- AgentHub: 13 files updated with non-engineering examples (content drafts, research, strategy) — engineering stays primary, cross-domain secondary - AgentHub: 7 slash commands, 5 Python scripts, 3 references, 1 agent, dry_run.py validation (57 checks) - Marketplace: agenthub entry added with cross-domain keywords, engineering POWERFUL updated (25→30), product (12→13), counts synced across all configs - SEO: generate-docs.py now produces keyword-rich <title> tags and meta descriptions using SKILL.md frontmatter — "Claude Code Skills" in site_name propagates to all 276 HTML pages - SEO: per-domain title suffixes (Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw, etc.), slug-as-title cleanup, domain label stripping from titles - Broken links: 141→0 warnings — new rewrite_skill_internal_links() converts references/, scripts/, assets/ links to GitHub source URLs; skills/index.md phantom slugs fixed (6 marketing, 7 RA/QM) - Counts synced: 204 skills, 266 tools, 382 refs, 16 agents, 17 commands, 21 plugins — consistent across CLAUDE.md, README.md, docs/index.md, marketplace.json, getting-started.md, mkdocs.yml - Platform sync: Codex 163 skills, Gemini 246 items, OpenClaw compatible Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.6 KiB
5.6 KiB
title, description
| title | description |
|---|---|
| Performance Profiler — Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw | Performance Profiler. Agent skill for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw. |
Performance Profiler
:material-rocket-launch: Engineering - POWERFUL
:material-identifier: `performance-profiler`
:material-github: Source
Install:
claude /plugin install engineering-advanced-skills
Tier: POWERFUL
Category: Engineering
Domain: Performance Engineering
Overview
Systematic performance profiling for Node.js, Python, and Go applications. Identifies CPU, memory, and I/O bottlenecks; generates flamegraphs; analyzes bundle sizes; optimizes database queries; detects memory leaks; and runs load tests with k6 and Artillery. Always measures before and after.
Core Capabilities
- CPU profiling — flamegraphs for Node.js, py-spy for Python, pprof for Go
- Memory profiling — heap snapshots, leak detection, GC pressure
- Bundle analysis — webpack-bundle-analyzer, Next.js bundle analyzer
- Database optimization — EXPLAIN ANALYZE, slow query log, N+1 detection
- Load testing — k6 scripts, Artillery scenarios, ramp-up patterns
- Before/after measurement — establish baseline, profile, optimize, verify
When to Use
- App is slow and you don't know where the bottleneck is
- P99 latency exceeds SLA before a release
- Memory usage grows over time (suspected leak)
- Bundle size increased after adding dependencies
- Preparing for a traffic spike (load test before launch)
- Database queries taking >100ms
Quick Start
# Analyze a project for performance risk indicators
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project
# JSON output for CI integration
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project --json
# Custom large-file threshold
python3 scripts/performance_profiler.py /path/to/project --large-file-threshold-kb 256
Golden Rule: Measure First
# Establish baseline BEFORE any optimization
# Record: P50, P95, P99 latency | RPS | error rate | memory usage
# Wrong: "I think the N+1 query is slow, let me fix it"
# Right: Profile → confirm bottleneck → fix → measure again → verify improvement
Node.js Profiling
→ See references/profiling-recipes.md for details
Before/After Measurement Template
## Performance Optimization: [What You Fixed]
**Date:** 2026-03-01
**Engineer:** @username
**Ticket:** PROJ-123
### Problem
[1-2 sentences: what was slow, how was it observed]
### Root Cause
[What the profiler revealed]
### Baseline (Before)
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| P50 latency | 480ms |
| P95 latency | 1,240ms |
| P99 latency | 3,100ms |
| RPS @ 50 VUs | 42 |
| Error rate | 0.8% |
| DB queries/req | 23 (N+1) |
Profiler evidence: [link to flamegraph or screenshot]
### Fix Applied
[What changed — code diff or description]
### After
| Metric | Before | After | Delta |
|--------|--------|-------|-------|
| P50 latency | 480ms | 48ms | -90% |
| P95 latency | 1,240ms | 120ms | -90% |
| P99 latency | 3,100ms | 280ms | -91% |
| RPS @ 50 VUs | 42 | 380 | +804% |
| Error rate | 0.8% | 0% | -100% |
| DB queries/req | 23 | 1 | -96% |
### Verification
Load test run: [link to k6 output]
Optimization Checklist
Quick wins (check these first)
Database
□ Missing indexes on WHERE/ORDER BY columns
□ N+1 queries (check query count per request)
□ Loading all columns when only 2-3 needed (SELECT *)
□ No LIMIT on unbounded queries
□ Missing connection pool (creating new connection per request)
Node.js
□ Sync I/O (fs.readFileSync) in hot path
□ JSON.parse/stringify of large objects in hot loop
□ Missing caching for expensive computations
□ No compression (gzip/brotli) on responses
□ Dependencies loaded in request handler (move to module level)
Bundle
□ Moment.js → dayjs/date-fns
□ Lodash (full) → lodash/function imports
□ Static imports of heavy components → dynamic imports
□ Images not optimized / not using next/image
□ No code splitting on routes
API
□ No pagination on list endpoints
□ No response caching (Cache-Control headers)
□ Serial awaits that could be parallel (Promise.all)
□ Fetching related data in a loop instead of JOIN
Common Pitfalls
- Optimizing without measuring — you'll optimize the wrong thing
- Testing in development — profile against production-like data volumes
- Ignoring P99 — P50 can look fine while P99 is catastrophic
- Premature optimization — fix correctness first, then performance
- Not re-measuring — always verify the fix actually improved things
- Load testing production — use staging with production-size data
Best Practices
- Baseline first, always — record metrics before touching anything
- One change at a time — isolate the variable to confirm causation
- Profile with realistic data — 10 rows in dev, millions in prod — different bottlenecks
- Set performance budgets —
p(95) < 200msin CI thresholds with k6 - Monitor continuously — add Datadog/Prometheus metrics for key paths
- Cache invalidation strategy — cache aggressively, invalidate precisely
- Document the win — before/after in the PR description motivates the team