* feat: C-Suite expansion — 8 new executive advisory roles Add COO, CPO, CMO, CFO, CRO, CISO, CHRO advisors and Executive Mentor. Expands C-level advisory from 2 to 10 roles with 74 total files. Each role includes: - SKILL.md (lean, <5KB, ~1200 tokens for context efficiency) - Reference docs (loaded on demand, not at startup) - Python analysis scripts (stdlib only, runnable CLI) Executive Mentor features /em: slash commands (challenge, board-prep, hard-call, stress-test, postmortem) with devil's advocate agent. 21 Python tools, 24 reference frameworks, 28,379 total lines. All SKILL.md files combined: ~17K tokens (8.5% of 200K context window). Badge: 88 → 116 skills * feat: C-Suite orchestration layer + 18 complementary skills ORCHESTRATION (new): - cs-onboard: Founder interview → company-context.md - chief-of-staff: Routing, synthesis, inter-agent orchestration - board-meeting: 6-phase multi-agent deliberation protocol - decision-logger: Two-layer memory (raw transcripts + approved decisions) - agent-protocol: Inter-agent invocation with loop prevention - context-engine: Company context loading + anonymization CROSS-CUTTING CAPABILITIES (new): - board-deck-builder: Board/investor update assembly - scenario-war-room: Cascading multi-variable what-if modeling - competitive-intel: Systematic competitor tracking + battlecards - org-health-diagnostic: Cross-functional health scoring (8 dimensions) - ma-playbook: M&A strategy (acquiring + being acquired) - intl-expansion: International market entry frameworks CULTURE & COLLABORATION (new): - culture-architect: Values → behaviors, culture code, health assessment - company-os: EOS/Scaling Up operating system selection + implementation - founder-coach: Founder development, delegation, blind spots - strategic-alignment: Strategy cascade, silo detection, alignment scoring - change-management: ADKAR-based change rollout framework - internal-narrative: One story across employees/investors/customers UPGRADES TO EXISTING ROLES: - All 10 roles get reasoning technique directives - All 10 roles get company-context.md integration - All 10 roles get board meeting isolation rules - CEO gets stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed→C) Key design decisions: - Two-layer memory prevents hallucinated consensus from rejected ideas - Phase 2 isolation: agents think independently before cross-examination - Executive Mentor (The Critic) sees all perspectives, others don't - 25 Python tools total (stdlib only, no dependencies) 52 new files, 10 modified, 10,862 new lines. Total C-suite ecosystem: 134 files, 39,131 lines. * fix: connect all dots — Chief of Staff routes to all 28 skills - Added complementary skills registry to routing-matrix.md - Chief of Staff SKILL.md now lists all 28 skills in ecosystem - Added integration tables to scenario-war-room and competitive-intel - Badge: 116 → 134 skills - README: C-Level Advisory count 10 → 28 Quality audit passed: ✅ All 10 roles: company-context, reasoning, isolation, invocation ✅ All 6 phases in board meeting ✅ Two-layer memory with DO_NOT_RESURFACE ✅ Loop prevention (no self-invoke, max depth 2, no circular) ✅ All /em: commands present ✅ All complementary skills cross-reference roles ✅ Chief of Staff routes to every skill in ecosystem * refactor: CEO + CTO advisors upgraded to C-suite parity Both roles now match the structural standard of all new roles: - CEO: 11.7KB → 6.8KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references) - CTO: 10KB → 7.2KB SKILL.md (heavy content stays in references) Added to both: - Integration table (who they work with and when) - Key diagnostic questions - Structured metrics dashboard table - Consistent section ordering (Keywords → Quick Start → Responsibilities → Questions → Metrics → Red Flags → Integration → Reasoning → Context) CEO additions: - Stage-adaptive temporal horizons (seed=3m/6m/12m → B+=1y/3y/5y) - Cross-references to culture-architect and board-deck-builder CTO additions: - Key Questions section (7 diagnostic questions) - Structured metrics table (DORA + debt + team + architecture + cost) - Cross-references to all peer roles All 10 roles now pass structural parity: ✅ Keywords ✅ QuickStart ✅ Questions ✅ Metrics ✅ RedFlags ✅ Integration * feat: add proactive triggers + output artifacts to all 10 roles Every C-suite role now specifies: - Proactive Triggers: 'surface these without being asked' — context-driven early warnings that make advisors proactive, not reactive - Output Artifacts: concrete deliverables per request type (what you ask → what you get) CEO: runway alerts, board prep triggers, strategy review nudges CTO: deploy frequency monitoring, tech debt thresholds, bus factor flags COO: blocker detection, scaling threshold warnings, cadence gaps CPO: retention curve monitoring, portfolio dog detection, research gaps CMO: CAC trend monitoring, positioning gaps, budget staleness CFO: runway forecasting, burn multiple alerts, scenario planning gaps CRO: NRR monitoring, pipeline coverage, pricing review triggers CISO: audit overdue alerts, compliance gaps, vendor risk CHRO: retention risk, comp band gaps, org scaling thresholds Executive Mentor: board prep triggers, groupthink detection, hard call surfacing This transforms the C-suite from reactive advisors into proactive partners. * feat: User Communication Standard — structured output for all roles Defines 3 output formats in agent-protocol/SKILL.md: 1. Standard Output: Bottom Line → What → Why → How to Act → Risks → Your Decision 2. Proactive Alert: What I Noticed → Why It Matters → Action → Urgency (🔴🟡⚪) 3. Board Meeting: Decision Required → Perspectives → Agree/Disagree → Critic → Action Items 10 non-negotiable rules: - Bottom line first, always - Results and decisions only (no process narration) - What + Why + How for every finding - Actions have owners and deadlines ('we should consider' is banned) - Decisions framed as options with trade-offs - Founder is the highest authority — roles recommend, founder decides - Risks are concrete (if X → Y, costs $Z) - Max 5 bullets per section - No jargon without explanation - Silence over fabricated updates All 10 roles reference this standard. Chief of Staff enforces it as a quality gate. Board meeting Phase 4 uses the Board Meeting Output format. * feat: Internal Quality Loop — verification before delivery No role presents to the founder without passing verification: Step 1: Self-Verification (every role, every time) - Source attribution: where did each data point come from? - Assumption audit: [VERIFIED] vs [ASSUMED] tags on every finding - Confidence scoring: 🟢 high / 🟡 medium / 🔴 low per finding - Contradiction check against company-context + decision log - 'So what?' test: every finding needs a business consequence Step 2: Peer Verification (cross-functional) - Financial claims → CFO validates math - Revenue projections → CRO validates pipeline backing - Technical feasibility → CTO validates - People/hiring impact → CHRO validates - Skip for single-domain, low-stakes questions Step 3: Critic Pre-Screen (high-stakes only) - Irreversible decisions, >20% runway impact, strategy changes - Executive Mentor finds weakest point before founder sees it - Suspicious consensus triggers mandatory pre-screen Step 4: Course Correction (after founder feedback) - Approve → log + assign actions - Modify → re-verify changed parts - Reject → DO_NOT_RESURFACE + learn why - 30/60/90 day post-decision review Board meeting contributions now require self-verified format with confidence tags and source attribution on every finding. * fix: resolve PR review issues 1, 4, and minor observation Issue 1: c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md — completely rewritten - Was: 2 skills (CEO, CTO only), dated Nov 2025 - Now: full 28-skill ecosystem map with architecture diagram, all roles/orchestration/cross-cutting/culture skills listed, design decisions, integration with other domains Issue 4: Root CLAUDE.md — updated all stale counts - 87 → 134 skills across all 3 references - C-Level: 2 → 33 (10 roles + 5 mentor commands + 18 complementary) - Tool count: 160+ → 185+ - Reference count: 200+ → 250+ Minor observation: Documented plugin.json convention - Explained in c-level-advisor/CLAUDE.md that only executive-mentor has plugin.json because only it has slash commands (/em: namespace) - Other skills are invoked by name through Chief of Staff or directly Also fixed: README.md 88+ → 134 in two places (first line + skills section) * fix: update all plugin/index registrations for 28-skill C-suite 1. c-level-advisor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — v2.0.0 - Was: 2 skills, generic description - Now: all 28 skills listed with descriptions, all 25 scripts, namespace 'cs', full ecosystem description 2. .codex/skills-index.json — added 18 complementary skills - Was: 10 roles only - Now: 28 total c-level entries (10 roles + 6 orchestration + 6 cross-cutting + 6 culture) - Each with full description for skill discovery 3. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — updated c-level-skills entry - Was: generic 2-skill description - Now: v2.0.0, full 28-skill ecosystem description, skills_count: 28, scripts_count: 25 * feat: add root SKILL.md for c-level-advisor ClawHub package --------- Co-authored-by: Leo <leo@openclaw.ai>
264 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
264 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# Board Dynamics — Managing the People Who Can Fire You
|
||
|
||
Your board has the power to fire you. Most boards don't want to. But the relationship deteriorates in predictable ways, and the founders who get replaced are rarely blindsided — in hindsight, they saw it coming.
|
||
|
||
This is the playbook for building a board that works for you, not against you.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 1: Understanding Board Member Types
|
||
|
||
Not all directors are the same. Understanding who you're dealing with changes how you work with them.
|
||
|
||
### The Operator Board Member
|
||
|
||
Usually a former founder or executive. Has built companies, made payroll, managed crises. Values: pragmatism, execution, honesty about what's not working.
|
||
|
||
**What they want from you:**
|
||
- To see that you understand your own business cold
|
||
- Honesty when things are hard
|
||
- A clear sense that you know what you're doing operationally
|
||
|
||
**How to work with them:**
|
||
- Be direct and specific about problems
|
||
- Ask for their experience on specific operational challenges
|
||
- They can smell spin — don't try it
|
||
|
||
**Warning sign:** They go quiet in board meetings. Operators who disengage are usually losing confidence.
|
||
|
||
### The Financial Investor Director
|
||
|
||
VC or PE-backed. Focused on return. Watches: growth rate, burn, path to next round, exit prospects.
|
||
|
||
**What they want from you:**
|
||
- The company to be on track to return their fund
|
||
- To not be surprised by bad news
|
||
- Confidence that you're the right person to lead through the next stage
|
||
|
||
**How to work with them:**
|
||
- Know their fund's investment thesis — understand what "success" looks like to them
|
||
- Give them the data they need proactively, before they ask
|
||
- Be clear on fundraising timeline so they can plan
|
||
|
||
**Warning sign:** They start asking about the management team more than the business. This is a proxy for evaluating whether you need to be replaced.
|
||
|
||
### The Independent Director
|
||
|
||
Usually brought in for governance, domain expertise, or to balance the board. Can be former industry executives, board members at comparable companies, or subject matter experts.
|
||
|
||
**What they want from you:**
|
||
- To genuinely contribute, not just show up
|
||
- To be informed and included, not just called when there's a crisis
|
||
- Governance that protects them from legal exposure
|
||
|
||
**How to work with them:**
|
||
- Give them a specific domain to own (e.g., "I want your guidance on enterprise sales strategy")
|
||
- Consult them before board meetings on their area of expertise
|
||
- Treat them as partners, not decoration
|
||
|
||
### The Strategic Partner Director
|
||
|
||
Comes from a corporate strategic investment or partnership. Focused on how your success maps to their strategic interests.
|
||
|
||
**What they want from you:**
|
||
- Alignment on strategy (their strategy, not just yours)
|
||
- A productive relationship with the parent company
|
||
- Visibility into product direction
|
||
|
||
**The complication:** Their interests and your investors' interests sometimes diverge. Manage this proactively. Don't let the board divide into factions.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 2: Information Architecture
|
||
|
||
What you tell the board, when you tell them, and how shapes the relationship more than almost anything else.
|
||
|
||
### The Rule on Bad News
|
||
|
||
**Tell them before the meeting, not during it.**
|
||
|
||
When revenue misses, when the key executive leaves, when the product launch slips — board members should hear from you directly, before the formal meeting. A brief message: "I want to flag that Q3 came in below target. Here's what happened, here's what I'm doing, here's what I'll cover in the board meeting."
|
||
|
||
Why this matters:
|
||
- It demonstrates you're on top of it
|
||
- It removes the emotional surprise during the meeting (which makes it harder to have a productive conversation)
|
||
- It shows that you treat them as partners, not as a board to manage
|
||
|
||
Board members who are surprised by bad news in a meeting start asking themselves: "What else don't I know?"
|
||
|
||
### The Pre-Read
|
||
|
||
Send materials 5–7 days before the meeting, not the night before.
|
||
|
||
Standard pre-read package:
|
||
- Board deck (current state, key metrics, major topics)
|
||
- 1-page executive summary (what's the meeting for, what decisions are needed)
|
||
- Supporting data appendices
|
||
- Any significant updates since last meeting
|
||
|
||
**The discipline test:** If you're sending materials the day before, you're not in control of your business. The data should be available earlier. If it isn't, that's a systems problem worth fixing.
|
||
|
||
### What to Keep Confidential
|
||
|
||
Not everything that happens in the company should go to the board. Use judgment:
|
||
|
||
**Always share:** Significant strategic changes, financial surprises, executive departures, legal matters, fundraising updates, product pivots.
|
||
|
||
**Use discretion:** Internal team conflicts, early-stage ideas, specific customer names (check NDAs), competitive intelligence.
|
||
|
||
**Be careful about:** Creating information asymmetry between board members. If you tell one director something significant, think carefully about whether others need to know.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 3: Running Effective Board Meetings
|
||
|
||
### The Structure That Works
|
||
|
||
**(15 min) CEO Update**
|
||
Current state of business in 5 minutes. What changed since last meeting. The one or two things you're most focused on. What you need from the board today.
|
||
|
||
**(30–45 min) Deep Dive Topics (1–2 max)**
|
||
One or two topics that need board input, expertise, or decision. Not status updates — strategic questions. "Should we enter the enterprise market now or in 12 months?" "We have two acquisition opportunities — what's your view?"
|
||
|
||
**(30 min) Financial Review**
|
||
Actuals vs budget. Burn, runway, key metrics. Honest discussion of variance.
|
||
|
||
**(15 min) Closed Session (CEO + Board only)**
|
||
Every meeting. Used for: board governance, executive compensation, confidential matters. This signals maturity. Skip it and directors raise it anyway.
|
||
|
||
**(15 min) Wrap + Action Items**
|
||
What was decided, who owns what, by when. Sent within 24 hours.
|
||
|
||
### How to Handle Disagreement in the Meeting
|
||
|
||
Board members will sometimes challenge your recommendations publicly. How you handle it determines the room's perception of your leadership.
|
||
|
||
**Good response to challenge:**
|
||
1. Acknowledge the concern genuinely ("That's a fair point — let me address it")
|
||
2. State your position with specific evidence
|
||
3. Acknowledge uncertainty where it exists
|
||
4. Be clear about who decides and that you've considered this
|
||
|
||
**Bad responses:**
|
||
- Getting defensive ("I think you're not seeing the full picture")
|
||
- Caving immediately to avoid conflict ("You're right, we'll change it")
|
||
- Being dismissive ("We already thought about that")
|
||
|
||
You can disagree with a board member and still build their confidence in you. What matters is how you engage with the challenge.
|
||
|
||
### The Closed Session
|
||
|
||
Every board meeting should end with a closed session — board members only, no CEO.
|
||
|
||
**Yes, this is uncomfortable.** It's supposed to be. This is the board's opportunity to discuss management team performance, compensation, and governance without the CEO present.
|
||
|
||
Don't skip it because it makes you nervous. Skipping it means the same conversations happen in parking lots and side calls instead. Better in the room.
|
||
|
||
**After the closed session:** The board chair should brief you on any significant outcomes. If they don't, ask.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 4: When the Board Loses Confidence
|
||
|
||
### Early Warning Signs
|
||
|
||
- Questions about the management team become more frequent
|
||
- Board members start contacting reports directly without telling you
|
||
- You notice side conversations happening before or after board meetings
|
||
- Meeting dynamics shift — less engagement, more skepticism
|
||
- A director asks to be added to distribution lists you normally manage
|
||
- Requests for more frequent reporting
|
||
|
||
**The mistake:** Pretending not to notice.
|
||
|
||
**The right move:** Name it. "I've noticed some different dynamics in recent board interactions. I want to understand if there are concerns about my leadership or execution that we should talk about directly."
|
||
|
||
This is hard. It's also the only thing that gives you a chance to address it.
|
||
|
||
### The CEO Review
|
||
|
||
Most boards conduct annual or semi-annual CEO reviews. If yours doesn't, ask for one. This is a governance strength, not a vulnerability.
|
||
|
||
Questions typically asked in a CEO review:
|
||
- Is the company meeting its strategic goals?
|
||
- Is the CEO executing on the plan?
|
||
- Is the CEO building the right team?
|
||
- What's the CEO's relationship with the board?
|
||
- Is the CEO growing into the company's stage?
|
||
|
||
**Preparing for your own review:** Self-assess honestly first. Know where you're strong and where you're not. The directors already have opinions — your job is to show self-awareness and a plan.
|
||
|
||
### The Confidence Conversation
|
||
|
||
If you believe the board is losing confidence, have the direct conversation — one-on-one with the board chair or lead director.
|
||
|
||
"I want to be direct with you. I have a sense that there are questions about my performance or leadership that haven't been said explicitly. I'd rather hear them directly than through signals."
|
||
|
||
**If the answer is yes, there are concerns:**
|
||
- Listen without defending
|
||
- Ask clarifying questions
|
||
- Ask what a successful path forward looks like
|
||
- Agree on specific commitments and a timeline
|
||
|
||
**If the answer is "no, everything is fine":**
|
||
- Note your concern ("I appreciate that, and I'd rather air this concern than not")
|
||
- Keep watching the signals
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Part 5: Managing Investor Expectations
|
||
|
||
### The Fundraising Narrative
|
||
|
||
Your current investors are your reference letters for the next round. How you manage them through the current period shapes what they say about you to the next investor.
|
||
|
||
**The mistake:** Only engaging investors deeply when you need something.
|
||
|
||
**The right approach:** Proactive, regular, honest communication. Monthly investor updates. Reply to emails within 24 hours. Share wins and problems with equal transparency.
|
||
|
||
### Monthly Investor Update Template
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
[Company] — [Month] Update
|
||
|
||
**Headline:** [One sentence — the most important thing that happened]
|
||
|
||
**Key Metrics:**
|
||
- MRR: $X (vs $Y last month)
|
||
- Burn: $X/month, Runway: X months
|
||
- [3-5 metrics that matter for your stage]
|
||
|
||
**What went well:**
|
||
- [2-3 bullets]
|
||
|
||
**What didn't:**
|
||
- [1-2 bullets — being honest here builds more trust than hiding it]
|
||
|
||
**What we need:**
|
||
- [Specific asks — introductions, expertise, candidates]
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Monthly. Brief. Honest. Consistent. This is table stakes.
|
||
|
||
### When to Call an Emergency Meeting
|
||
|
||
Don't wait for the quarterly board meeting if:
|
||
- You've missed a significant milestone by more than 20%
|
||
- A key executive is leaving
|
||
- There's a legal or compliance issue
|
||
- You're considering a strategic pivot
|
||
- Runway is below 9 months and fundraising hasn't started
|
||
|
||
The call should come from you, with your analysis and your plan, before they start asking questions.
|
||
|
||
### Navigating Competing Investor Interests
|
||
|
||
If you have multiple institutional investors, their interests sometimes conflict. Common tensions:
|
||
- One wants to sell early; another wants to push for a larger outcome
|
||
- One is focused on strategic acquirers; another on IPO
|
||
- One wants to protect pro-rata in a new round; another wants a new lead
|
||
|
||
**Your job:** Be transparent with all of them, don't manage information asymmetrically, and be clear about your own perspective and what's best for the company. You serve the company, not any individual investor.
|
||
|
||
When conflicts are severe: get independent legal counsel. Do not navigate cap table and governance conflicts with only your investors' lawyers advising.
|