- Correct source accessibility: distinguish circular verification (forbidden) from exclusive information advantage (encouraged) - Add Counter-Review Team with 5 specialized agents (claim-validator, source-diversity-checker, recency-validator, contradiction-finder, counter-review-coordinator) - Add Enterprise Research Mode: 6-dimension data collection framework with SWOT, competitive barrier, and risk matrix analysis - Update version to 2.4.0 - Add comprehensive reference docs: - source_accessibility_policy.md - V6_1_improvements.md - counter_review_team_guide.md - enterprise_analysis_frameworks.md - enterprise_quality_checklist.md - enterprise_research_methodology.md - quality_gates.md - report_template_v6.md - research_notes_format.md - subagent_prompt.md Based on "深度推理" case study methodology lessons learned. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
182 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
182 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
# Counter-Review Team 使用指南
|
||
|
||
Deep Research V6 P6 阶段的专用 Agent Team,并行执行多维度审查。
|
||
|
||
## Team 架构
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
counter-review-coordinator (协调者)
|
||
├── claim-validator (声明验证器)
|
||
├── source-diversity-checker (来源多样性检查器)
|
||
├── recency-validator (时效性验证器)
|
||
└── contradiction-finder (矛盾发现器)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## Agent 职责
|
||
|
||
| Agent | 职责 | 输出 |
|
||
|-------|------|------|
|
||
| **claim-validator** | 验证声明准确性,识别无证据/弱证据声明 | Claim Validation Report |
|
||
| **source-diversity-checker** | 检查单一来源依赖,source-type 分布 | Source Diversity Report |
|
||
| **recency-validator** | 验证时敏声明的新鲜度,AS_OF 合规 | Recency Validation Report |
|
||
| **contradiction-finder** | 发现内部矛盾,缺失的反向观点 | Contradiction and Bias Report |
|
||
| **counter-review-coordinator** | 整合所有报告,生成最终 P6 报告 | P6 Counter-Review Report |
|
||
|
||
## 使用流程
|
||
|
||
### 1. 准备输入材料
|
||
|
||
在 P5 (Draft) 完成后,收集以下材料:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
inputs/
|
||
├── draft_report.md # P5 起草的报告
|
||
├── citation_registry.md # P3 的引用注册表
|
||
├── task-notes/
|
||
│ ├── task-a.md # 子代理研究笔记
|
||
│ ├── task-b.md
|
||
│ └── ...
|
||
└── p0_config.md # P0 配置 (AS_OF 日期, Mode 等)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 2. 并行分发任务
|
||
|
||
向 4 个 specialist agent 同时发送任务:
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# 向 claim-validator 发送
|
||
SendMessage to: claim-validator
|
||
输入: draft_report.md + citation_registry.md + task-notes/
|
||
指令: 验证所有声明的证据支持
|
||
|
||
# 向 source-diversity-checker 发送
|
||
SendMessage to: source-diversity-checker
|
||
输入: draft_report.md + citation_registry.md
|
||
指令: 检查来源多样性和单一来源依赖
|
||
|
||
# 向 recency-validator 发送
|
||
SendMessage to: recency-validator
|
||
输入: draft_report.md + citation_registry.md + p0_config.md
|
||
指令: 验证时敏声明的新鲜度
|
||
|
||
# 向 contradiction-finder 发送
|
||
SendMessage to: contradiction-finder
|
||
输入: draft_report.md + task-notes/ + citation_registry.md
|
||
指令: 发现矛盾和缺失的反向观点
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 3. 协调汇总
|
||
|
||
等待 4 个 specialist 完成后,发送给 coordinator:
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
SendMessage to: counter-review-coordinator
|
||
输入:
|
||
- Claim Validation Report
|
||
- Source Diversity Report
|
||
- Recency Validation Report
|
||
- Contradiction and Bias Report
|
||
指令: 整合所有报告,生成最终 P6 Counter-Review Report
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 4. 获取最终输出
|
||
|
||
Coordinator 输出包含:
|
||
- 问题汇总(必须 ≥3 个)
|
||
- 关键争议部分(可直接复制到最终报告)
|
||
- 强制修复清单
|
||
- 质量门状态
|
||
|
||
## 质量门要求
|
||
|
||
| 检查项 | 标准模式 | 轻量模式 | 失败处理 |
|
||
|--------|---------|---------|---------|
|
||
| 发现问题数 | ≥3 | ≥3 | 重新审查 |
|
||
| 关键声明单来源 | 0 | 0 | 补充来源或降级 |
|
||
| 官方来源占比 | ≥30% | ≥20% | 补充官方来源 |
|
||
| AS_OF 日期完整 | 100% | 100% | 补充日期 |
|
||
| 核心争议文档化 | 必填 | 必填 | 补充争议部分 |
|
||
|
||
## 输出示例
|
||
|
||
### Coordinator 最终报告结构
|
||
|
||
```markdown
|
||
# P6 Counter-Review Report
|
||
|
||
## Executive Summary
|
||
- Total issues found: 7 (critical: 2, high: 3, medium: 2)
|
||
- Must-fix before publish: 2
|
||
- Recommended improvements: 5
|
||
|
||
## Critical Issues (Block Publish)
|
||
| # | Issue | Location | Source | Fix Required |
|
||
|---|-------|----------|--------|--------------|
|
||
| 1 | 市场份额声明无来源 | 3.2节 | 无 | 补充来源或删除 |
|
||
| 2 | 单一社区来源支持收入数据 | 4.1节 | [12] community | 找官方来源替代 |
|
||
|
||
## 核心争议 / Key Controversies
|
||
|
||
- **争议 1:** 公司声称增长 50% vs 分析师报告增长 30%
|
||
- 证据强度: official(公司财报) vs academic(第三方研究)
|
||
- 建议: 并列呈现两种数据,说明差异原因
|
||
|
||
## Mandatory Fixes Checklist
|
||
- [ ] 补充 3.2 节市场份额来源
|
||
- [ ] 替换 4.1 节收入数据来源
|
||
- [ ] 添加 AS_OF: 2026-04-03 到所有时敏声明
|
||
|
||
## Quality Gates Status
|
||
| Gate | Status | Notes |
|
||
|------|--------|-------|
|
||
| P6 ≥3 issues found | ✅ | 发现 7 个问题 |
|
||
| No critical claim single-sourced | ❌ | 2 个问题待修复 |
|
||
| AS_OF dates present | ❌ | 3 处缺失 |
|
||
| Counter-claims documented | ✅ | 已添加 |
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 集成到 SKILL.md 工作流
|
||
|
||
在 SKILL.md 的 P6 阶段,添加以下指令:
|
||
|
||
```markdown
|
||
## P6: Counter-Review (Mandatory)
|
||
|
||
**使用 Counter-Review Team 执行并行审查:**
|
||
|
||
1. **准备材料**: draft_report.md, citation_registry.md, task-notes/, p0_config.md
|
||
2. **并行分发**: 同时发送给 4 个 specialist agent
|
||
3. **等待完成**: 收集 4 份 specialist 报告
|
||
4. **协调汇总**: 发送给 coordinator 生成最终 P6 报告
|
||
5. **强制执行**: 所有 Critical 问题必须在 P7 前修复
|
||
6. **输出**: 将"核心争议"部分复制到最终报告
|
||
|
||
**Report**: `[P6 complete] {N} issues found: {critical} critical, {high} high, {medium} medium.`
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 团队管理
|
||
|
||
### 查看团队状态
|
||
```bash
|
||
cat ~/.claude/teams/counter-review-team/config.json
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 向 Agent 发送消息
|
||
```bash
|
||
SendMessage to: claim-validator
|
||
message: 开始审查任务,输入文件在 ./review-inputs/
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### 关闭团队
|
||
```bash
|
||
SendMessage to: "*"
|
||
message: {"type": "shutdown_request", "reason": "任务完成"}
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 注意事项
|
||
|
||
1. **必须发现 ≥3 个问题** - 如果 coordinator 报告 <3 个问题,需要重新审查
|
||
2. **Critical 问题必须修复** - 才能进入 P7
|
||
3. **保留所有审查记录** - 作为研究方法论的一部分
|
||
4. **中文输入中文输出** - 所有 agent 支持中英文双语
|