Files
claude-skills-reference/docs/skills/engineering-team/playwright-pro-coverage.md
Reza Rezvani 2c72babd52 feat: add MkDocs Material docs site with 170 auto-generated skill pages
- mkdocs.yml: Material theme with dark/light mode, search, tabs, sitemap
- scripts/generate-docs.py: auto-generates docs from all SKILL.md files
- docs/index.md: landing page with domain overview and quick install
- docs/getting-started.md: installation guide for Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw
- docs/skills/: 170 skill pages + 9 domain index pages
- .github/workflows/static.yml: MkDocs build + GitHub Pages deploy
- .gitignore: exclude site/ build output

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-06 12:16:26 +01:00

103 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown

---
title: "Analyze Test Coverage Gaps"
description: "Analyze Test Coverage Gaps - Claude Code skill from the Engineering - Core domain."
---
# Analyze Test Coverage Gaps
**Domain:** Engineering - Core | **Skill:** `coverage` | **Source:** [`engineering-team/playwright-pro/skills/coverage/SKILL.md`](https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering-team/playwright-pro/skills/coverage/SKILL.md)
---
# Analyze Test Coverage Gaps
Map all testable surfaces in the application and identify what's tested vs. what's missing.
## Steps
### 1. Map Application Surface
Use the `Explore` subagent to catalog:
**Routes/Pages:**
- Scan route definitions (Next.js `app/`, React Router config, Vue Router, etc.)
- List all user-facing pages with their paths
**Components:**
- Identify interactive components (forms, modals, dropdowns, tables)
- Note components with complex state logic
**API Endpoints:**
- Scan API route files or backend controllers
- List all endpoints with their methods
**User Flows:**
- Identify critical paths: auth, checkout, onboarding, core features
- Map multi-step workflows
### 2. Map Existing Tests
Scan all `*.spec.ts` / `*.spec.js` files:
- Extract which pages/routes are covered (by `page.goto()` calls)
- Extract which components are tested (by locator usage)
- Extract which API endpoints are mocked or hit
- Count tests per area
### 3. Generate Coverage Matrix
```
## Coverage Matrix
| Area | Route | Tests | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auth | /login | 5 | ✅ Covered |
| Auth | /register | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Auth | /forgot-password | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Dashboard | /dashboard | 3 | ⚠️ Partial (no error states) |
| Settings | /settings | 0 | ❌ Missing |
| Checkout | /checkout | 8 | ✅ Covered |
```
### 4. Prioritize Gaps
Rank uncovered areas by business impact:
1. **Critical** — auth, payment, core features → test first
2. **High** — user-facing CRUD, search, navigation
3. **Medium** — settings, preferences, edge cases
4. **Low** — static pages, about, terms
### 5. Suggest Test Plan
For each gap, recommend:
- Number of tests needed
- Which template from `templates/` to use
- Estimated effort (quick/medium/complex)
```
## Recommended Test Plan
### Priority 1: Critical
1. /register (4 tests) — use auth/registration template — quick
2. /forgot-password (3 tests) — use auth/password-reset template — quick
### Priority 2: High
3. /settings (4 tests) — use settings/ templates — medium
4. Dashboard error states (2 tests) — use dashboard/data-loading template — quick
```
### 6. Auto-Generate (Optional)
Ask user: "Generate tests for the top N gaps? [Yes/No/Pick specific]"
If yes, invoke `/pw:generate` for each gap with the recommended template.
## Output
- Coverage matrix (table format)
- Coverage percentage estimate
- Prioritized gap list with effort estimates
- Option to auto-generate missing tests