2f57ef8948
- AgentHub: 13 files updated with non-engineering examples (content drafts, research, strategy) — engineering stays primary, cross-domain secondary - AgentHub: 7 slash commands, 5 Python scripts, 3 references, 1 agent, dry_run.py validation (57 checks) - Marketplace: agenthub entry added with cross-domain keywords, engineering POWERFUL updated (25→30), product (12→13), counts synced across all configs - SEO: generate-docs.py now produces keyword-rich <title> tags and meta descriptions using SKILL.md frontmatter — "Claude Code Skills" in site_name propagates to all 276 HTML pages - SEO: per-domain title suffixes (Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw, etc.), slug-as-title cleanup, domain label stripping from titles - Broken links: 141→0 warnings — new rewrite_skill_internal_links() converts references/, scripts/, assets/ links to GitHub source URLs; skills/index.md phantom slugs fixed (6 marketing, 7 RA/QM) - Counts synced: 204 skills, 266 tools, 382 refs, 16 agents, 17 commands, 21 plugins — consistent across CLAUDE.md, README.md, docs/index.md, marketplace.json, getting-started.md, mkdocs.yml - Platform sync: Codex 163 skills, Gemini 246 items, OpenClaw compatible Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
71 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Interview System Designer — Agent Skill for Codex & OpenClaw"
|
|
description: "This skill should be used when the user asks to 'design interview processes', 'create hiring pipelines', 'calibrate interview loops', 'generate. Agent skill for Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, OpenClaw."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Interview System Designer
|
|
|
|
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-rocket-launch: Engineering - POWERFUL</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `interview-system-designer`</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/engineering/interview-system-designer/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
|
|
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install engineering-advanced-skills</code>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive interview loop planning and calibration support for role-based hiring systems.
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Use this skill to create structured interview loops, standardize question quality, and keep hiring signal consistent across interviewers.
|
|
|
|
## Core Capabilities
|
|
|
|
- Interview loop planning by role and level
|
|
- Round-by-round focus and timing recommendations
|
|
- Suggested question sets by round type
|
|
- Framework support for scoring and calibration
|
|
- Bias-reduction and process consistency guidance
|
|
|
|
## Quick Start
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Generate a loop plan for a role and level
|
|
python3 scripts/interview_planner.py --role "Senior Software Engineer" --level senior
|
|
|
|
# JSON output for integration with internal tooling
|
|
python3 scripts/interview_planner.py --role "Product Manager" --level mid --json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Recommended Workflow
|
|
|
|
1. Run `scripts/interview_planner.py` to generate a baseline loop.
|
|
2. Align rounds to role-specific competencies.
|
|
3. Validate scoring rubric consistency with interview panel leads.
|
|
4. Review for bias controls before rollout.
|
|
5. Recalibrate quarterly using hiring outcome data.
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
- `references/interview-frameworks.md`
|
|
- `references/bias_mitigation_checklist.md`
|
|
- `references/competency_matrix_templates.md`
|
|
- `references/debrief_facilitation_guide.md`
|
|
|
|
## Common Pitfalls
|
|
|
|
- Overweighting one round while ignoring other competency signals
|
|
- Using unstructured interviews without standardized scoring
|
|
- Skipping calibration sessions for interviewers
|
|
- Changing hiring bar without documenting rationale
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
1. Keep round objectives explicit and non-overlapping.
|
|
2. Require evidence for each score recommendation.
|
|
3. Use the same baseline rubric across comparable roles.
|
|
4. Revisit loop design based on quality-of-hire outcomes.
|