diff --git a/docs/breezehost-nc1-routing-resolution.md b/docs/breezehost-nc1-routing-resolution.md
deleted file mode 100644
index b1a0ec9..0000000
--- a/docs/breezehost-nc1-routing-resolution.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,93 +0,0 @@
-# NC1 Inter-Datacenter Routing Resolution
-
-**Date:** February 9, 2026  
-**Ticket:** #5ae82fd3  
-**Issue:** TX1 Dallas ↔ NC1 Charlotte could not communicate  
-**Resolution Time:** ~4.5 hours  
-**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED
-
----
-
-## Problem Statement
-
-TX1 (Dallas) and NC1 (Charlotte) could not communicate directly with each other, preventing:
-- Uptime Kuma monitoring of NC1 from Command Center
-- Cross-datacenter database architecture
-- BungeeCord/Velocity proxy networks
-- Direct server-to-server backups
-
----
-
-## Diagnostic Work
-
-**Test 1: TX1 → NC1 (Dallas to Charlotte)**
-```
-root@TX1# ping -c 4 216.239.104.130
-From 38.68.14.25 icmp_seq=1 Destination Net Unreachable
---- 100% packet loss ---
-```
-Result: TX1's gateway immediately returned "Network Unreachable"
-
-**Test 2: NC1 → TX1 (Charlotte to Dallas)**
-```
-root@NC1# traceroute -n 38.68.14.26
-1  216.239.104.129  0.092 ms
-2  * * *
-[times out after 9 hops]
-```
-Result: Asymmetric routing - NC1 could route toward Dallas but packets timed out
-
-**Test 3: Firewall Check**
-```
-root@TX1# ufw status numbered | grep 216.239
-[no results]
-```
-Result: Not a firewall issue - pure routing problem
-
----
-
-## Root Cause
-
-Missing routing table entry on Breezehost's infrastructure to allow inter-datacenter communication between Dallas and Charlotte facilities.
-
----
-
-## Resolution
-
-**Breezehost Action:** "Just needed a route added on our end" - Brandon E, Feb 9, 2026
-
-**Verification:**
-```
-root@command-center# ping -c 3 216.239.104.130
-3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss
-```
-
-**Impact:**
-- ✅ NC1 now fully monitored by Uptime Kuma (100% uptime)
-- ✅ Cross-datacenter architecture options enabled
-- ✅ Complete infrastructure visibility
-
----
-
-## Lessons Learned
-
-1. **Diagnostic work pays off:** Providing comprehensive test results (ping, traceroute, firewall checks) enabled fast resolution
-2. **Ask before assuming:** We assumed inter-DC isolation was intentional - it wasn't
-3. **Breezehost is responsive:** 4.5 hour turnaround on infrastructure routing changes
-4. **Document everything:** Having ticket history enables future reference
-
----
-
-## Future Opportunities Unlocked
-
-Now that TX1 ↔ NC1 communication works, we can explore:
-- Centralized MySQL/PostgreSQL database (single instance, both datacenters)
-- BungeeCord/Velocity proxy networks (seamless player transfers)
-- Direct backup replication (NC1 → TX1 or vice versa)
-- Load balancing across datacenters
-- Failover architectures
-
----
-
-**Breezehost Contact:** Brandon E (Staff)  
-**Appreciation:** "Like always, you guys are legends, I appreciate you" - Michael