Files
claude-skills-reference/docs/skills/c-level-advisor/board-meeting.md
Reza Rezvani 670930c69d feat(docs): implement unified design system across all generated pages
- Add CSS components: .page-meta badges, .domain-header, .install-banner
- Fix invisible tab navigation (explicit color for light/dark modes)
- Rewrite generate-docs.py with design system templates
- Domain indexes: centered headers with icons, install banners, grid cards
- Skill pages: pill badges (domain, skill ID, source), install commands
- Agent/command pages: type badges with domain icons
- Regenerate all 210 pages (180 skills + 15 agents + 15 commands)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-11 12:32:49 +01:00

150 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
title: "Board Meeting Protocol"
description: "Board Meeting Protocol - Claude Code skill from the C-Level Advisory domain."
---
# Board Meeting Protocol
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-account-tie: C-Level Advisory</span>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `board-meeting`</span>
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/board-meeting/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
</div>
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install c-level-skills</code>
</div>
Structured multi-agent deliberation that prevents groupthink, captures minority views, and produces clean, actionable decisions.
## Keywords
board meeting, executive deliberation, strategic decision, C-suite, multi-agent, /cs:board, founder review, decision extraction, independent perspectives
## Invoke
`/cs:board [topic]` — e.g. `/cs:board Should we expand to Spain in Q3?`
---
## The 6-Phase Protocol
### PHASE 1: Context Gathering
1. Load `memory/company-context.md`
2. Load `memory/board-meetings/decisions.md` **(Layer 2 ONLY — never raw transcripts)**
3. Reset session state — no bleed from previous conversations
4. Present agenda + activated roles → wait for founder confirmation
**Chief of Staff selects relevant roles** based on topic (not all 9 every time):
| Topic | Activate |
|-------|----------|
| Market expansion | CEO, CMO, CFO, CRO, COO |
| Product direction | CEO, CPO, CTO, CMO |
| Hiring/org | CEO, CHRO, CFO, COO |
| Pricing | CMO, CFO, CRO, CPO |
| Technology | CTO, CPO, CFO, CISO |
---
### PHASE 2: Independent Contributions (ISOLATED)
**No cross-pollination. Each agent runs before seeing others' outputs.**
Order: Research (if needed) → CMO → CFO → CEO → CTO → COO → CHRO → CRO → CISO → CPO
**Reasoning techniques:** CEO: Tree of Thought (3 futures) | CFO: Chain of Thought (show the math) | CMO: Recursion of Thought (draft→critique→refine) | CPO: First Principles | CRO: Chain of Thought (pipeline math) | COO: Step by Step (process map) | CTO: ReAct (research→analyze→act) | CISO: Risk-Based (P×I) | CHRO: Empathy + Data
**Contribution format (max 5 key points, self-verified):**
```
## [ROLE] — [DATE]
Key points (max 5):
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
• [Finding] — [VERIFIED/ASSUMED] — 🟢/🟡/🔴
Recommendation: [clear position]
Confidence: High / Medium / Low
Source: [where the data came from]
What would change my mind: [specific condition]
```
Each agent self-verifies before contributing: source attribution, assumption audit, confidence scoring. No untagged claims.
---
### PHASE 3: Critic Analysis
Executive Mentor receives ALL Phase 2 outputs simultaneously. Role: adversarial reviewer, not synthesizer.
Checklist:
- Where did agents agree too easily? (suspicious consensus = red flag)
- What assumptions are shared but unvalidated?
- Who is missing from the room? (customer voice? front-line ops?)
- What risk has nobody mentioned?
- Which agent operated outside their domain?
---
### PHASE 4: Synthesis
Chief of Staff delivers using the **Board Meeting Output** format (defined in `agent-protocol/SKILL.md`):
- Decision Required (one sentence)
- Perspectives (one line per contributing role)
- Where They Agree / Where They Disagree
- Critic's View (the uncomfortable truth)
- Recommended Decision + Action Items (owners, deadlines)
- Your Call (options if founder disagrees)
---
### PHASE 5: Human in the Loop ⏸️
**Full stop. Wait for the founder.**
```
⏸️ FOUNDER REVIEW — [Paste synthesis]
Options: ✅ Approve | ✏️ Modify | ❌ Reject | ❓ Ask follow-up
```
**Rules:**
- User corrections OVERRIDE agent proposals. No pushback. No "but the CFO said..."
- 30-min inactivity → auto-close as "pending review"
- Reopen any time with `/cs:board resume`
---
### PHASE 6: Decision Extraction
After founder approval:
- **Layer 1:** Write full transcript → `memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md`
- **Layer 2:** Append approved decisions → `memory/board-meetings/decisions.md`
- Mark rejected proposals `[DO_NOT_RESURFACE]`
- Confirm to founder with count of decisions logged, actions tracked, flags added
---
## Memory Structure
```
memory/board-meetings/
├── decisions.md # Layer 2 — founder-approved only (Phase 1 loads this)
├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md # Layer 1 — full transcripts (never auto-loaded)
└── archive/YYYY/ # Raw transcripts after 90 days
```
**Future meetings load Layer 2 only.** Never Layer 1. This prevents hallucinated consensus.
---
## Failure Mode Quick Reference
| Failure | Fix |
|---------|-----|
| Groupthink (all agree) | Re-run Phase 2 isolated; force "strongest argument against" |
| Analysis paralysis | Cap at 5 points; force recommendation even with Low confidence |
| Bikeshedding | Log as async action item; return to main agenda |
| Role bleed (CFO making product calls) | Critic flags; exclude from synthesis |
| Layer contamination | Phase 1 loads decisions.md only — hard rule |
---
## References
- `templates/meeting-agenda.md` — agenda format
- `templates/meeting-minutes.md` — final output format
- `references/meeting-facilitation.md` — conflict handling, timing, failure modes