Files
claude-skills-reference/c-level-advisor/strategic-alignment/scripts/alignment_checker.py
Alireza Rezvani 466aa13a7b feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles (2→10) (#264)
* feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles

Add COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO advisors and Executive Mentor.
Expands C-level advisory from 2 to 10 roles with 74 total files.

Each role includes:
- SKILL.md (lean, <5KB, ~1200 tokens for context efficiency)
- Reference docs (loaded on demand, not at startup)
- Python analysis scripts (stdlib only, runnable CLI)

Executive Mentor features /em: slash commands (challenge, board-prep,
hard-call, stress-test, postmortem) with devil's advocate agent.

21 Python tools, 24 reference frameworks, 28,379 total lines.
All SKILL.md files combined: ~17K tokens (8.5% of 200K context window).

Badge: 88 → 116 skills

* feat: C-Suite orchestration layer + 18 complementary skills

ORCHESTRATION (new):
- cs-onboard: Founder interview → company-context.md
- chief-of-staff: Routing, synthesis, inter-agent orchestration
- board-meeting: 6-phase multi-agent deliberation protocol
- decision-logger: Two-layer memory (raw transcripts + approved decisions)
- agent-protocol: Inter-agent invocation with loop prevention
- context-engine: Company context loading + anonymization

CROSS-CUTTING CAPABILITIES (new):
- board-deck-builder: Board/investor update assembly
- scenario-war-room: Cascading multi-variable what-if modeling
- competitive-intel: Systematic competitor tracking + battlecards
- org-health-diagnostic: Cross-functional health scoring (8 dimensions)
- ma-playbook: M&A strategy (acquiring + being acquired)
- intl-expansion: International market entry frameworks

CULTURE & COLLABORATION (new):
- culture-architect: Values → behaviors, culture code, health assessment
- company-os: EOS/Scaling Up operating system selection + implementation
- founder-coach: Founder development, delegation, blind spots
- strategic-alignment: Strategy cascade, silo detection, alignment scoring
- change-management: ADKAR-based change rollout framework
- internal-narrative: One story across employees/investors/customers

UPGRADES TO EXISTING ROLES:
- All 10 roles get reasoning technique directives
- All 10 roles get company-context.md integration
- All 10 roles get board meeting isolation rules
- CEO gets stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed→C)

Key design decisions:
- Two-layer memory prevents hallucinated consensus from rejected ideas
- Phase 2 isolation: agents think independently before cross-examination
- Executive Mentor (The Critic) sees all perspectives, others don't
- 25 Python tools total (stdlib only, no dependencies)

52 new files, 10 modified, 10,862 new lines.
Total C-suite ecosystem: 134 files, 39,131 lines.

* fix: connect all dots — Chief of Staff routes to all 28 skills

- Added complementary skills registry to routing-matrix.md
- Chief of Staff SKILL.md now lists all 28 skills in ecosystem
- Added integration tables to scenario-war-room and competitive-intel
- Badge: 116 → 134 skills
- README: C-Level Advisory count 10 → 28

Quality audit passed:
 All 10 roles: company-context, reasoning, isolation, invocation
 All 6 phases in board meeting
 Two-layer memory with DO_NOT_RESURFACE
 Loop prevention (no self-invoke, max depth 2, no circular)
 All /em: commands present
 All complementary skills cross-reference roles
 Chief of Staff routes to every skill in ecosystem

* refactor: CEO + CTO advisors upgraded to C-suite parity

Both roles now match the structural standard of all new roles:
- CEO: 11.7KB → 6.8KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)
- CTO: 10KB → 7.2KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references)

Added to both:
- Integration table (who they work with and when)
- Key diagnostic questions
- Structured metrics dashboard table
- Consistent section ordering (Keywords → Quick Start → Responsibilities → Questions → Metrics → Red Flags → Integration → Reasoning → Context)

CEO additions:
- Stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed=3m/6m/12m → B+=1y/3y/5y)
- Cross-references to culture-architect and board-deck-builder

CTO additions:
- Key Questions section (7 diagnostic questions)
- Structured metrics table (DORA + debt + team + architecture + cost)
- Cross-references to all peer roles

All 10 roles now pass structural parity:  Keywords  QuickStart  Questions  Metrics  RedFlags  Integration

* feat: add proactive triggers + output artifacts to all 10 roles

Every C-suite role now specifies:
- Proactive Triggers: 'surface these without being asked' — context-driven
  early warnings that make advisors proactive, not reactive
- Output Artifacts: concrete deliverables per request type (what you ask →
  what you get)

CEO: runway alerts, board prep triggers, strategy review nudges
CTO: deploy frequency monitoring, tech debt thresholds, bus factor flags
COO: blocker detection, scaling threshold warnings, cadence gaps
CPO: retention curve monitoring, portfolio dog detection, research gaps
CMO: CAC trend monitoring, positioning gaps, budget staleness
CFO: runway forecasting, burn multiple alerts, scenario planning gaps
CRO: NRR monitoring, pipeline coverage, pricing review triggers
CISO: audit overdue alerts, compliance gaps, vendor risk
CHRO: retention risk, comp band gaps, org scaling thresholds
Executive Mentor: board prep triggers, groupthink detection, hard call surfacing

This transforms the C-suite from reactive advisors into proactive partners.

* feat: User Communication Standard — structured output for all roles

Defines 3 output formats in agent-protocol/SKILL.md:

1. Standard Output: Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Risks → Your Decision
2. Proactive Alert: What I Noticed → Why It Matters → Action → Urgency (🔴🟡)
3. Board Meeting: Decision Required → Perspectives → Agree/Disagree → Critic → Action Items

10 non-negotiable rules:
- Bottom line first, always
- Results and decisions only (no process narration)
- What + Why + How for every finding
- Actions have owners and deadlines ('we should consider' is banned)
- Decisions framed as options with trade-offs
- Founder is the highest authority — roles recommend, founder decides
- Risks are concrete (if X → Y, costs $Z)
- Max 5 bullets per section
- No jargon without explanation
- Silence over fabricated updates

All 10 roles reference this standard.
Chief of Staff enforces it as a quality gate.
Board meeting Phase 4 uses the Board Meeting Output format.

* feat: Internal Quality Loop — verification before delivery

No role presents to the founder without passing verification:

Step 1: Self-Verification (every role, every time)
  - Source attribution: where did each data point come from?
  - Assumption audit: [VERIFIED] vs [ASSUMED] tags on every finding
  - Confidence scoring: 🟢 high / 🟡 medium / 🔴 low per finding
  - Contradiction check against company-context + decision log
  - 'So what?' test: every finding needs a business consequence

Step 2: Peer Verification (cross-functional)
  - Financial claims → CFO validates math
  - Revenue projections → CRO validates pipeline backing
  - Technical feasibility → CTO validates
  - People/hiring impact → CHRO validates
  - Skip for single-domain, low-stakes questions

Step 3: Critic Pre-Screen (high-stakes only)
  - Irreversible decisions, >20% runway impact, strategy changes
  - Executive Mentor finds weakest point before founder sees it
  - Suspicious consensus triggers mandatory pre-screen

Step 4: Course Correction (after founder feedback)
  - Approve → log + assign actions
  - Modify → re-verify changed parts
  - Reject → DO_NOT_RESURFACE + learn why
  - 30/60/90 day post-decision review

Board meeting contributions now require self-verified format with
confidence tags and source attribution on every finding.

* fix: resolve PR review issues 1, 4, and minor observation

Issue 1: c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md — completely rewritten
  - Was: 2 skills (CEO, CTO only), dated Nov 2025
  - Now: full 28-skill ecosystem map with architecture diagram,
    all roles/orchestration/cross-cutting/culture skills listed,
    design decisions, integration with other domains

Issue 4: Root CLAUDE.md — updated all stale counts
  - 87 → 134 skills across all 3 references
  - C-Level: 2 → 33 (10 roles + 5 mentor commands + 18 complementary)
  - Tool count: 160+ → 185+
  - Reference count: 200+ → 250+

Minor observation: Documented plugin.json convention
  - Explained in c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md that only executive-mentor
    has plugin.json because only it has slash commands (/em: namespace)
  - Other skills are invoked by name through Chief of Staff or directly

Also fixed: README.md 88+ → 134 in two places (first line + skills section)

* fix: update all plugin/index registrations for 28-skill C-suite

1. c-level-advisor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — v2.0.0
   - Was: 2 skills, generic description
   - Now: all 28 skills listed with descriptions, all 25 scripts,
     namespace 'cs', full ecosystem description

2. .codex/skills-index.json — added 18 complementary skills
   - Was: 10 roles only
   - Now: 28 total c-level entries (10 roles + 6 orchestration +
     6 cross-cutting + 6 culture)
   - Each with full description for skill discovery

3. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — updated c-level-skills entry
   - Was: generic 2-skill description
   - Now: v2.0.0, full 28-skill ecosystem description,
     skills_count: 28, scripts_count: 25

* feat: add root SKILL.md for c-level-advisor ClawHub package

---------

Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai>
2026-03-06 01:35:08 +01:00

456 lines
17 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Strategic Alignment Checker
Detects misalignment in OKR structures:
- Orphan OKRs: team goals with no connection to company goals
- Conflicting OKRs: team goals that may work against each other
- Coverage gaps: company goals with insufficient team support
Input: JSON file with company and team OKRs
Output: Alignment score, gap report, conflict map
Usage:
python alignment_checker.py # Run with sample data
python alignment_checker.py --file my_okrs.json # Run with your data
python alignment_checker.py --sample # Print sample JSON format
"""
import json
import sys
import argparse
from collections import defaultdict
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Sample data
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
SAMPLE_DATA = {
"quarter": "Q2 2026",
"company": {
"name": "Acme Corp",
"okrs": [
{
"id": "C1",
"objective": "Win mid-market DACH healthcare segment",
"key_results": [
"Reach 50 paying customers in DACH by EoQ",
"Achieve €800K ARR in DACH",
"Net Revenue Retention > 110%"
]
},
{
"id": "C2",
"objective": "Ship the platform API to unlock partner integrations",
"key_results": [
"API v1 launched with 3 partner integrations",
"API documentation coverage: 100% of endpoints",
"< 200ms P95 response time under load"
]
},
{
"id": "C3",
"objective": "Build a capital-efficient growth engine",
"key_results": [
"CAC payback period < 12 months",
"Burn multiple < 1.5x",
"Revenue per employee up 20% vs Q1"
]
}
]
},
"teams": [
{
"name": "Sales",
"okrs": [
{
"id": "S1",
"objective": "Hit DACH new business targets",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C1",
"key_results": [
"Close 15 new DACH logos",
"Pipeline coverage: 3x of target",
"Average deal size > €18K ARR"
],
"potential_conflicts": ["C3", "CS2"]
},
{
"id": "S2",
"objective": "Expand into Austria market",
"parent_company_okr_id": None, # ORPHAN — no company OKR parent
"key_results": [
"5 qualified meetings with Austrian prospects",
"1 pilot signed in Austria"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
}
]
},
{
"name": "Engineering",
"okrs": [
{
"id": "E1",
"objective": "Deliver API v1 on schedule",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C2",
"key_results": [
"API v1 feature complete by Week 8",
"Zero critical bugs at launch",
"P95 latency < 200ms under 500 RPS"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
},
{
"id": "E2",
"objective": "Reduce infrastructure cost by 30%",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C3",
"key_results": [
"Migrate 3 services to spot instances",
"Decommission legacy DB cluster",
"Monthly infra cost < €12K"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
},
{
"id": "E3",
"objective": "Achieve zero-downtime deployments",
"parent_company_okr_id": None, # ORPHAN
"key_results": [
"Implement blue-green deployment pipeline",
"Deployment success rate > 99.5%"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
}
]
},
{
"name": "Customer Success",
"okrs": [
{
"id": "CS1",
"objective": "Drive retention and expansion in DACH",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C1",
"key_results": [
"NRR > 110% for DACH cohort",
"Churn < 2% gross monthly",
"CSAT score > 4.5/5"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
},
{
"id": "CS2",
"objective": "Reduce support ticket volume by 40%",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C3",
"key_results": [
"Launch self-serve knowledge base",
"Ticket deflection rate > 35%",
"Time-to-first-response < 2 hours"
],
"potential_conflicts": ["S1"] # Volume close pressure → more bad-fit customers → more tickets
}
]
},
{
"name": "Marketing",
"okrs": [
{
"id": "M1",
"objective": "Generate DACH pipeline to support sales targets",
"parent_company_okr_id": "C1",
"key_results": [
"€2.4M qualified pipeline from DACH",
"30 qualified demo requests from target ICP",
"CAC from inbound < €4K"
],
"potential_conflicts": []
}
]
}
],
"known_conflicts": [
{
"team_a": "Sales",
"okr_a": "S1",
"team_b": "Customer Success",
"okr_b": "CS2",
"description": "Sales closing volume deals to hit number may include poor-fit customers, increasing CS ticket load and reducing CSAT — directly conflicting with CS ticket reduction target."
}
]
}
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Analysis functions
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def get_all_company_okr_ids(data):
return {okr["id"] for okr in data["company"]["okrs"]}
def detect_orphans(data, company_ids):
"""Find team OKRs with no parent company OKR."""
orphans = []
for team in data["teams"]:
for okr in team["okrs"]:
if okr.get("parent_company_okr_id") is None:
orphans.append({
"team": team["name"],
"okr_id": okr["id"],
"objective": okr["objective"]
})
elif okr["parent_company_okr_id"] not in company_ids:
orphans.append({
"team": team["name"],
"okr_id": okr["id"],
"objective": okr["objective"],
"note": f"References non-existent company OKR: {okr['parent_company_okr_id']}"
})
return orphans
def detect_coverage_gaps(data, company_ids):
"""Find company OKRs with no team support."""
coverage = defaultdict(list)
for team in data["teams"]:
for okr in team["okrs"]:
parent = okr.get("parent_company_okr_id")
if parent and parent in company_ids:
coverage[parent].append({
"team": team["name"],
"okr_id": okr["id"],
"objective": okr["objective"]
})
gaps = []
over_indexed = []
for company_okr in data["company"]["okrs"]:
cid = company_okr["id"]
supporting = coverage.get(cid, [])
entry = {
"company_okr_id": cid,
"objective": company_okr["objective"],
"supporting_team_count": len(supporting),
"supporting_teams": [s["team"] for s in supporting]
}
if len(supporting) == 0:
gaps.append(entry)
elif len(supporting) >= 4:
over_indexed.append(entry)
return gaps, over_indexed, coverage
def detect_conflicts(data):
"""Surface declared and potential OKR conflicts."""
conflicts = []
# Use declared known_conflicts
for conflict in data.get("known_conflicts", []):
conflicts.append({
"type": "declared",
"team_a": conflict["team_a"],
"okr_a": conflict["okr_a"],
"team_b": conflict["team_b"],
"okr_b": conflict["okr_b"],
"description": conflict["description"]
})
# Use potential_conflicts fields on OKRs for cross-reference
okr_index = {}
for team in data["teams"]:
for okr in team["okrs"]:
okr_index[okr["id"]] = {"team": team["name"], "objective": okr["objective"]}
for team in data["teams"]:
for okr in team["okrs"]:
for conflict_id in okr.get("potential_conflicts", []):
if conflict_id in okr_index:
target = okr_index[conflict_id]
# Avoid duplicate (A→B and B→A)
already_declared = any(
(c["okr_a"] == okr["id"] and c["okr_b"] == conflict_id) or
(c["okr_a"] == conflict_id and c["okr_b"] == okr["id"])
for c in conflicts
)
if not already_declared:
conflicts.append({
"type": "potential",
"team_a": team["name"],
"okr_a": okr["id"],
"team_b": target["team"],
"okr_b": conflict_id,
"description": f"Potential conflict between '{okr['objective']}' and '{target['objective']}' — review recommended"
})
return conflicts
def compute_alignment_score(data, orphans, gaps, conflicts, coverage):
"""Score overall alignment from 0100."""
total_team_okrs = sum(len(t["okrs"]) for t in data["teams"])
total_company_okrs = len(data["company"]["okrs"])
orphan_penalty = (len(orphans) / max(total_team_okrs, 1)) * 30
gap_penalty = (len(gaps) / max(total_company_okrs, 1)) * 30
conflict_penalty = min(len(conflicts) * 10, 30)
score = max(0, 100 - orphan_penalty - gap_penalty - conflict_penalty)
return round(score)
def score_label(score):
if score >= 85:
return "✅ Excellent"
elif score >= 70:
return "🟡 Moderate misalignment"
elif score >= 50:
return "🟠 Significant misalignment"
else:
return "🔴 Critical misalignment"
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Report generation
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def print_report(data, orphans, gaps, over_indexed, conflicts, coverage, score):
sep = "" * 60
print(f"\n{'' * 60}")
print(f" STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT REPORT — {data.get('quarter', 'Unknown Quarter')}")
print(f" Company: {data['company']['name']}")
print(f"{'' * 60}\n")
print(f" ALIGNMENT SCORE: {score}/100 {score_label(score)}\n")
print(sep)
# Company OKRs summary
print("\n📋 COMPANY OKRs\n")
for okr in data["company"]["okrs"]:
supporting = coverage.get(okr["id"], [])
teams_str = ", ".join(s["team"] for s in supporting) if supporting else "⚠️ NONE"
print(f" [{okr['id']}] {okr['objective']}")
print(f" Supported by: {teams_str}")
print()
print(sep)
# Orphan OKRs
print(f"\n🔍 ORPHAN OKRs ({len(orphans)} found)\n")
if orphans:
for o in orphans:
note = f"{o.get('note', 'No parent company OKR assigned')}"
print(f" ⚠️ [{o['okr_id']}] {o['team']}: {o['objective']}")
print(f" Issue: {note}")
print()
print(" → Action: Connect each orphan to a company OKR, or deprioritize it.")
else:
print(" ✅ None found. All team OKRs connect to company OKRs.")
print()
print(sep)
# Coverage gaps
print(f"\n🕳️ COVERAGE GAPS ({len(gaps)} company OKRs with zero team support)\n")
if gaps:
for g in gaps:
print(f" 🔴 [{g['company_okr_id']}] {g['objective']}")
print(f" No team is working on this. It will not be achieved.")
print()
print(" → Action: Assign at least one team owner to each unowned company OKR.")
else:
print(" ✅ All company OKRs have at least one team supporting them.")
print()
if over_indexed:
print(f" 📊 OVER-INDEXED OKRs ({len(over_indexed)} company OKRs with 4+ teams)\n")
for o in over_indexed:
print(f" [{o['company_okr_id']}] {o['objective']}")
print(f" {o['supporting_team_count']} teams: {', '.join(o['supporting_teams'])}")
print()
print(" → Note: High coverage isn't necessarily bad, but check if under-covered OKRs are being neglected.")
print(sep)
# Conflicts
print(f"\n⚡ CONFLICTING OKRs ({len(conflicts)} found)\n")
if conflicts:
for i, c in enumerate(conflicts, 1):
label = "🔴 Declared" if c["type"] == "declared" else "🟡 Potential"
print(f" {label} Conflict #{i}")
print(f" {c['team_a']} [{c['okr_a']}] ↔ {c['team_b']} [{c['okr_b']}]")
print(f" {c['description']}")
print()
print(" → Action: For each conflict, design a shared metric or shared constraint that prevents local optimization at company expense.")
else:
print(" ✅ No declared or potential conflicts detected.")
print()
print(sep)
# Summary
print("\n📊 SUMMARY\n")
total_team_okrs = sum(len(t["okrs"]) for t in data["teams"])
total_company_okrs = len(data["company"]["okrs"])
print(f" Company OKRs: {total_company_okrs}")
print(f" Team OKRs: {total_team_okrs}")
print(f" Orphan OKRs: {len(orphans)}")
print(f" Coverage gaps: {len(gaps)} of {total_company_okrs} company OKRs have no team support")
print(f" Conflicts: {len(conflicts)}")
print(f" Alignment score: {score}/100 {score_label(score)}")
print()
if score < 70:
print(" ⚠️ RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:")
if orphans:
print(f" 1. Resolve {len(orphans)} orphan OKR(s) — connect to company goals or cut")
if gaps:
print(f" 2. Assign team owners to {len(gaps)} uncovered company OKR(s)")
if conflicts:
print(f" 3. Address {len(conflicts)} conflict(s) with shared metrics or constraints")
print(" 4. Run a cross-functional OKR review before next quarter begins")
print()
print(f"{'' * 60}\n")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
# Main
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Strategic OKR Alignment Checker")
parser.add_argument("--file", help="Path to JSON file with OKR data")
parser.add_argument("--sample", action="store_true", help="Print sample JSON format and exit")
args = parser.parse_args()
if args.sample:
print(json.dumps(SAMPLE_DATA, indent=2))
return
if args.file:
try:
with open(args.file, "r") as f:
data = json.load(f)
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"Error: File '{args.file}' not found.")
sys.exit(1)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
print(f"Error: Invalid JSON in '{args.file}': {e}")
sys.exit(1)
else:
print("No file provided. Running with sample data.\n")
print("To use your own data: python alignment_checker.py --file your_okrs.json")
print("To see the expected JSON format: python alignment_checker.py --sample\n")
data = SAMPLE_DATA
# Run analysis
company_ids = get_all_company_okr_ids(data)
orphans = detect_orphans(data, company_ids)
gaps, over_indexed, coverage = detect_coverage_gaps(data, company_ids)
conflicts = detect_conflicts(data)
score = compute_alignment_score(data, orphans, gaps, conflicts, coverage)
# Print report
print_report(data, orphans, gaps, over_indexed, conflicts, coverage, score)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()