cafabd753b
Replace \"深度推理（上海）科技有限公司\" with \"字节跳动子公司\" as the case study example to avoid exposing user's own company info. Also update .gitignore to exclude: - deep-research-output/ (contains sensitive research data) - recovered_deep_research/ - .opencli/ - douban-skill/ (work-in-progress) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
113 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
113 lines
4.1 KiB
Markdown
# Deep Research Skill V6.1 Improvements
|
|
|
|
**Date**: 2026-04-03
|
|
**Version**: 2.3.0 → 2.4.0
|
|
**Based on**: User feedback and "字节跳动" case study
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Summary of Changes
|
|
|
|
### 1. Source Accessibility Policy - Critical Correction
|
|
|
|
**Problem Identified**:
|
|
Previously, we incorrectly banned all "privileged" sources. This was wrong because it prevented users from leveraging their competitive information advantages.
|
|
|
|
**The Real Issue**:
|
|
The problem is not using user's private information—it's **circular verification**: using user's data to "discover" what they already know about themselves.
|
|
|
|
**Example of the Error**:
|
|
```
|
|
User: "Research my company 字节跳动子公司"
|
|
❌ WRONG: Access user's Spaceship → "You own 25 domains"
|
|
→ This is circular: user already knows they own these domains
|
|
|
|
✅ RIGHT: Check public WHOIS → "Privacy protected, ownership not visible"
|
|
→ This is external research perspective
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Correct Classification**:
|
|
|
|
| Accessibility | For Self-Research | For Third-Party Research |
|
|
|--------------|-------------------|-------------------------|
|
|
| `public` | ✅ Use | ✅ Use |
|
|
| `semi-public` | ✅ Use | ✅ Use |
|
|
| `exclusive-user-provided` | ⚠️ Careful* | ✅ **ENCOURAGED** |
|
|
| `private-user-owned` | ❌ **FORBIDDEN** | N/A |
|
|
|
|
\* When user provides exclusive sources for their own company, evaluate if it's circular
|
|
|
|
### 2. Counter-Review Team V2
|
|
|
|
**Created**: 5-agent parallel review team
|
|
- 🔵 claim-validator: Claim validation
|
|
- 🟢 source-diversity-checker: Source diversity analysis
|
|
- 🟡 recency-validator: Recency/freshness checks
|
|
- 🟣 contradiction-finder: Contradiction and bias detection
|
|
- 🟠 counter-review-coordinator: Synthesis and reporting
|
|
|
|
**Usage**:
|
|
```bash
|
|
# 1. Dispatch to 4 specialists in parallel
|
|
SendMessage to: claim-validator
|
|
SendMessage to: source-diversity-checker
|
|
SendMessage to: recency-validator
|
|
SendMessage to: contradiction-finder
|
|
|
|
# 2. Send to coordinator for synthesis
|
|
SendMessage to: counter-review-coordinator
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Methodology Clarifications
|
|
|
|
#### When Researching User's Own Company
|
|
- **Approach**: External investigator perspective
|
|
- **Use**: Public sources only
|
|
- **Do NOT use**: User's private accounts (creates circular verification)
|
|
- **Report**: "From public perspective: X, Y, Z gaps"
|
|
|
|
#### When User Provides Exclusive Sources for Third-Party Research
|
|
- **Approach**: Leverage competitive advantage
|
|
- **Use**: User's paid subscriptions, private APIs, proprietary databases
|
|
- **Cite**: Mark as `exclusive-user-provided`
|
|
- **Report**: "Per user's exclusive source [Crunchbase Pro], competitor X raised $Y"
|
|
|
|
### 4. Registry Format Update
|
|
|
|
**Added fields**:
|
|
- `Accessibility`: public / semi-public / exclusive-user-provided / private-user-owned
|
|
- `Circular rejection tracking`: Note when sources are rejected for circular verification
|
|
|
|
**Updated anti-patterns**:
|
|
- ❌ **CIRCULAR VERIFICATION**: Never use user's private data to "discover" what they already know
|
|
- ✅ **USE EXCLUSIVE SOURCES**: When user provides Crunchbase Pro etc. for competitor research, USE IT
|
|
|
|
### 5. Documentation Updates
|
|
|
|
**New/Updated Files**:
|
|
- `source_accessibility_policy.md`: Complete rewrite explaining circular vs. competitive advantage distinction
|
|
- `counter_review_team_guide.md`: Usage guide for the 5-agent team
|
|
- `SKILL.md`: Updated Source Governance section with correct classification
|
|
- `marketplace.json`: Updated description
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Key Principles Summary
|
|
|
|
1. **Circular Verification is Bad**: Don't use user's data to tell them what they already know
|
|
2. **Exclusive Information Advantage is Good**: Use user's paid tools to research competitors
|
|
3. **External Perspective for Self-Research**: When researching user's own company, act like an external investigator
|
|
4. **Leverage Everything for Third-Party**: When researching others, use every advantage user provides
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Version History
|
|
|
|
| Version | Changes |
|
|
|---------|---------|
|
|
| 2.0.0 | Initial Enterprise Research Mode |
|
|
| 2.1.0 | V6 features: source governance, AS_OF, counter-review |
|
|
| 2.2.0 | Counter-Review Team |
|
|
| 2.3.0 | Source accessibility (initial, incorrect ban on privileged) |
|
|
| **2.4.0** | **Corrected: circular vs. exclusive advantage distinction** |
|