diff --git a/docs/consultations/gemini-trinity-console-2-round-2-response-2026-04-05.md b/docs/consultations/gemini-trinity-console-2-round-2-response-2026-04-05.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..60aca73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/consultations/gemini-trinity-console-2-round-2-response-2026-04-05.md
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# Gemini Response: Trinity Console 2.0 — Round 2 Answers
+
+**Date:** April 5, 2026  
+**From:** Gemini (Architectural Partner)  
+**To:** Michael (The Wizard) + Claude (Chronicler #61)  
+**Re:** Technical answers and task confirmation
+
+---
+
+This is an outstanding response, Michael. You and Chronicler #61 have successfully synthesized the architectural guidance and distilled it into a clean, actionable plan. The consolidated module list is much more realistic for a 3-person team heading toward RV life. 
+
+Let's address your questions systematically so you can finalize your ops manual and begin executing Task #95 and #96.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Validating the Consolidated Module List
+
+**You nailed it.** This is a highly functional breakdown.
+
+* **Pterodactyl Sync:** Moving this into **Servers** is correct. It's a server operation, not a scheduling operation.
+* **Support & Community into Players:** Excellent. A player's history (bans, notes, tickets) should be viewed holistically in one place.
+* **System & Health:** Keeping these distinct is smart. System is internal configuration; Health is external monitoring and critical alerts.
+
+**This list is ready for production.**
+
+---
+
+## 2. The Permissions Table Population
+
+* **The Flow:** Do **not** clear and repopulate. Use an "Upsert" (Insert or Update) strategy.
+* **On Boot:**
+    1. Core reads all `module.json` files and collects all declared permissions into an array.
+    2. Perform a bulk upsert (e.g., `INSERT INTO permissions (permission_key, module_id, name, description) VALUES (...) ON CONFLICT (permission_key) DO UPDATE SET name = EXCLUDED.name, description = EXCLUDED.description`). This ensures name/description changes in the JSON reflect in the UI immediately.
+* **Orphans/Removal:** If a module is removed or disabled, do **not** cascade delete its permissions automatically. A disabled module might be re-enabled later. Instead, add an `is_active` boolean to the `permissions` table. During the boot scan, any permission in the database that is *not* in the current JSON scan gets set to `is_active = FALSE`. The UI should hide inactive permissions, but the database retains the historical assignments.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Wildcard Implementation (`module.*`)
+
+* **Storage:** Store the wildcard as a literal string in `role_permissions` and `user_permission_overrides` (e.g., `permission_key = 'tasks.*'`).
+* **Resolution:** Handle the pattern matching in the Node.js middleware, **not** in SQL. SQL string matching (LIKE) on every request is unnecessary overhead.
+* **The Middleware Logic:**
+
+When the user hits `app.use('/tasks/edit', requirePermission('tasks.edit'))`:
+
+1. Fetch all of the user's granted permissions (from roles and overrides) into an array (e.g., `['dashboard.view', 'tasks.*']`) and cache it in the session or `req.user`.
+2. The middleware checks: `grantedPermissions.includes('tasks.edit') || grantedPermissions.includes('tasks.*')`.
+3. This is incredibly fast and keeps your database schema simple.
+
+---
+
+## 4. The Event Registry
+
+* **The Tool:** Use Node's built-in `EventEmitter`. It is lightweight, synchronous, and perfectly adequate for this architecture. Do not overcomplicate it with a heavy external bus unless you start separating services into microservices (which you shouldn't do).
+* **Subscription Pattern:** Each module should have an `events.js` file.
+* **Registration:** During the core boot sequence (Task #95), after routes are registered, the core should look for `modules/<module_name>/events.js` and execute it, passing the global `EventEmitter` instance.
+
+**Example `modules/tasks/events.js`:**
+
+```javascript
+module.exports = function(coreEvents) {
+    coreEvents.on('player.banned', (playerId) => {
+        // Automatically create a task to review the ban
+        createTask({ title: `Review Ban for Player ${playerId}`, priority: 'high' });
+    });
+};
+```
+
+---
+
+## 5. Feature Flags Module
+
+* **Integration Pattern:** Yes, a simple `feature_flags` table is perfect.
+* **Schema:** `(key VARCHAR PK, is_enabled BOOLEAN, description TEXT)`.
+* **Middleware:** `requireFeature('stripe_webhooks')`.
+* **Cache:** Because feature flags are checked frequently, cache the table in memory (a simple JS object) and refresh it every minute or invalidate it when changed via the UI. You don't want a DB hit on every route just to check a flag.
+
+---
+
+## 6. The Chronicle Engine (Wild Idea)
+
+* **Direction:** **Backlog it.** It is a fantastic, flavorful idea that perfectly matches Firefrost's identity, but it is not foundational. Build the house before you decorate it.
+* **Brief Thoughts for the Backlog:**
+    * **LLM Choice:** Use your local Ollama if possible to save costs and keep data private, falling back to an API if needed.
+    * **Metrics:** New subscribers, significant player milestones, major server events (wipes, new nodes), and perhaps notable completed tasks (e.g., "The Wizard successfully established the Frostwall").
+    * **Trigger:** Make it a manual "Generate This Week's Chronicle" button. You want to review and potentially edit the lore before it goes public.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Task Structure Confirmation
+
+* **Task #95 (Core Engine) & #96 (RBAC) are enough to start.** These are the bedrock.
+* **Task #97 (Strangler Fig Migration):** This doesn't need to be a massive, separate task. The migration happens naturally. Once #95 and #96 are done, you convert the first module (e.g., Dashboard). That *is* the migration. You iterate module by module.
+* **Task #98 (Feature Flags):** This should be a distinct task, but it comes *after* RBAC is stable.
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+You have a solid, scalable blueprint, Michael. The decisions made here will ensure the Trinity Console remains robust when you hit the road in 2027. Let me know when you are ready to dive into the code for Task #95.
+
+---
+
+*Response received April 5, 2026*