Files
claude-skills-reference/c-level-advisor/decision-logger/scripts/decision_tracker.py
Alireza Rezvani 466aa13a7b feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles (2→10) (#264)
* feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles

Add COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO advisors and Executive Mentor.
Expands C-level advisory from 2 to 10 roles with 74 total files.

Each role includes:
- SKILL.md (lean, <5KB, ~1200 tokens for context efficiency)
- Reference docs (loaded on demand, not at startup)
- Python analysis scripts (stdlib only, runnable CLI)

Executive Mentor features /em: slash commands (challenge, board-prep,
hard-call, stress-test, postmortem) with devil's advocate agent.

21 Python tools, 24 reference frameworks, 28,379 total lines.
All SKILL.md files combined: ~17K tokens (8.5% of 200K context window).

Badge: 88 → 116 skills

* feat: C-Suite orchestration layer + 18 complementary skills

ORCHESTRATION (new):
- cs-onboard: Founder interview → company-context.md
- chief-of-staff: Routing, synthesis, inter-agent orchestration
- board-meeting: 6-phase multi-agent deliberation protocol
- decision-logger: Two-layer memory (raw transcripts + approved decisions)
- agent-protocol: Inter-agent invocation with loop prevention
- context-engine: Company context loading + anonymization

CROSS-CUTTING CAPABILITIES (new):
- board-deck-builder: Board/investor update assembly
- scenario-war-room: Cascading multi-variable what-if modeling
- competitive-intel: Systematic competitor tracking + battlecards
- org-health-diagnostic: Cross-functional health scoring (8 dimensions)
- ma-playbook: M&A strategy (acquiring + being acquired)
- intl-expansion: International market entry frameworks

CULTURE & COLLABORATION (new):
- culture-architect: Values → behaviors, culture code, health assessment
- company-os: EOS/Scaling Up operating system selection + implementation
- founder-coach: Founder development, delegation, blind spots
- strategic-alignment: Strategy cascade, silo detection, alignment scoring
- change-management: ADKAR-based change rollout framework
- internal-narrative: One story across employees/investors/customers

UPGRADES TO EXISTING ROLES:
- All 10 roles get reasoning technique directives
- All 10 roles get company-context.md integration
- All 10 roles get board meeting isolation rules
- CEO gets stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed→C)

Key design decisions:
- Two-layer memory prevents hallucinated consensus from rejected ideas
- Phase 2 isolation: agents think independently before cross-examination
- Executive Mentor (The Critic) sees all perspectives, others don't
- 25 Python tools total (stdlib only, no dependencies)

52 new files, 10 modified, 10,862 new lines.
Total C-suite ecosystem: 134 files, 39,131 lines.

* fix: connect all dots — Chief of Staff routes to all 28 skills

- Added complementary skills registry to routing-matrix.md
- Chief of Staff SKILL.md now lists all 28 skills in ecosystem
- Added integration tables to scenario-war-room and competitive-intel
- Badge: 116 → 134 skills
- README: C-Level Advisory count 10 → 28

Quality audit passed:
 All 10 roles: company-context, reasoning, isolation, invocation
 All 6 phases in board meeting
 Two-layer memory with DO_NOT_RESURFACE
 Loop prevention (no self-invoke, max depth 2, no circular)
 All /em: commands present
 All complementary skills cross-reference roles
 Chief of Staff routes to every skill in ecosystem

* refactor: CEO + CTO advisors upgraded to C-suite parity

Both roles now match the structural standard of all new roles:
- CEO: 11.7KB → 6.8KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)
- CTO: 10KB → 7.2KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)

Added to both:
- Integration table (who they work with and when)
- Key diagnostic questions
- Structured metrics dashboard table
- Consistent section ordering (Keywords → Quick Start → Responsibilities → Questions → Metrics → Red Flags → Integration → Reasoning → Context)

CEO additions:
- Stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed=3m/6m/12m → B+=1y/3y/5y)
- Cross-references to culture-architect and board-deck-builder

CTO additions:
- Key Questions section (7 diagnostic questions)
- Structured metrics table (DORA + debt + team + architecture + cost)
- Cross-references to all peer roles

All 10 roles now pass structural parity:  Keywords  QuickStart  Questions  Metrics  RedFlags  Integration

* feat: add proactive triggers + output artifacts to all 10 roles

Every C-suite role now specifies:
- Proactive Triggers: 'surface these without being asked' — context-driven
  early warnings that make advisors proactive, not reactive
- Output Artifacts: concrete deliverables per request type (what you ask →
  what you get)

CEO: runway alerts, board prep triggers, strategy review nudges
CTO: deploy frequency monitoring, tech debt thresholds, bus factor flags
COO: blocker detection, scaling threshold warnings, cadence gaps
CPO: retention curve monitoring, portfolio dog detection, research gaps
CMO: CAC trend monitoring, positioning gaps, budget staleness
CFO: runway forecasting, burn multiple alerts, scenario planning gaps
CRO: NRR monitoring, pipeline coverage, pricing review triggers
CISO: audit overdue alerts, compliance gaps, vendor risk
CHRO: retention risk, comp band gaps, org scaling thresholds
Executive Mentor: board prep triggers, groupthink detection, hard call surfacing

This transforms the C-suite from reactive advisors into proactive partners.

* feat: User Communication Standard — structured output for all roles

Defines 3 output formats in agent-protocol/SKILL.md:

1. Standard Output: Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Risks → Your Decision
2. Proactive Alert: What I Noticed → Why It Matters → Action → Urgency (🔴🟡)
3. Board Meeting: Decision Required → Perspectives → Agree/Disagree → Critic → Action Items

10 non-negotiable rules:
- Bottom line first, always
- Results and decisions only (no process narration)
- What + Why + How for every finding
- Actions have owners and deadlines ('we should consider' is banned)
- Decisions framed as options with trade-offs
- Founder is the highest authority — roles recommend, founder decides
- Risks are concrete (if X → Y, costs $Z)
- Max 5 bullets per section
- No jargon without explanation
- Silence over fabricated updates

All 10 roles reference this standard.
Chief of Staff enforces it as a quality gate.
Board meeting Phase 4 uses the Board Meeting Output format.

* feat: Internal Quality Loop — verification before delivery

No role presents to the founder without passing verification:

Step 1: Self-Verification (every role, every time)
  - Source attribution: where did each data point come from?
  - Assumption audit: [VERIFIED] vs [ASSUMED] tags on every finding
  - Confidence scoring: 🟢 high / 🟡 medium / 🔴 low per finding
  - Contradiction check against company-context + decision log
  - 'So what?' test: every finding needs a business consequence

Step 2: Peer Verification (cross-functional)
  - Financial claims → CFO validates math
  - Revenue projections → CRO validates pipeline backing
  - Technical feasibility → CTO validates
  - People/hiring impact → CHRO validates
  - Skip for single-domain, low-stakes questions

Step 3: Critic Pre-Screen (high-stakes only)
  - Irreversible decisions, >20% runway impact, strategy changes
  - Executive Mentor finds weakest point before founder sees it
  - Suspicious consensus triggers mandatory pre-screen

Step 4: Course Correction (after founder feedback)
  - Approve → log + assign actions
  - Modify → re-verify changed parts
  - Reject → DO_NOT_RESURFACE + learn why
  - 30/60/90 day post-decision review

Board meeting contributions now require self-verified format with
confidence tags and source attribution on every finding.

* fix: resolve PR review issues 1, 4, and minor observation

Issue 1: c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md — completely rewritten
  - Was: 2 skills (CEO, CTO only), dated Nov 2025
  - Now: full 28-skill ecosystem map with architecture diagram,
    all roles/orchestration/cross-cutting/culture skills listed,
    design decisions, integration with other domains

Issue 4: Root CLAUDE.md — updated all stale counts
  - 87 → 134 skills across all 3 references
  - C-Level: 2 → 33 (10 roles + 5 mentor commands + 18 complementary)
  - Tool count: 160+ → 185+
  - Reference count: 200+ → 250+

Minor observation: Documented plugin.json convention
  - Explained in c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md that only executive-mentor
    has plugin.json because only it has slash commands (/em: namespace)
  - Other skills are invoked by name through Chief of Staff or directly

Also fixed: README.md 88+ → 134 in two places (first line + skills section)

* fix: update all plugin/index registrations for 28-skill C-suite

1. c-level-advisor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — v2.0.0
   - Was: 2 skills, generic description
   - Now: all 28 skills listed with descriptions, all 25 scripts,
     namespace 'cs', full ecosystem description

2. .codex/skills-index.json — added 18 complementary skills
   - Was: 10 roles only
   - Now: 28 total c-level entries (10 roles + 6 orchestration +
     6 cross-cutting + 6 culture)
   - Each with full description for skill discovery

3. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — updated c-level-skills entry
   - Was: generic 2-skill description
   - Now: v2.0.0, full 28-skill ecosystem description,
     skills_count: 28, scripts_count: 25

* feat: add root SKILL.md for c-level-advisor ClawHub package

---------

Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai>
2026-03-06 01:35:08 +01:00

621 lines
23 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters
This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
decision_tracker.py — Board Meeting Decision Parser & Reporter
Part of the C-Level Advisor / Decision Logger skill.
Parses memory/board-meetings/decisions.md and produces actionable reports.
Stdlib only. No dependencies.
Usage:
python decision_tracker.py --summary
python decision_tracker.py --overdue
python decision_tracker.py --conflicts
python decision_tracker.py --owner "CMO"
python decision_tracker.py --search "pricing"
python decision_tracker.py --due-within 7
python decision_tracker.py --demo # Run with sample data
"""
import argparse
import os
import re
import sys
from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Optional
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Data structures
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
class ActionItem:
def __init__(self, text: str, owner: str, due: Optional[date],
review: Optional[date], completed: bool, completed_date: Optional[date],
result: str):
self.text = text
self.owner = owner
self.due = due
self.review = review
self.completed = completed
self.completed_date = completed_date
self.result = result
def is_overdue(self) -> bool:
if self.completed:
return False
if self.due and self.due < date.today():
return True
return False
def is_due_within(self, days: int) -> bool:
if self.completed:
return False
if self.due:
return date.today() <= self.due <= date.today() + timedelta(days=days)
return False
class Decision:
def __init__(self):
self.date: Optional[date] = None
self.title: str = ""
self.decision: str = ""
self.owner: str = ""
self.deadline: Optional[date] = None
self.review: Optional[date] = None
self.rationale: str = ""
self.user_override: str = ""
self.rejected: list[str] = []
self.action_items: list[ActionItem] = []
self.supersedes: str = ""
self.superseded_by: str = ""
self.raw_transcript: str = ""
def is_active(self) -> bool:
return not bool(self.superseded_by.strip())
def has_override(self) -> bool:
return bool(self.user_override.strip())
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Parser
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def parse_date(s: str) -> Optional[date]:
"""Parse YYYY-MM-DD or return None."""
if not s:
return None
s = s.strip()
for fmt in ("%Y-%m-%d", "%Y/%m/%d", "%d.%m.%Y"):
try:
return datetime.strptime(s, fmt).date()
except ValueError:
continue
return None
def parse_action_item(line: str) -> Optional[ActionItem]:
"""
Parse a line like:
- [ ] Action text — Owner: CMO — Due: 2026-03-15 — Review: 2026-03-29
- [x] Action text — Owner: CEO — Completed: 2026-03-10 — Result: Done
"""
line = line.strip()
if not line.startswith("- ["):
return None
completed = line.startswith("- [x]") or line.startswith("- [X]")
text_start = line.find("]") + 1
raw = line[text_start:].strip()
# Split on " — " (em dash with spaces) or " - " fallback
parts_raw = re.split(r"\s+[—\-]{1,2}\s+", raw)
text = parts_raw[0].strip() if parts_raw else raw
def extract(label: str, parts: list[str]) -> str:
for p in parts:
if p.lower().startswith(label.lower() + ":"):
return p[len(label) + 1:].strip()
return ""
owner = extract("Owner", parts_raw[1:])
due_str = extract("Due", parts_raw[1:])
review_str = extract("Review", parts_raw[1:])
completed_str = extract("Completed", parts_raw[1:])
result = extract("Result", parts_raw[1:])
return ActionItem(
text=text,
owner=owner,
due=parse_date(due_str),
review=parse_date(review_str),
completed=completed,
completed_date=parse_date(completed_str),
result=result,
)
def parse_decisions(content: str) -> list[Decision]:
"""Parse the full decisions.md content into Decision objects."""
decisions = []
current: Optional[Decision] = None
in_rejected = False
in_actions = False
for line in content.splitlines():
# New decision entry
header_match = re.match(r"^## (\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}) — (.+)$", line)
if header_match:
if current:
decisions.append(current)
current = Decision()
current.date = parse_date(header_match.group(1))
current.title = header_match.group(2).strip()
in_rejected = False
in_actions = False
continue
if current is None:
continue
# Field parsing
def extract_field(label: str) -> Optional[str]:
pattern = rf"^\*\*{re.escape(label)}:\*\*\s*(.*)$"
m = re.match(pattern, line)
return m.group(1).strip() if m else None
val = extract_field("Decision")
if val is not None:
current.decision = val
in_rejected = False
in_actions = False
continue
val = extract_field("Owner")
if val is not None:
current.owner = val
continue
val = extract_field("Deadline")
if val is not None:
current.deadline = parse_date(val)
continue
val = extract_field("Review")
if val is not None:
current.review = parse_date(val)
continue
val = extract_field("Rationale")
if val is not None:
current.rationale = val
continue
val = extract_field("User Override")
if val is not None:
current.user_override = val
in_rejected = False
in_actions = False
continue
val = extract_field("Supersedes")
if val is not None:
current.supersedes = val
continue
val = extract_field("Superseded by")
if val is not None:
current.superseded_by = val
continue
val = extract_field("Raw transcript")
if val is not None:
current.raw_transcript = val
continue
# Section headers
if re.match(r"^\*\*Rejected:\*\*", line):
in_rejected = True
in_actions = False
continue
if re.match(r"^\*\*Action Items:\*\*", line):
in_actions = True
in_rejected = False
continue
if line.startswith("**"):
in_rejected = False
in_actions = False
# List items
if in_rejected and line.strip().startswith("-"):
item = line.strip().lstrip("- ").strip()
if item and not item.startswith("<!--"):
current.rejected.append(item)
continue
if in_actions and line.strip().startswith("- ["):
action = parse_action_item(line)
if action:
current.action_items.append(action)
continue
if current:
decisions.append(current)
return decisions
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Reports
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def fmt_date(d: Optional[date]) -> str:
return d.strftime("%Y-%m-%d") if d else ""
def fmt_delta(d: Optional[date]) -> str:
if not d:
return ""
delta = (d - date.today()).days
if delta < 0:
return f" ⚠️ {abs(delta)}d overdue"
if delta == 0:
return " 🔴 DUE TODAY"
if delta <= 3:
return f" 🟡 {delta}d left"
return f" ({delta}d)"
def print_section(title: str):
print(f"\n{'' * 60}")
print(f" {title}")
print(f"{'' * 60}")
def report_summary(decisions: list[Decision]):
active = [d for d in decisions if d.is_active()]
all_actions = [a for d in decisions for a in d.action_items]
open_actions = [a for a in all_actions if not a.completed]
overdue = [a for a in all_actions if a.is_overdue()]
overrides = [d for d in decisions if d.has_override()]
dnr_count = sum(len(d.rejected) for d in decisions)
print_section("DECISION LOG SUMMARY")
print(f" Total decisions: {len(decisions)}")
print(f" Active (not super.): {len(active)}")
print(f" Superseded: {len(decisions) - len(active)}")
print(f" Founder overrides: {len(overrides)}")
print(f" DO_NOT_RESURFACE: {dnr_count}")
print(f" Total action items: {len(all_actions)}")
print(f" Open action items: {len(open_actions)}")
print(f" Overdue: {len(overdue)}")
if overdue:
print(f"\n {'' * 40}")
print(f" ⚠️ OVERDUE ITEMS ({len(overdue)})")
print(f" {'' * 40}")
for a in overdue:
print(f" • [{a.owner}] {a.text}")
print(f" Due: {fmt_date(a.due)}{fmt_delta(a.due)}")
print(f"\n {'' * 40}")
print(f" RECENT DECISIONS")
print(f" {'' * 40}")
for d in sorted(active, key=lambda x: x.date or date.min, reverse=True)[:5]:
print(f" [{fmt_date(d.date)}] {d.title}")
print(f" Owner: {d.owner or ''} | Deadline: {fmt_date(d.deadline)}")
open_count = sum(1 for a in d.action_items if not a.completed)
if open_count:
print(f" Open actions: {open_count}")
def report_overdue(decisions: list[Decision]):
print_section("OVERDUE ACTION ITEMS")
found = False
for d in sorted(decisions, key=lambda x: x.date or date.min, reverse=True):
overdue = [a for a in d.action_items if a.is_overdue()]
if not overdue:
continue
found = True
print(f"\n 📋 {d.title} [{fmt_date(d.date)}]")
for a in overdue:
print(f" ⚠️ {a.text}")
print(f" Owner: {a.owner or ''} | Due: {fmt_date(a.due)}{fmt_delta(a.due)}")
if not found:
print("\n ✅ No overdue items.")
def report_due_within(decisions: list[Decision], days: int):
print_section(f"ACTION ITEMS DUE WITHIN {days} DAYS")
found = False
for d in sorted(decisions, key=lambda x: x.date or date.min, reverse=True):
upcoming = [a for a in d.action_items if a.is_due_within(days)]
if not upcoming:
continue
found = True
print(f"\n 📋 {d.title} [{fmt_date(d.date)}]")
for a in upcoming:
print(f"{a.text}")
print(f" Owner: {a.owner or ''} | Due: {fmt_date(a.due)}{fmt_delta(a.due)}")
if not found:
print(f"\n ✅ Nothing due in the next {days} days.")
def report_by_owner(decisions: list[Decision], owner: str):
print_section(f"ACTION ITEMS — OWNER: {owner.upper()}")
found = False
for d in sorted(decisions, key=lambda x: x.date or date.min, reverse=True):
items = [a for a in d.action_items
if a.owner.lower() == owner.lower() and not a.completed]
if not items:
continue
found = True
print(f"\n 📋 {d.title} [{fmt_date(d.date)}]")
for a in items:
flag = "⚠️ OVERDUE" if a.is_overdue() else ""
print(f" {'[ ]'} {a.text} {flag}")
print(f" Due: {fmt_date(a.due)}{fmt_delta(a.due)}")
if not found:
print(f"\n No open action items for '{owner}'.")
def report_search(decisions: list[Decision], query: str):
print_section(f"SEARCH: \"{query}\"")
q = query.lower()
found = False
for d in decisions:
hit_fields = []
if q in d.title.lower():
hit_fields.append("title")
if q in d.decision.lower():
hit_fields.append("decision")
if q in d.rationale.lower():
hit_fields.append("rationale")
if any(q in r.lower() for r in d.rejected):
hit_fields.append("rejected")
if hit_fields:
found = True
print(f"\n [{fmt_date(d.date)}] {d.title} (match: {', '.join(hit_fields)})")
if "decision" in hit_fields:
print(f"{d.decision}")
if "rejected" in hit_fields:
matches = [r for r in d.rejected if q in r.lower()]
for r in matches:
print(f" ✗ [REJECTED] {r}")
if not found:
print(f"\n No results for '{query}'.")
def report_conflicts(decisions: list[Decision]):
"""
Simple conflict detection: look for decisions on the same topic
(matching title words) that are both active and have different decisions.
Also flag if a rejected item appears as a new decision.
"""
print_section("CONFLICT DETECTION")
conflicts_found = False
# Check for DO_NOT_RESURFACE violations
all_rejected_texts = []
for d in decisions:
for r in d.rejected:
clean = re.sub(r"\[DO_NOT_RESURFACE\]", "", r).strip().lower()
all_rejected_texts.append((clean, d.date, d.title))
active = [d for d in decisions if d.is_active()]
for d in active:
decision_lower = d.decision.lower()
for rejected_text, rejected_date, rejected_title in all_rejected_texts:
if rejected_text and rejected_text in decision_lower:
conflicts_found = True
print(f"\n 🚫 POTENTIAL DO_NOT_RESURFACE VIOLATION")
print(f" Decision [{fmt_date(d.date)}]: {d.decision}")
print(f" Matches rejected item from [{fmt_date(rejected_date)}] ({rejected_title}):")
print(f" \"{rejected_text}\"")
# Check for same-topic contradictions (shared keywords in title)
stop_words = {"the", "a", "an", "and", "or", "to", "for", "of", "in", "on", "with", "vs"}
for i, d1 in enumerate(active):
words1 = set(w.lower() for w in d1.title.split() if w.lower() not in stop_words)
for d2 in active[i+1:]:
words2 = set(w.lower() for w in d2.title.split() if w.lower() not in stop_words)
overlap = words1 & words2
if len(overlap) >= 2 and d1.decision and d2.decision:
# Different decisions on similar topic
if d1.decision.lower() != d2.decision.lower():
conflicts_found = True
print(f"\n ⚠️ POTENTIAL CONFLICT (shared topic: {overlap})")
print(f" [{fmt_date(d1.date)}] {d1.title}")
print(f" Decision: {d1.decision}")
print(f" [{fmt_date(d2.date)}] {d2.title}")
print(f" Decision: {d2.decision}")
if d1.superseded_by or d2.superseded_by:
print(f" One may supersede the other — check Superseded by fields.")
if not conflicts_found:
print("\n ✅ No conflicts detected.")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Sample data for --demo mode
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
SAMPLE_DECISIONS_MD = f"""# Board Meeting Decisions — Layer 2
This file contains ONLY founder-approved decisions.
---
## 2026-02-15 — Spain Market Expansion
**Decision:** Expand to Spain in Q3 2026 with a pilot in Madrid and Barcelona.
**Owner:** CMO
**Deadline:** 2026-03-01
**Review:** 2026-04-01
**Rationale:** Market research shows 40% lower CAC than Germany. Two pilot customers already committed.
**User Override:** Founder reduced pilot scope from 5 cities to 2. Reason: reduce operational risk during expansion.
**Rejected:**
- Launch in all of Spain simultaneously — too resource-intensive at current headcount [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
- Partner with a local distributor instead of direct sales — margins too low [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
**Action Items:**
- [x] Hire Spanish-speaking CSM — Owner: CHRO — Completed: 2026-02-28 — Result: Hired Maria G., starts March 10
- [ ] Finalize Madrid pilot customer contracts — Owner: CRO — Due: {(date.today() - timedelta(days=3)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-04-01
- [ ] Translate app to Spanish (ES-ES) — Owner: CTO — Due: {(date.today() + timedelta(days=5)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-04-15
**Supersedes:**
**Superseded by:**
**Raw transcript:** memory/board-meetings/2026-02-15-raw.md
---
## 2026-02-28 — Pricing Strategy Revision
**Decision:** Move from per-seat to usage-based pricing effective Q2 2026.
**Owner:** CFO
**Deadline:** 2026-03-20
**Review:** 2026-05-01
**Rationale:** Usage-based aligns with customer value. Three enterprise customers requested it explicitly.
**User Override:**
**Rejected:**
- Freemium tier — not appropriate for enterprise healthcare segment [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
- Raise prices 30% across the board — too aggressive without usage data [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
**Action Items:**
- [ ] Model 3 pricing scenarios (conservative/base/aggressive) — Owner: CFO — Due: {(date.today() - timedelta(days=1)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-03-25
- [ ] Customer interviews on usage patterns (n=10) — Owner: CMO — Due: {(date.today() + timedelta(days=10)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-04-01
- [ ] Update billing infrastructure for usage tracking — Owner: CTO — Due: 2026-04-01 — Review: 2026-04-15
**Supersedes:**
**Superseded by:**
**Raw transcript:** memory/board-meetings/2026-02-28-raw.md
---
## 2026-03-04 — Engineering Hiring Plan Q2
**Decision:** Hire 2 senior engineers in Q2: one ML/AI, one backend. No contractors.
**Owner:** CTO
**Deadline:** 2026-04-15
**Review:** 2026-05-01
**Rationale:** ML roadmap blocked. Backend capacity at 85%. Contractors rejected due to IP risk in regulated domain.
**User Override:** Founder added: "ML hire must have healthcare AI experience. Non-negotiable."
**Rejected:**
- Contract team of 5 for 3 months — IP risk in regulated domain [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
- Hire junior engineers to save budget — wrong tradeoff at this stage [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]
**Action Items:**
- [ ] Post ML engineer JD — Owner: CHRO — Due: {(date.today() + timedelta(days=2)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-03-20
- [ ] Post backend engineer JD — Owner: CHRO — Due: {(date.today() + timedelta(days=2)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-03-20
- [ ] Define ML role requirements with healthcare AI spec — Owner: CTO — Due: {(date.today() + timedelta(days=1)).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')} — Review: 2026-03-15
**Supersedes:**
**Superseded by:**
**Raw transcript:** memory/board-meetings/2026-03-04-raw.md
"""
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Main
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def load_decisions(decisions_path: Path, demo: bool) -> list[Decision]:
if demo:
content = SAMPLE_DECISIONS_MD
elif decisions_path.exists():
content = decisions_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
else:
print(f" ⚠️ decisions.md not found at: {decisions_path}")
print(f" Run with --demo to see sample output.")
print(f" To initialize: mkdir -p memory/board-meetings && touch memory/board-meetings/decisions.md")
sys.exit(1)
return parse_decisions(content)
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description="Board Meeting Decision Tracker",
formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
epilog=__doc__,
)
parser.add_argument("--file", default="memory/board-meetings/decisions.md",
help="Path to decisions.md (default: memory/board-meetings/decisions.md)")
parser.add_argument("--demo", action="store_true",
help="Run with built-in sample data (no file needed)")
parser.add_argument("--summary", action="store_true",
help="Show overview: counts, overdue, recent decisions")
parser.add_argument("--overdue", action="store_true",
help="List all overdue action items")
parser.add_argument("--due-within", type=int, metavar="DAYS",
help="List items due within N days")
parser.add_argument("--owner", metavar="ROLE",
help="Filter action items by owner")
parser.add_argument("--search", metavar="QUERY",
help="Search decisions and rejected proposals")
parser.add_argument("--conflicts", action="store_true",
help="Check for contradictory decisions or DO_NOT_RESURFACE violations")
parser.add_argument("--all", action="store_true",
help="Show all decisions (summary format)")
args = parser.parse_args()
if not any([args.summary, args.overdue, args.due_within, args.owner,
args.search, args.conflicts, getattr(args, "all")]):
args.summary = True # Default action
decisions_path = Path(args.file)
decisions = load_decisions(decisions_path, args.demo)
if not decisions:
print(" No decisions found in decisions.md.")
sys.exit(0)
if args.demo:
print(f"\n 🎯 DEMO MODE — using built-in sample data ({len(decisions)} decisions)")
if args.summary:
report_summary(decisions)
if args.overdue:
report_overdue(decisions)
if args.due_within:
report_due_within(decisions, args.due_within)
if args.owner:
report_by_owner(decisions, args.owner)
if args.search:
report_search(decisions, args.search)
if args.conflicts:
report_conflicts(decisions)
if getattr(args, "all"):
print_section(f"ALL DECISIONS ({len(decisions)} total)")
for d in sorted(decisions, key=lambda x: x.date or date.min, reverse=True):
status = "📦 SUPERSEDED" if not d.is_active() else ""
override = " [OVERRIDE]" if d.has_override() else ""
print(f"\n [{fmt_date(d.date)}] {d.title} {status}{override}")
print(f" Decision: {d.decision}")
print(f" Owner: {d.owner or ''} | Deadline: {fmt_date(d.deadline)}")
open_actions = [a for a in d.action_items if not a.completed]
if open_actions:
print(f" Open actions: {len(open_actions)}")
print()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()