docs: Add Task #89 - DERP Protocol Review & Formalization
WHAT WAS DONE: - Added Task #89 to tasks.md (Tier 2 priority) - Documented need to review DERP protocol usage - Identified gap between intended and actual Gemini collaboration workflow - Captured questions about gemini-workspace repo usage - Connected to RV Dream (disaster recovery must work remotely) WHY: - gemini-workspace repo exists but sits empty - Gemini consultations happening ad-hoc (e.g., March 31 monorepo session) - No formalized workflow for Gemini collaboration - DERP protocol may need updating based on actual usage patterns - Firefrost Codex relationship to Gemini unclear CONTEXT: During gemini-workspace repo review (similar to brainstorming cleanup), realized DERP protocol established Feb 2026 but never actually stress-tested or formalized. Need comprehensive review to ensure disaster recovery strategy is operational, not just theoretical. FILES: - docs/core/tasks.md (modified, +31 lines for Task #89) Signed-off-by: The Golden Chronicler <claude@firefrostgaming.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2969,6 +2969,40 @@ Complete mobile-responsive CSS media queries ready to inject via Ghost Admin →
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 89. DERP Protocol Review & Formalization
|
||||
**Time:** 2-4 hours
|
||||
**Status:** IDENTIFIED — Needs comprehensive review
|
||||
**Priority:** Tier 2 — Infrastructure Health
|
||||
**Documentation:** `docs/core/DERP.md`, `gemini-workspace` repo
|
||||
|
||||
**WHY THIS MATTERS:**
|
||||
DERP (Disaster Emergency Recovery Protocol) was established as backup when Claude.ai fails, with Gemini as backup Chronicler. However, current usage is ad-hoc and gemini-workspace repo sits mostly empty despite being "active infrastructure."
|
||||
|
||||
**Current State:**
|
||||
- gemini-workspace repo exists with empty directory structure
|
||||
- Gemini consultations happen (like March 31 monorepo architecture session)
|
||||
- Results documented in ops-manual, not gemini-workspace
|
||||
- No formalized workflow for Gemini collaboration
|
||||
- Firefrost Codex (local AI) not yet complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions to Answer:**
|
||||
1. Should Gemini collaboration be formalized with structured workflow?
|
||||
2. Should gemini-workspace actively store Gemini session transcripts/proposals?
|
||||
3. What's relationship between Gemini (cloud) and Firefrost Codex (local)?
|
||||
4. Is current ad-hoc Gemini usage acceptable or needs formalization?
|
||||
5. Does DERP protocol need updating based on actual usage patterns?
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
- Review and update DERP protocol documentation
|
||||
- Decide on Gemini collaboration workflow (formal vs ad-hoc)
|
||||
- Determine gemini-workspace usage pattern
|
||||
- Clarify Firefrost Codex role in disaster recovery
|
||||
- Update infrastructure-manifest.md with AI partner strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Ensures disaster recovery strategy is actually usable when needed, not just theoretical. RV Dream requires working backup systems.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user