- Add CSS components: .page-meta badges, .domain-header, .install-banner - Fix invisible tab navigation (explicit color for light/dark modes) - Rewrite generate-docs.py with design system templates - Domain indexes: centered headers with icons, install banners, grid cards - Skill pages: pill badges (domain, skill ID, source), install commands - Agent/command pages: type badges with domain icons - Regenerate all 210 pages (180 skills + 15 agents + 15 commands) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
201 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
201 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: "Internal Narrative Builder"
|
||
description: "Internal Narrative Builder - Claude Code skill from the C-Level Advisory domain."
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Internal Narrative Builder
|
||
|
||
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
|
||
<span class="meta-badge">:material-account-tie: C-Level Advisory</span>
|
||
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `internal-narrative`</span>
|
||
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/internal-narrative/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
|
||
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install c-level-skills</code>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
|
||
One company. Many audiences. Same truth — different lenses. Narrative inconsistency is trust erosion. This skill builds and maintains coherent communication across every stakeholder group.
|
||
|
||
## Keywords
|
||
narrative, company story, internal communication, investor update, all-hands, board communication, crisis communication, messaging, storytelling, narrative consistency, audience translation, founder narrative, employee communication, candidate narrative, partner communication
|
||
|
||
## Core Principle
|
||
|
||
**The same fact lands differently depending on who hears it and what they need.**
|
||
|
||
"We're shifting resources from Product A to Product B" means:
|
||
- To employees: "Is my job safe? Why are we abandoning what I built?"
|
||
- To investors: "Smart capital allocation — they're doubling down on the winner"
|
||
- To customers of Product A: "Are they abandoning us?"
|
||
- To candidates: "Exciting new focus — are they decisive?"
|
||
|
||
Same fact. Four different narratives needed. The skill is maintaining truth while serving each audience's actual question.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Framework
|
||
|
||
### Step 1: Build the Core Narrative
|
||
|
||
One paragraph that every other communication derives from. This is the source of truth.
|
||
|
||
**Core narrative template:**
|
||
> [Company name] exists to [mission — present tense, specific]. We're building [what you're building] because [the problem you're solving]. Our approach is [your unique way of doing this]. We're at [honest description of current state] and heading toward [where you're going in concrete terms].
|
||
|
||
**Good core narrative (example):**
|
||
> Acme Health exists to reduce preventable falls in elderly care using smartphone-based mobility analysis. We're building an AI diagnostic tool for care teams because current fall risk assessments are subjective, infrequent, and often wrong. Our approach — using the phone's camera during a 10-second walking test — means no new hardware, no specialist required. We have 80 care facilities in DACH paying us €800K ARR, and we're heading to €3M ARR by demonstrating clinical value at scale before our Series B.
|
||
|
||
**Bad core narrative:**
|
||
> Acme Health is an innovative AI company revolutionizing elderly care through cutting-edge technology that empowers care providers and improves patient outcomes across the continuum of care.
|
||
|
||
The good version is usable. The bad version says nothing.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Step 2: Audience Translation Matrix
|
||
|
||
Take the core narrative and translate it for each audience. Same truth, different frame.
|
||
|
||
| Fact | Employees need to hear | Investors need to hear | Customers need to hear | Candidates need to hear |
|
||
|------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|------------------------|
|
||
| We have 80 customers | "We've proven the model — your work matters" | "Product-market fit signal, capital efficient" | "80 care facilities trust us" | "Traction you'd be joining" |
|
||
| We pivoted from hardware | "We were honest enough to change course" | "Capital-efficient pivot to better unit economics" | "We found a faster, simpler way to serve you" | "We make decisions based on evidence, not ego" |
|
||
| We missed Q2 revenue | "Here's why, here's the plan, here's what you can do" | "Revenue mix shifted — trailing indicator improving" | [Usually don't tell customers revenue misses] | [Usually not shared externally] |
|
||
| We're hiring fast | "The team is growing — your network matters" | "Headcount plan aligned to growth" | [Not relevant unless it affects service] | "This is a rocket ship moment" |
|
||
|
||
**Rules:**
|
||
- Never contradict yourself across audiences. Different framing ≠ different facts.
|
||
- "We told investors growth, told employees efficiency" is a contradiction. Audit for this.
|
||
- Investors and employees see each other. Board members talk to your team. Candidates google you.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Step 3: Contradiction Detection
|
||
|
||
Before any major communication, run the contradiction check:
|
||
|
||
**Question 1:** What did we tell investors last month about [topic]?
|
||
**Question 2:** What did we tell employees about the same topic?
|
||
**Question 3:** Are these consistent? If not — which version is true?
|
||
|
||
**Common contradictions:**
|
||
- "Efficient growth" to investors + "we're hiring aggressively" to candidates
|
||
- "Strong pipeline" to investors + "sales is struggling" at all-hands
|
||
- "Customer-first" in culture + recent decisions that clearly prioritized revenue over customer need
|
||
|
||
**When you catch a contradiction:** Fix the less accurate version, then communicate the correction explicitly. "Last month I said X. After more reflection, X is not quite right. Here's the clearer version."
|
||
|
||
Correcting yourself before someone else catches it builds more trust than getting caught.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Step 4: Audience-Specific Communication Cadence
|
||
|
||
| Audience | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|
||
|----------|--------|-----------|-------|
|
||
| Employees | All-hands | Monthly | CEO |
|
||
| Employees | Team updates | Weekly | Team leads |
|
||
| Investors | Written update | Monthly | CEO + CFO |
|
||
| Board | Board meeting + memo | Quarterly | CEO |
|
||
| Customers | Product updates | Per release | CPO / CS |
|
||
| Candidates | Careers page + interview narrative | Ongoing | CHRO + Founders |
|
||
| Partners | Quarterly business review | Quarterly | BD Lead |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Step 5: All-Hands Structure and Cadence
|
||
|
||
See `templates/all-hands-template.md` for the full template.
|
||
|
||
**Principles:**
|
||
- Lead with honest state of the company. No spin.
|
||
- Connect company performance to individual work: "Here's how what you built contributed to this outcome."
|
||
- Give people a reason to be proud of their choice to work here.
|
||
- Leave time for real Q&A — not curated questions.
|
||
|
||
**All-hands failure modes:**
|
||
- CEO speaks for 55 of 60 minutes; Q&A is "any quick questions?"
|
||
- All good news, all the time — employees know when you're not being honest
|
||
- Metrics without context: "ARR grew 15%" without explaining if that's good, bad, or expected
|
||
- Questions deflected: "That's a great point, we should follow up on that" → never followed up
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Step 6: Crisis Communication
|
||
|
||
When the narrative breaks — someone leaves publicly, a product fails, a security breach, a press article.
|
||
|
||
**The 4-hour rule:** If something is public or about to be, communicate internally within 4 hours. Employees should never learn about company news from Twitter.
|
||
|
||
**Crisis communication sequence:**
|
||
|
||
**Hour 0–4 (internal first):**
|
||
1. CEO or relevant leader sends an internal message
|
||
2. Acknowledge what happened factually
|
||
3. State what you know and what you don't know yet
|
||
4. Tell people what you're doing about it
|
||
5. Tell people what they should do if they're asked about it
|
||
|
||
**Hour 4–24 (external if needed):**
|
||
1. External statement (press, social) only if the event is public
|
||
2. Consistent with the internal message — same facts, audience-appropriate framing
|
||
3. Legal review if any claims or liability involved
|
||
|
||
**What not to do in a crisis:**
|
||
- Silence: letting rumors fill the vacuum
|
||
- Spin: people can detect it and it destroys trust
|
||
- "No comment": says "we have something to hide"
|
||
- Blaming: even if someone else caused the problem, your audience only cares what you're doing about it
|
||
|
||
**Template for crisis internal communication:**
|
||
> "Here's what happened: [factual description]. Here's what we know right now: [known facts]. Here's what we don't know yet: [honest uncertainty]. Here's what we're doing: [specific actions]. Here's what you should do if you're asked about this: [specific guidance]. I'll update you by [specific time] with more information."
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Narrative Consistency Checklist
|
||
|
||
Run before any major external communication:
|
||
|
||
- [ ] Is this consistent with what we told investors last month?
|
||
- [ ] Is this consistent with what we told employees at the last all-hands?
|
||
- [ ] Does this contradict anything on our website, careers page, or press releases?
|
||
- [ ] If an employee read this external communication, would they recognize the company being described?
|
||
- [ ] If an investor read our internal all-hands deck, would they find anything inconsistent?
|
||
- [ ] Have we been accurate about our current state, or are we projecting an aspiration?
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Key Questions for Narrative
|
||
|
||
- "Could a new employee explain to a friend why our company exists? What would they say?"
|
||
- "What do we tell investors about our strategy? What do we tell employees? Are these the same?"
|
||
- "If a journalist asked our team members to describe the company independently, what would they say?"
|
||
- "When did we last update our 'why we exist' story? Is it still true?"
|
||
- "What's the hardest question we'd get from each audience? Do we have an honest answer?"
|
||
|
||
## Red Flags
|
||
|
||
- Different departments describe the company mission differently
|
||
- Investor narrative emphasizes growth; employee narrative emphasizes stability (or vice versa)
|
||
- All-hands presentations are mostly slides, mostly one-way
|
||
- Q&A questions are screened or deflected
|
||
- Bad news reaches employees through Slack rumors before leadership communication
|
||
- Careers page describes a culture that employees don't recognize
|
||
|
||
## Integration with Other C-Suite Roles
|
||
|
||
| When... | Work with... | To... |
|
||
|---------|-------------|-------|
|
||
| Investor update prep | CFO | Align financial narrative with company narrative |
|
||
| Reorg or leadership change | CHRO + CEO | Sequence: employees first, then external |
|
||
| Product pivot | CPO | Align customer communication with investor story |
|
||
| Culture change | Culture Architect | Ensure internal story is consistent with external employer brand |
|
||
| M&A or partnership | CEO + COO | Control information flow, prevent narrative leaks |
|
||
| Crisis | All C-suite | Single voice, consistent story, internal first |
|
||
|
||
## Detailed References
|
||
- `references/narrative-frameworks.md` — Storytelling structures, founder narrative, bad news delivery, all-hands templates
|
||
- `templates/all-hands-template.md` — All-hands presentation template
|