Reorg: Move breezehost routing to docs/external/
This commit is contained in:
93
docs/external/breezehost-nc1-routing.md
vendored
Normal file
93
docs/external/breezehost-nc1-routing.md
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
||||
# NC1 Inter-Datacenter Routing Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** February 9, 2026
|
||||
**Ticket:** #5ae82fd3
|
||||
**Issue:** TX1 Dallas ↔ NC1 Charlotte could not communicate
|
||||
**Resolution Time:** ~4.5 hours
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
TX1 (Dallas) and NC1 (Charlotte) could not communicate directly with each other, preventing:
|
||||
- Uptime Kuma monitoring of NC1 from Command Center
|
||||
- Cross-datacenter database architecture
|
||||
- BungeeCord/Velocity proxy networks
|
||||
- Direct server-to-server backups
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Diagnostic Work
|
||||
|
||||
**Test 1: TX1 → NC1 (Dallas to Charlotte)**
|
||||
```
|
||||
root@TX1# ping -c 4 216.239.104.130
|
||||
From 38.68.14.25 icmp_seq=1 Destination Net Unreachable
|
||||
--- 100% packet loss ---
|
||||
```
|
||||
Result: TX1's gateway immediately returned "Network Unreachable"
|
||||
|
||||
**Test 2: NC1 → TX1 (Charlotte to Dallas)**
|
||||
```
|
||||
root@NC1# traceroute -n 38.68.14.26
|
||||
1 216.239.104.129 0.092 ms
|
||||
2 * * *
|
||||
[times out after 9 hops]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Result: Asymmetric routing - NC1 could route toward Dallas but packets timed out
|
||||
|
||||
**Test 3: Firewall Check**
|
||||
```
|
||||
root@TX1# ufw status numbered | grep 216.239
|
||||
[no results]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Result: Not a firewall issue - pure routing problem
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Cause
|
||||
|
||||
Missing routing table entry on Breezehost's infrastructure to allow inter-datacenter communication between Dallas and Charlotte facilities.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
**Breezehost Action:** "Just needed a route added on our end" - Brandon E, Feb 9, 2026
|
||||
|
||||
**Verification:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
root@command-center# ping -c 3 216.239.104.130
|
||||
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:**
|
||||
- ✅ NC1 now fully monitored by Uptime Kuma (100% uptime)
|
||||
- ✅ Cross-datacenter architecture options enabled
|
||||
- ✅ Complete infrastructure visibility
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Lessons Learned
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Diagnostic work pays off:** Providing comprehensive test results (ping, traceroute, firewall checks) enabled fast resolution
|
||||
2. **Ask before assuming:** We assumed inter-DC isolation was intentional - it wasn't
|
||||
3. **Breezehost is responsive:** 4.5 hour turnaround on infrastructure routing changes
|
||||
4. **Document everything:** Having ticket history enables future reference
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Opportunities Unlocked
|
||||
|
||||
Now that TX1 ↔ NC1 communication works, we can explore:
|
||||
- Centralized MySQL/PostgreSQL database (single instance, both datacenters)
|
||||
- BungeeCord/Velocity proxy networks (seamless player transfers)
|
||||
- Direct backup replication (NC1 → TX1 or vice versa)
|
||||
- Load balancing across datacenters
|
||||
- Failover architectures
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Breezehost Contact:** Brandon E (Staff)
|
||||
**Appreciation:** "Like always, you guys are legends, I appreciate you" - Michael
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user