- Add CSS components: .page-meta badges, .domain-header, .install-banner - Fix invisible tab navigation (explicit color for light/dark modes) - Rewrite generate-docs.py with design system templates - Domain indexes: centered headers with icons, install banners, grid cards - Skill pages: pill badges (domain, skill ID, source), install commands - Agent/command pages: type badges with domain icons - Regenerate all 210 pages (180 skills + 15 agents + 15 commands) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
324 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
324 lines
9.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
title: "QMS Audit Expert"
|
|
description: "QMS Audit Expert - Claude Code skill from the Regulatory & Quality domain."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# QMS Audit Expert
|
|
|
|
<div class="page-meta" markdown>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-shield-check-outline: Regulatory & Quality</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-identifier: `qms-audit-expert`</span>
|
|
<span class="meta-badge">:material-github: <a href="https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/ra-qm-team/qms-audit-expert/SKILL.md">Source</a></span>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
<div class="install-banner" markdown>
|
|
<span class="install-label">Install:</span> <code>claude /plugin install ra-qm-skills</code>
|
|
</div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
- [Audit Planning Workflow](#audit-planning-workflow)
|
|
- [Audit Execution](#audit-execution)
|
|
- [Nonconformity Management](#nonconformity-management)
|
|
- [External Audit Preparation](#external-audit-preparation)
|
|
- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
|
|
- [Tools](#tools)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Audit Planning Workflow
|
|
|
|
Plan risk-based internal audit program:
|
|
|
|
1. List all QMS processes requiring audit
|
|
2. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
|
|
3. Review previous audit findings and trends
|
|
4. Determine audit frequency by risk level
|
|
5. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
|
|
6. Create annual audit schedule
|
|
7. Communicate schedule to process owners
|
|
8. **Validation:** All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle
|
|
|
|
### Risk-Based Audit Frequency
|
|
|
|
| Risk Level | Frequency | Criteria |
|
|
|------------|-----------|----------|
|
|
| High | Quarterly | Design control, CAPA, production validation |
|
|
| Medium | Semi-annual | Purchasing, training, document control |
|
|
| Low | Annual | Infrastructure, management review (if stable) |
|
|
|
|
### Audit Scope by Clause
|
|
|
|
| Clause | Process | Focus Areas |
|
|
|--------|---------|-------------|
|
|
| 4.2 | Document Control | Document approval, distribution, obsolete control |
|
|
| 5.6 | Management Review | Inputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked |
|
|
| 6.2 | Training | Competency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified |
|
|
| 7.3 | Design Control | Inputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes |
|
|
| 7.4 | Purchasing | Supplier evaluation, incoming inspection |
|
|
| 7.5 | Production | Work instructions, process validation, DHR |
|
|
| 7.6 | Calibration | Equipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance |
|
|
| 8.2.2 | Internal Audit | Schedule compliance, auditor independence |
|
|
| 8.3 | NC Product | Identification, segregation, disposition |
|
|
| 8.5 | CAPA | Root cause, implementation, effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
### Auditor Independence
|
|
|
|
Verify auditor independence before assignment:
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Auditor not responsible for area being audited
|
|
- [ ] No direct reporting relationship to auditee
|
|
- [ ] Not involved in recent activities under audit
|
|
- [ ] Documented qualification for audit scope
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Audit Execution
|
|
|
|
Conduct systematic internal audit:
|
|
|
|
1. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
|
|
2. Review relevant documentation before audit
|
|
3. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
|
|
4. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
|
|
5. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
|
|
6. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
|
|
7. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
|
|
8. **Validation:** All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence
|
|
|
|
### Evidence Collection
|
|
|
|
| Method | Use For | Documentation |
|
|
|--------|---------|---------------|
|
|
| Document review | Procedures, records | Document number, version, date |
|
|
| Interview | Process understanding | Interviewee name, role, summary |
|
|
| Observation | Actual practice | What, where, when observed |
|
|
| Record trace | Process flow | Record IDs, dates, linkage |
|
|
|
|
### Audit Questions by Clause
|
|
|
|
**Document Control (4.2):**
|
|
- Show me the document master list
|
|
- How do you control obsolete documents?
|
|
- Show me evidence of document change approval
|
|
|
|
**Design Control (7.3):**
|
|
- Show me the Design History File for [product]
|
|
- Who participates in design reviews?
|
|
- Show me design input to output traceability
|
|
|
|
**CAPA (8.5):**
|
|
- Show me the CAPA log with open items
|
|
- How do you determine root cause?
|
|
- Show me effectiveness verification records
|
|
|
|
See `references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` for complete question sets.
|
|
|
|
### Finding Documentation
|
|
|
|
Document each finding with:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
|
|
Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
|
|
Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Example:**
|
|
```
|
|
Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
|
|
at specified intervals.
|
|
|
|
Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
|
|
last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
|
|
12 months. Today is 2025-03-20.
|
|
|
|
Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
|
|
representing a gap in calibration program execution.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Nonconformity Management
|
|
|
|
Classify and manage audit findings:
|
|
|
|
1. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
|
|
2. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
|
|
3. Document finding with objective evidence
|
|
4. Communicate to process owner
|
|
5. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
|
|
6. Track to closure
|
|
7. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
|
|
8. **Validation:** Finding closed only after effective CAPA
|
|
|
|
### Classification Criteria
|
|
|
|
| Category | Definition | CAPA Required | Timeline |
|
|
|----------|------------|---------------|----------|
|
|
| Major | Systematic failure or absence of element | Yes | 30 days |
|
|
| Minor | Isolated lapse or partial implementation | Recommended | 60 days |
|
|
| Observation | Improvement opportunity | Optional | As appropriate |
|
|
|
|
### Classification Decision
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Is required element absent or failed?
|
|
├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
|
|
│ └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
|
|
│ └── No → MINOR
|
|
└── No → Deviation from procedure?
|
|
├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
|
|
│ └── No → MINOR
|
|
└── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### CAPA Integration
|
|
|
|
| Finding Severity | CAPA Depth | Verification |
|
|
|------------------|------------|--------------|
|
|
| Major | Full root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone) | Next audit or within 6 months |
|
|
| Minor | Immediate cause identification | Next scheduled audit |
|
|
| Observation | Not required | Noted at next audit |
|
|
|
|
See `references/nonconformity-classification.md` for detailed guidance.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## External Audit Preparation
|
|
|
|
Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:
|
|
|
|
1. Complete all scheduled internal audits
|
|
2. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
|
|
3. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
|
|
4. Conduct management review with audit as input
|
|
5. Prepare facility and personnel
|
|
6. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
|
|
7. Brief personnel on audit protocol
|
|
8. **Validation:** Mock audit findings addressed before external audit
|
|
|
|
### Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist
|
|
|
|
**Documentation:**
|
|
- [ ] Quality Manual current
|
|
- [ ] Procedures reflect actual practice
|
|
- [ ] Records complete and retrievable
|
|
- [ ] Previous audit findings closed
|
|
|
|
**Personnel:**
|
|
- [ ] Key personnel available during audit
|
|
- [ ] Subject matter experts identified
|
|
- [ ] Personnel briefed on audit protocol
|
|
- [ ] Escorts assigned
|
|
|
|
**Facility:**
|
|
- [ ] Work areas organized
|
|
- [ ] Documents at point of use current
|
|
- [ ] Equipment calibration status visible
|
|
- [ ] Nonconforming product segregated
|
|
|
|
### Mock Audit Protocol
|
|
|
|
1. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
|
|
2. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
|
|
3. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
|
|
4. Document findings as for real audit
|
|
5. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
|
|
6. Brief management on readiness status
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Reference Documentation
|
|
|
|
### ISO 13485 Audit Guide
|
|
|
|
`references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` contains:
|
|
|
|
- Clause-by-clause audit methodology
|
|
- Sample audit questions for each clause
|
|
- Evidence collection requirements
|
|
- Common nonconformities by clause
|
|
- Finding severity classification
|
|
|
|
### Nonconformity Classification
|
|
|
|
`references/nonconformity-classification.md` contains:
|
|
|
|
- Severity classification criteria and decision tree
|
|
- Impact vs. occurrence matrix
|
|
- CAPA integration requirements
|
|
- Finding documentation templates
|
|
- Closure requirements by severity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Tools
|
|
|
|
### Audit Schedule Optimizer
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Generate optimized audit schedule
|
|
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json
|
|
|
|
# Interactive mode
|
|
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive
|
|
|
|
# JSON output for integration
|
|
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:
|
|
- Process risk level
|
|
- Previous findings
|
|
- Days since last audit
|
|
- Criticality scores
|
|
|
|
**Output includes:**
|
|
- Prioritized audit schedule
|
|
- Quarterly distribution
|
|
- Overdue audit alerts
|
|
- Resource recommendations
|
|
|
|
### Sample Process Input
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"processes": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Design Control",
|
|
"iso_clause": "7.3",
|
|
"risk_level": "HIGH",
|
|
"last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
|
|
"previous_findings": 2
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Document Control",
|
|
"iso_clause": "4.2",
|
|
"risk_level": "MEDIUM",
|
|
"last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
|
|
"previous_findings": 0
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Audit Program Metrics
|
|
|
|
Track audit program effectiveness:
|
|
|
|
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|
|
|--------|--------|-------------|
|
|
| Schedule compliance | >90% | Audits completed on time |
|
|
| Finding closure rate | >95% | Findings closed by due date |
|
|
| Repeat findings | <10% | Same finding in consecutive audits |
|
|
| CAPA effectiveness | >90% | Verified effective at follow-up |
|
|
| Auditor utilization | 4 days/month | Audit days per qualified auditor |
|