- Add CSS components: .page-meta badges, .domain-header, .install-banner - Fix invisible tab navigation (explicit color for light/dark modes) - Rewrite generate-docs.py with design system templates - Domain indexes: centered headers with icons, install banners, grid cards - Skill pages: pill badges (domain, skill ID, source), install commands - Agent/command pages: type badges with domain icons - Regenerate all 210 pages (180 skills + 15 agents + 15 commands) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
207 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown
207 lines
8.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "Competitive Intelligence"
|
|
description: "Competitive Intelligence - Claude Code skill from the C-Level Advisory domain."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Competitive Intelligence
|
|
|
|
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-account-tie: C-Level Advisory</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `competitive-intel`</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/competitive-intel/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
|
|
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install c-level-skills</code>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.
|
|
|
|
## Keywords
|
|
competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy
|
|
|
|
## Quick Start
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
/ci:landscape — Map your competitive space (direct, indirect, future)
|
|
/ci:battlecard [name] — Build a sales battlecard for a specific competitor
|
|
/ci:winloss — Analyze recent wins and losses by reason
|
|
/ci:update [name] — Track what a competitor did recently
|
|
/ci:map — Build competitive positioning map
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System
|
|
|
|
### Layer 1: Competitor Identification
|
|
|
|
**Direct competitors:** Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point.
|
|
**Indirect competitors:** Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house").
|
|
**Future competitors:** Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.
|
|
|
|
**The 2x2 Threat Matrix:**
|
|
|
|
| | Same ICP | Different ICP |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| **Same problem** | Direct threat | Adjacent (watch) |
|
|
| **Different problem** | Displacement risk | Ignore for now |
|
|
|
|
Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?
|
|
|
|
### Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions
|
|
|
|
Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:
|
|
|
|
| Dimension | Sources | Cadence |
|
|
|-----------|---------|---------|
|
|
| **Product moves** | Changelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedIn | Monthly |
|
|
| **Pricing changes** | Pricing page, sales call intel, customer feedback | Triggered |
|
|
| **Funding** | Crunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedIn | Triggered |
|
|
| **Hiring signals** | LinkedIn job postings, Indeed | Monthly |
|
|
| **Partnerships** | Press releases, co-marketing | Triggered |
|
|
| **Customer wins** | Case studies, review sites, LinkedIn | Monthly |
|
|
| **Customer losses** | Win/loss interviews, churned accounts | Ongoing |
|
|
| **Messaging shifts** | Homepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library) | Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
### Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks
|
|
|
|
**SWOT per Competitor:**
|
|
- Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
|
|
- Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
|
|
- Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
|
|
- Threats: What's their existential risk?
|
|
|
|
**Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis):**
|
|
Choose axes that matter for your buyers:
|
|
- Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
|
|
- Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly
|
|
|
|
**Feature Gap Analysis:**
|
|
| Feature | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Gap status |
|
|
|---------|-----|-------------|-------------|------------|
|
|
| [Feature] | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Your advantage |
|
|
| [Feature] | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | Gap — roadmap? |
|
|
| [Feature] | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | Moat |
|
|
| [Feature] | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | Competitor B only |
|
|
|
|
### Layer 4: Output Formats
|
|
|
|
**For Sales (CRO):** Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep.
|
|
See `templates/battlecard-template.md`
|
|
|
|
**For Marketing (CMO):** Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.
|
|
|
|
**For Product (CPO):** Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.
|
|
|
|
**For CEO/Board:** Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.
|
|
|
|
### Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence
|
|
|
|
**Monthly (scheduled):**
|
|
- Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
|
|
- Update battlecards with new intel
|
|
- Publish 1-page summary to leadership
|
|
|
|
**Triggered (event-based):**
|
|
- Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
|
|
- Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
|
|
- Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
|
|
- Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week
|
|
|
|
**Quarterly:**
|
|
- Full competitive landscape review
|
|
- Update positioning map
|
|
- Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
|
|
- Add/remove companies from tracking list
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Win/Loss Analysis
|
|
|
|
This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.
|
|
|
|
**When to interview:**
|
|
- Every lost deal >$50K ACV
|
|
- Every churn >6 months tenure
|
|
- Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)
|
|
|
|
**Who conducts it:**
|
|
- NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
|
|
- Customer success, product team, or external researcher
|
|
|
|
**Question structure:**
|
|
1. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
|
|
2. "Who else were you considering?"
|
|
3. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
|
|
4. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
|
|
5. "What was the deciding factor?"
|
|
6. "What would have changed your decision?"
|
|
|
|
**Aggregate findings monthly:**
|
|
- Win reasons (rank by frequency)
|
|
- Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
|
|
- Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
|
|
- Patterns over time
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession
|
|
|
|
**Signs you're over-tracking competitors:**
|
|
- Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
|
|
- Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
|
|
- You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
|
|
- Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"
|
|
|
|
**Signs you're under-tracking:**
|
|
- Your AEs get blindsided on calls
|
|
- Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
|
|
- You missed a major product launch until customers told you
|
|
- Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves
|
|
|
|
**The right posture:**
|
|
- Know competitors well enough to win against them
|
|
- Don't let them set your agenda
|
|
- Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Distributing Intelligence
|
|
|
|
| Audience | Format | Cadence | Owner |
|
|
|----------|--------|---------|-------|
|
|
| AEs + SDRs | Updated battlecards in CRM | Monthly + triggered | CRO |
|
|
| Product | Feature gap analysis | Quarterly | CPO |
|
|
| Marketing | Positioning brief | Quarterly | CMO |
|
|
| Leadership | 1-page competitive summary | Monthly | CEO/COO |
|
|
| Board | Competitive landscape slide | Quarterly | CEO |
|
|
|
|
**One source of truth:** All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence
|
|
|
|
| Signal | What it means |
|
|
|--------|---------------|
|
|
| Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segment | Fundamental positioning problem, not sales problem |
|
|
| Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X" | Feature gap that's real, not just optics |
|
|
| Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domain | Major product investment incoming |
|
|
| Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP | 12-month runway for them to compete hard |
|
|
| Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decision | You're the "check box" — fix perception or segment |
|
|
|
|
## Integration with C-Suite Roles
|
|
|
|
| Intelligence Type | Feeds To | Output Format |
|
|
|------------------|----------|---------------|
|
|
| Product moves | CPO | Roadmap input, feature gap analysis |
|
|
| Pricing changes | CRO, CFO | Pricing response recommendations |
|
|
| Funding rounds | CEO, CFO | Strategic positioning update |
|
|
| Hiring signals | CHRO, CTO | Talent market intelligence |
|
|
| Customer wins/losses | CRO, CMO | Battlecard updates, positioning shifts |
|
|
| Marketing campaigns | CMO | Counter-positioning, channel intelligence |
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
- `references/ci-playbook.md` — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
|
|
- `templates/battlecard-template.md` — sales battlecard template
|