* feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles Add COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO advisors and Executive Mentor. Expands C-level advisory from 2 to 10 roles with 74 total files. Each role includes: - SKILL.md (lean, <5KB, ~1200 tokens for context efficiency) - Reference docs (loaded on demand, not at startup) - Python analysis scripts (stdlib only, runnable CLI) Executive Mentor features /em: slash commands (challenge, board-prep, hard-call, stress-test, postmortem) with devil's advocate agent. 21 Python tools, 24 reference frameworks, 28,379 total lines. All SKILL.md files combined: ~17K tokens (8.5% of 200K context window). Badge: 88 → 116 skills * feat: C-Suite orchestration layer + 18 complementary skills ORCHESTRATION (new): - cs-onboard: Founder interview → company-context.md - chief-of-staff: Routing, synthesis, inter-agent orchestration - board-meeting: 6-phase multi-agent deliberation protocol - decision-logger: Two-layer memory (raw transcripts + approved decisions) - agent-protocol: Inter-agent invocation with loop prevention - context-engine: Company context loading + anonymization CROSS-CUTTING CAPABILITIES (new): - board-deck-builder: Board/investor update assembly - scenario-war-room: Cascading multi-variable what-if modeling - competitive-intel: Systematic competitor tracking + battlecards - org-health-diagnostic: Cross-functional health scoring (8 dimensions) - ma-playbook: M&A strategy (acquiring + being acquired) - intl-expansion: International market entry frameworks CULTURE & COLLABORATION (new): - culture-architect: Values → behaviors, culture code, health assessment - company-os: EOS/Scaling Up operating system selection + implementation - founder-coach: Founder development, delegation, blind spots - strategic-alignment: Strategy cascade, silo detection, alignment scoring - change-management: ADKAR-based change rollout framework - internal-narrative: One story across employees/investors/customers UPGRADES TO EXISTING ROLES: - All 10 roles get reasoning technique directives - All 10 roles get company-context.md integration - All 10 roles get board meeting isolation rules - CEO gets stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed→C) Key design decisions: - Two-layer memory prevents hallucinated consensus from rejected ideas - Phase 2 isolation: agents think independently before cross-examination - Executive Mentor (The Critic) sees all perspectives, others don't - 25 Python tools total (stdlib only, no dependencies) 52 new files, 10 modified, 10,862 new lines. Total C-suite ecosystem: 134 files, 39,131 lines. * fix: connect all dots — Chief of Staff routes to all 28 skills - Added complementary skills registry to routing-matrix.md - Chief of Staff SKILL.md now lists all 28 skills in ecosystem - Added integration tables to scenario-war-room and competitive-intel - Badge: 116 → 134 skills - README: C-Level Advisory count 10 → 28 Quality audit passed: ✅ All 10 roles: company-context, reasoning, isolation, invocation ✅ All 6 phases in board meeting ✅ Two-layer memory with DO_NOT_RESURFACE ✅ Loop prevention (no self-invoke, max depth 2, no circular) ✅ All /em: commands present ✅ All complementary skills cross-reference roles ✅ Chief of Staff routes to every skill in ecosystem * refactor: CEO + CTO advisors upgraded to C-suite parity Both roles now match the structural standard of all new roles: - CEO: 11.7KB → 6.8KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references) - CTO: 10KB → 7.2KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references) Added to both: - Integration table (who they work with and when) - Key diagnostic questions - Structured metrics dashboard table - Consistent section ordering (Keywords → Quick Start → Responsibilities → Questions → Metrics → Red Flags → Integration → Reasoning → Context) CEO additions: - Stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed=3m/6m/12m → B+=1y/3y/5y) - Cross-references to culture-architect and board-deck-builder CTO additions: - Key Questions section (7 diagnostic questions) - Structured metrics table (DORA + debt + team + architecture + cost) - Cross-references to all peer roles All 10 roles now pass structural parity: ✅ Keywords ✅ QuickStart ✅ Questions ✅ Metrics ✅ RedFlags ✅ Integration * feat: add proactive triggers + output artifacts to all 10 roles Every C-suite role now specifies: - Proactive Triggers: 'surface these without being asked' — context-driven early warnings that make advisors proactive, not reactive - Output Artifacts: concrete deliverables per request type (what you ask → what you get) CEO: runway alerts, board prep triggers, strategy review nudges CTO: deploy frequency monitoring, tech debt thresholds, bus factor flags COO: blocker detection, scaling threshold warnings, cadence gaps CPO: retention curve monitoring, portfolio dog detection, research gaps CMO: CAC trend monitoring, positioning gaps, budget staleness CFO: runway forecasting, burn multiple alerts, scenario planning gaps CRO: NRR monitoring, pipeline coverage, pricing review triggers CISO: audit overdue alerts, compliance gaps, vendor risk CHRO: retention risk, comp band gaps, org scaling thresholds Executive Mentor: board prep triggers, groupthink detection, hard call surfacing This transforms the C-suite from reactive advisors into proactive partners. * feat: User Communication Standard — structured output for all roles Defines 3 output formats in agent-protocol/SKILL.md: 1. Standard Output: Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Risks → Your Decision 2. Proactive Alert: What I Noticed → Why It Matters → Action → Urgency (🔴🟡⚪) 3. Board Meeting: Decision Required → Perspectives → Agree/Disagree → Critic → Action Items 10 non-negotiable rules: - Bottom line first, always - Results and decisions only (no process narration) - What + Why + How for every finding - Actions have owners and deadlines ('we should consider' is banned) - Decisions framed as options with trade-offs - Founder is the highest authority — roles recommend, founder decides - Risks are concrete (if X → Y, costs $Z) - Max 5 bullets per section - No jargon without explanation - Silence over fabricated updates All 10 roles reference this standard. Chief of Staff enforces it as a quality gate. Board meeting Phase 4 uses the Board Meeting Output format. * feat: Internal Quality Loop — verification before delivery No role presents to the founder without passing verification: Step 1: Self-Verification (every role, every time) - Source attribution: where did each data point come from? - Assumption audit: [VERIFIED] vs [ASSUMED] tags on every finding - Confidence scoring: 🟢 high / 🟡 medium / 🔴 low per finding - Contradiction check against company-context + decision log - 'So what?' test: every finding needs a business consequence Step 2: Peer Verification (cross-functional) - Financial claims → CFO validates math - Revenue projections → CRO validates pipeline backing - Technical feasibility → CTO validates - People/hiring impact → CHRO validates - Skip for single-domain, low-stakes questions Step 3: Critic Pre-Screen (high-stakes only) - Irreversible decisions, >20% runway impact, strategy changes - Executive Mentor finds weakest point before founder sees it - Suspicious consensus triggers mandatory pre-screen Step 4: Course Correction (after founder feedback) - Approve → log + assign actions - Modify → re-verify changed parts - Reject → DO_NOT_RESURFACE + learn why - 30/60/90 day post-decision review Board meeting contributions now require self-verified format with confidence tags and source attribution on every finding. * fix: resolve PR review issues 1, 4, and minor observation Issue 1: c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md — completely rewritten - Was: 2 skills (CEO, CTO only), dated Nov 2025 - Now: full 28-skill ecosystem map with architecture diagram, all roles/orchestration/cross-cutting/culture skills listed, design decisions, integration with other domains Issue 4: Root CLAUDE.md — updated all stale counts - 87 → 134 skills across all 3 references - C-Level: 2 → 33 (10 roles + 5 mentor commands + 18 complementary) - Tool count: 160+ → 185+ - Reference count: 200+ → 250+ Minor observation: Documented plugin.json convention - Explained in c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md that only executive-mentor has plugin.json because only it has slash commands (/em: namespace) - Other skills are invoked by name through Chief of Staff or directly Also fixed: README.md 88+ → 134 in two places (first line + skills section) * fix: update all plugin/index registrations for 28-skill C-suite 1. c-level-advisor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — v2.0.0 - Was: 2 skills, generic description - Now: all 28 skills listed with descriptions, all 25 scripts, namespace 'cs', full ecosystem description 2. .codex/skills-index.json — added 18 complementary skills - Was: 10 roles only - Now: 28 total c-level entries (10 roles + 6 orchestration + 6 cross-cutting + 6 culture) - Each with full description for skill discovery 3. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — updated c-level-skills entry - Was: generic 2-skill description - Now: v2.0.0, full 28-skill ecosystem description, skills_count: 28, scripts_count: 25 * feat: add root SKILL.md for c-level-advisor ClawHub package --------- Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai>
174 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
174 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
# Anonymization Protocol
|
||
|
||
Rules for stripping sensitive company data before any external API call, web search, or tool invocation that sends data outside the local environment.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## When This Protocol Applies
|
||
|
||
**Trigger:** Any time company context or conversation content will leave the local session.
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
- Web search that includes company specifics
|
||
- External API call with company data in the payload
|
||
- Any tool call where conversation content is part of the request
|
||
|
||
**Does NOT apply to:**
|
||
- Local file reads/writes (`~/.claude/company-context.md`)
|
||
- In-session reasoning and analysis
|
||
- Generating advice or documents that stay local
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 1: Financial Figures → Relative Ranges
|
||
|
||
Never send specific financial data externally.
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "$2.4M ARR" | "early-stage ARR (sub-$5M)" |
|
||
| "$180K MRR" | "growing MRR, Series A range" |
|
||
| "14 months runway" | "runway is healthy for stage" |
|
||
| "burn rate is $320K/month" | "burn rate is moderate for stage" |
|
||
| "raised $8M Series A" | "Series A company" |
|
||
| "customer LTV is $4,200" | "LTV is above industry average for segment" |
|
||
| "CAC is $680" | "CAC is in a sustainable range" |
|
||
|
||
**Rule:** No dollar amounts. No month counts for runway. Use stage-relative descriptors.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 2: Customer Names → Anonymized Labels
|
||
|
||
Never send customer or client names externally.
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "Acme Corp is our biggest customer" | "Customer A (largest account)" |
|
||
| "we're working with NHS England" | "a large public-sector customer" |
|
||
| "BMW, Volkswagen, and Stellantis" | "three major automotive OEMs" |
|
||
| "10 enterprise customers including..." | "10 enterprise customers" |
|
||
|
||
**Rule:** Use "Customer A/B/C" for named accounts, or describe by segment without naming.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 3: Revenue Figures → Percentage Changes or Stage Descriptors
|
||
|
||
Revenue trajectory is safer than absolute numbers.
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "growing from $1M to $2M ARR" | "2x revenue growth year-over-year" |
|
||
| "revenue dropped from $500K to $430K" | "revenue declined ~15% in the period" |
|
||
| "hit $10M ARR last quarter" | "crossed a significant ARR milestone" |
|
||
| "doing $50K MRR" | "pre-Series A revenue, strong growth trajectory" |
|
||
|
||
**Rule:** Percentages and directional signals (growing / declining / flat) are safe. Absolutes are not.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 4: Employee Names → Roles Only
|
||
|
||
Never send individual names externally.
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "Our CTO, Sarah Chen, is struggling" | "our CTO is struggling with the transition" |
|
||
| "James is the best performer on the team" | "our strongest performer is in the engineering lead role" |
|
||
| "we're about to let go of Michael" | "we're about to make a leadership change" |
|
||
| "the founding team is me, Alex, and Priya" | "a three-person founding team" |
|
||
|
||
**Exception:** Publicly known executives (CEO of a public company, named in press releases) can be referenced by name. If in doubt, use role.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 5: Investor Names → Generic Descriptors
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "Sequoia led our round" | "a top-tier VC led our round" |
|
||
| "our lead investor is pushing for an exit" | "pressure from investors toward exit" |
|
||
| "Y Combinator alumni" | "accelerator alumni" |
|
||
|
||
**Exception:** YC, Techstars, and similar well-known accelerators are commonly referenced and safe if the founder has publicly disclosed. When in doubt, omit.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Rule 6: Location → Country or Region
|
||
|
||
| Raw data | Anonymized version |
|
||
|----------|-------------------|
|
||
| "Berlin-based startup" | "European startup" |
|
||
| "we're in San Francisco" | "US-based startup" |
|
||
| "expanding to Munich and Vienna" | "expanding in the DACH region" |
|
||
|
||
**Exception:** Location is less sensitive than financials. Use judgment — if it's on their website, it's fine.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Anonymization Decision Tree
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Before sending data externally:
|
||
|
||
1. Does it include a specific dollar amount?
|
||
→ YES: Replace with range or relative descriptor
|
||
|
||
2. Does it include a person's name?
|
||
→ YES: Replace with role only (unless publicly known)
|
||
|
||
3. Does it include a company or customer name?
|
||
→ YES: Replace with "Customer A" or segment descriptor
|
||
|
||
4. Does it include specific headcount or runway months?
|
||
→ YES: Replace with range (1–10, 10–50) or "healthy/tight/critical"
|
||
|
||
5. Does it include proprietary data, roadmap, or unreleased product info?
|
||
→ YES: Do not include. Reference only generically ("product expansion planned")
|
||
|
||
6. Is it publicly available information?
|
||
→ YES: Safe to send as-is
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Required vs Optional Anonymization
|
||
|
||
### Required (always strip before external calls)
|
||
- Revenue figures (absolute)
|
||
- Burn rate (absolute)
|
||
- Runway (specific months)
|
||
- Customer names
|
||
- Employee names
|
||
- Investor names (unless public)
|
||
- Funding amounts (unless public)
|
||
|
||
### Optional (use judgment based on sensitivity)
|
||
- Industry vertical (usually fine)
|
||
- Company stage (usually fine)
|
||
- Team size ranges (usually fine)
|
||
- Geographic region (usually fine)
|
||
- General challenge category (usually fine)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## What to Do If You're Unsure
|
||
|
||
Default to stricter anonymization. The cost of over-anonymizing is slightly less useful external results. The cost of under-anonymizing is a privacy breach.
|
||
|
||
When in doubt: **remove it**.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Audit Log (Internal Only)
|
||
|
||
When running external calls with company context, note internally:
|
||
```
|
||
[EXTERNAL CALL: {tool/API used}]
|
||
[ANONYMIZED: {fields stripped}]
|
||
[RETAINED: {fields kept and why}]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
This is for internal reasoning only — never included in output to the founder.
|