docs: Add Task #89 - DERP Protocol Review & Formalization

WHAT WAS DONE:
- Added Task #89 to tasks.md (Tier 2 priority)
- Documented need to review DERP protocol usage
- Identified gap between intended and actual Gemini collaboration workflow
- Captured questions about gemini-workspace repo usage
- Connected to RV Dream (disaster recovery must work remotely)

WHY:
- gemini-workspace repo exists but sits empty
- Gemini consultations happening ad-hoc (e.g., March 31 monorepo session)
- No formalized workflow for Gemini collaboration
- DERP protocol may need updating based on actual usage patterns
- Firefrost Codex relationship to Gemini unclear

CONTEXT:
During gemini-workspace repo review (similar to brainstorming cleanup),
realized DERP protocol established Feb 2026 but never actually stress-tested
or formalized. Need comprehensive review to ensure disaster recovery strategy
is operational, not just theoretical.

FILES:
- docs/core/tasks.md (modified, +31 lines for Task #89)

Signed-off-by: The Golden Chronicler <claude@firefrostgaming.com>
This commit is contained in:
Claude (Chronicler #35)
2026-03-31 21:37:12 +00:00
parent 40efe8f4ed
commit 497563379a

View File

@@ -2969,6 +2969,40 @@ Complete mobile-responsive CSS media queries ready to inject via Ghost Admin →
---
### 89. DERP Protocol Review & Formalization
**Time:** 2-4 hours
**Status:** IDENTIFIED — Needs comprehensive review
**Priority:** Tier 2 — Infrastructure Health
**Documentation:** `docs/core/DERP.md`, `gemini-workspace` repo
**WHY THIS MATTERS:**
DERP (Disaster Emergency Recovery Protocol) was established as backup when Claude.ai fails, with Gemini as backup Chronicler. However, current usage is ad-hoc and gemini-workspace repo sits mostly empty despite being "active infrastructure."
**Current State:**
- gemini-workspace repo exists with empty directory structure
- Gemini consultations happen (like March 31 monorepo architecture session)
- Results documented in ops-manual, not gemini-workspace
- No formalized workflow for Gemini collaboration
- Firefrost Codex (local AI) not yet complete
**Questions to Answer:**
1. Should Gemini collaboration be formalized with structured workflow?
2. Should gemini-workspace actively store Gemini session transcripts/proposals?
3. What's relationship between Gemini (cloud) and Firefrost Codex (local)?
4. Is current ad-hoc Gemini usage acceptable or needs formalization?
5. Does DERP protocol need updating based on actual usage patterns?
**Deliverables:**
- Review and update DERP protocol documentation
- Decide on Gemini collaboration workflow (formal vs ad-hoc)
- Determine gemini-workspace usage pattern
- Clarify Firefrost Codex role in disaster recovery
- Update infrastructure-manifest.md with AI partner strategy
**Impact:** Ensures disaster recovery strategy is actually usable when needed, not just theoretical. RV Dream requires working backup systems.
---
---