6d261ce801
- Correct source accessibility: distinguish circular verification (forbidden) from exclusive information advantage (encouraged) - Add Counter-Review Team with 5 specialized agents (claim-validator, source-diversity-checker, recency-validator, contradiction-finder, counter-review-coordinator) - Add Enterprise Research Mode: 6-dimension data collection framework with SWOT, competitive barrier, and risk matrix analysis - Update version to 2.4.0 - Add comprehensive reference docs: - source_accessibility_policy.md - V6_1_improvements.md - counter_review_team_guide.md - enterprise_analysis_frameworks.md - enterprise_quality_checklist.md - enterprise_research_methodology.md - quality_gates.md - report_template_v6.md - research_notes_format.md - subagent_prompt.md Based on "深度推理" case study methodology lessons learned. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
83 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
83 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# {{TITLE}}
|
|
|
|
> 研究日期: {{DATE}} | 来源数量: {{SOURCE_COUNT}} | 字数: ~{{WORD_COUNT}} | 模式: {{MODE}} | AS_OF: {{AS_OF}} | 官方源占比: {{OFFICIAL_SHARE}}
|
|
|
|
## 摘要 / Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
{{200-400 words summarizing key findings, methodology, conclusions, and risks.}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 目录
|
|
|
|
{{Auto-generate from actual section headers below.}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{{BODY SECTIONS — Adapt to topic type and include opposing interpretation per section.}}
|
|
|
|
For each section:
|
|
|
|
## N. [Topic-Specific Section Title]
|
|
|
|
{{Section content with inline citations [1][2].
|
|
Standard mode: 500-1000 words per section.
|
|
Lightweight mode: 300-600 words per section.
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
- 每个事实性论点都需要引用 [n]
|
|
- 数字/百分比必须有来源
|
|
- 出现不同证据时要成对给出支持与反驳
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
**置信度:** High/Medium/Low
|
|
|
|
**依据:** {{Why this confidence level — source agreement, evidence quality, data availability}}
|
|
|
|
**反方解释:** {{One explicit opposing interpretation with supporting citations if any, or [unverified] if insufficient.}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
{{COUNTER-REVIEW SUMMARY}}
|
|
|
|
- **核心争议 1:** [主张 A 与反向证据 B 对比] [n][m]
|
|
- **核心争议 2:** ...
|
|
|
|
## 关键发现 / Key Findings
|
|
|
|
{{3-5 findings in Standard mode, 2-3 in Lightweight. Each finding should:}}
|
|
- 具体结论
|
|
- 对应引文
|
|
- 信心说明
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
- **发现 1:** [Most important discovery] [3][7]
|
|
- **发现 2:** [Second most important] [1][4]
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 局限性与未来方向 / Limitations & Future Directions
|
|
|
|
### 本研究局限
|
|
{{Be explicit:
|
|
- What topics/angles couldn't be covered and why
|
|
- Methodological limits (web-accessible sources, paywall, language, timing)
|
|
- Source coverage gaps and counter-claim evidence gaps
|
|
}}
|
|
|
|
### 未来方向
|
|
{{Concrete suggestions for follow-up research with priority and responsible evidence type.}}
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 参考文献 / References
|
|
|
|
[1] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: official/academic/secondary-industry/journalism/community/other. As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL.
|
|
[2] Author/Org. "Title". Source-Type: ... As Of: YYYY-MM-DD. URL.
|
|
|
|
Rules:
|
|
- Every [n] in body MUST have matching entry here
|
|
- Every entry here MUST be cited at least once
|
|
- Source-Type and As Of fields are mandatory
|
|
- All URLs MUST come from actual search results (P2 source pool)
|