly downloads |
40 |
1M+: 40, 500K+: 35, 100K+: 30, 50K+: 25, 10K+: 20 |
| Major version |
20 |
v5+: 20, v3+: 15, v1+: 10 |
| Dependencies |
20 |
≤10: 20, ≤25: 15, ≤50: 10 (fewer is better) |
| Days since publish |
20 |
≤30: 20, ≤90: 15, ≤180: 10, ≤365: 5 |
| Metric |
Max Points |
Thresholds |
| Stack Overflow questions |
25 |
50K+: 25, 20K+: 20, 10K+: 15, 5K+: 10 |
| Job postings |
25 |
5K+: 25, 2K+: 20, 1K+: 15, 500+: 10 |
| Tutorials |
25 |
1K+: 25, 500+: 20, 200+: 15, 100+: 10 |
| Forum/Discord members |
25 |
50K+: 25, 20K+: 20, 10K+: 15, 5K+: 10 |
Corporate Backing Score
| Backing Type |
Score |
| Major tech company (Google, Microsoft, Meta) |
100 |
| Established company (Vercel, HashiCorp) |
80 |
| Funded startup |
60 |
| Community-led (strong community) |
40 |
| Individual maintainers |
20 |
Security Metrics
Security Scoring Components
| Metric |
Description |
| CVE Count (12 months) |
Known vulnerabilities in last year |
| CVE Count (3 years) |
Longer-term vulnerability history |
| Severity Distribution |
Critical/High/Medium/Low counts |
| Patch Frequency |
Average days to patch vulnerabilities |
Compliance Readiness Levels
| Level |
Score Range |
Description |
| Ready |
90-100% |
Meets compliance requirements |
| Mostly Ready |
70-89% |
Minor gaps to address |
| Partial |
50-69% |
Significant work needed |
| Not Ready |
< 50% |
Major gaps exist |
Compliance Framework Coverage
GDPR
- Data privacy features
- Consent management
- Data portability
- Right to deletion
SOC2
- Access controls
- Encryption at rest/transit
- Audit logging
- Change management
HIPAA
- PHI handling
- Encryption standards
- Access controls
- Audit trails
Migration Metrics
Complexity Scoring (1-10 Scale)
| Factor |
Weight |
Description |
| Code Changes |
30% |
Lines of code affected |
| Architecture Impact |
25% |
Breaking changes, API compatibility |
| Data Migration |
25% |
Schema changes, data transformation |
| Downtime Requirements |
20% |
Zero-downtime possible vs planned outage |
Effort Estimation
| Phase |
Components |
| Development |
Hours per component * complexity factor |
| Testing |
Unit + integration + E2E hours |
| Training |
Team size * learning curve hours |
| Buffer |
20-30% for unknowns |
Risk Assessment Matrix
| Risk Category |
Factors Evaluated |
| Technical |
API incompatibilities, performance regressions |
| Business |
Downtime impact, feature parity gaps |
| Team |
Learning curve, skill gaps |
Performance Benchmarks
Throughput/Latency Metrics
| Metric |
Description |
| RPS |
Requests per second |
| Avg Response Time |
Mean response latency (ms) |
| P95 Latency |
95th percentile response time |
| P99 Latency |
99th percentile response time |
| Concurrent Users |
Maximum simultaneous connections |
Resource Usage Metrics
| Metric |
Unit |
| Memory |
MB/GB per instance |
| CPU |
Utilization percentage |
| Storage |
GB required |
| Network |
Bandwidth MB/s |
Scalability Characteristics
| Type |
Description |
| Horizontal |
Add more instances, efficiency factor |
| Vertical |
CPU/memory limits per instance |
| Cost per Performance |
Dollar per 1000 RPS |
| Scaling Inflection |
Point where cost efficiency changes |